Child porn found on an iPhone application

July 2nd, 2009

A photo ostensibly showing a 15-year-old nude girl has turned up in an iPhone app, highlighting Apple’s inability to safeguard its application store from prohibited content.

The image appears in the free app BeautyMeter, which enables people to upload photos that are then rated by others, who assign a star-rating to members’ body parts and clothing. It’s much like an iPhone version of Hot or Not and many similar sites.

On Thursday, Apple pulled the app from the iTunes store.

BeautyMeter scandal

BeautyMeter scandal

The photo to the right (censored by Wired.com) depicts a photo of a nude girl snapping a photo of her reflection in a mirror. In the screenshot, the girl, who is listed as a 15-year-old from the United States, is topless and partially nude at the bottom.Nearly 5,000 users of the app have rated the photo. iPhone app review site Krapps discovered the photo.

The appearance of nudity in BeautyMeter underscored Apple’s difficulties regulating content in its App Store, which has surpassed 50,000 pieces of software available for download. For example, last week, Wired.com reported on an app called Hottest Girls, which released an update for its app to include topless photos of women. Apple pulled the app hours later, saying porn is not allowed.

“Apple will not distribute applications that contain inappropriate content, such as pornography,” an Apple spokesman said regarding Hottest Girls on June 25. “The developer of this application added inappropriate content directly from their server after the application had been approved and distributed, and after the developer had subsequently been asked to remove some offensive content. This was a direct violation of the terms of the iPhone Developer Program. The application is no longer available on the App Store.”

Apple made no similar announcement regarding BeautyMeter. It simply disappeared from the App Store. But in theory people who already had the app can continue to use it, including the upload and rating functionality.

On its web site, BeautyMeter’s developer Funnymals says members of BeautyMeter are required to provide their iPhone device ID so illegal content can be traced back to the owner of that phone.

“We don’t review each uploaded photo exclusively but from time to time we will clean up,” Funnymals stated in BeautyMeter’s terms and conditions.

As of 1:30 p.m. PDT Wednesday the image of the purported 15-year-old was still in the app.

Funnymals and Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Wired.com has not confirmed the photographed girl’s identity or her age.

Although U.S. federal and state laws prohibit child pornography, Funnymals and Apple will probably not be held liable for the content because they would be protected by the Communications Decency Act, according to Mark Rasch, a lawyer and founder of computer security consulting firm Secure IT Experts. That’s because when Apple approved the app, it did not contain the prohibited content. Instead, the app downloads images off the internet, thus placing the responsibility on the people who use the app.

However, Rasch said he expects Apple to remove the application, or the developer to remove the content, once made aware of it.

“They probably don’t have liability unless they have actual knowledge, in which case they have at least a legal or moral duty to act,” Rasch said.

ID Cards U-turn

June 30th, 2009

Is the government playing party politics with our civil liberties?

British citizens will never be forced to carry ID cards, the Government announced today.

Home Secretary Alan Johnson said that a trial scheme that was to force some airport staff to carry the controversial cards has been scrapped.
The massive climbdown means that carrying an ID card will now never be made compulsory for members of the general public.
The move signals the end of one of Labour’s most controversial policies, which has been championed by a succession of Home Secretaries, and threatens to further undermine the authority of the Prime Minister.

And the retreat will be seized upon by Opposition parties and campaigners who have argued the £5billion scheme is unnecessary and excessively expensive.

Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling accused the Government of an ‘absurd fudge’ over the decision.
Insisting that ID cards should be voluntary, Mr Johnson said: ‘Holding an identity card should be a personal choice for British citizens – just as it is now to obtain a passport.’
Previously, ministers said ID cards could become compulsory once 80 per cent of the population was covered.

UK ID Card

UK ID Card

What’s weird about this latest Home Office announcement on ID cards is not the mendacity. One gets used to that. It is its pretence simultaneously at calm and radical change.

Let us be clear: there is no radical change in this announcement, a compulsory identity card trial for airside workers due to start in September has been abandoned by the new home secretary but for the rest of us the Home Office line remains the same. No compulsion (as the Home Office means the term) was going to be applied until almost everyone had volunteered, and it was only a matter of rounding a minority of resisters and marginalised people.

The Home Office’s idea of voluntary is not the same as yours and mine.

Since 2004, and in petto before, the object of the exercise has been for the scheme to have “parasitic vitality”, for it to be a vampire on the body politic. It was – and is – to proceed by one-by-one “designating” under the Identity Cards Act other documents issued by official bodies, primarily passports.

Once a document has been designated, you won’t be able to apply for one without also applying to be entered, for life, on the national identity register. If you don’t it won’t be that you have been refused (say) a passport; you’d have voluntarily decided not to apply. There’s no compulsion to have a passport. It is useful for travelling. But you aren’t compelled to travel.

Or to drive. Or to work as a security guard. Or with children. Or in healthcare. To get parole from prison. To practice as a lawyer. Any official licence, registration certificate or permit can be designated, and – by the home office’s lights – handing control of your identity to the Home Office’s Identity and Passport Service will be entirely voluntary.

That they were due for a confrontation with the airside worker’s unions over designating new passes at Manchester and City Airports is an illustration of just how voluntary “voluntary” really is. But the fact they have now ducked that fight for political convenience suggests we can say, no. We just have to unveil the fraud of no compulsion first.

Work in progress

June 10th, 2009

Welcome to ViP2, the site. Currently under maintenance as we try to work out the best solution to bring you up to date news and information from all different sectors.

Whilst we do this, please feel free to continue onto the forum using the link below.

Click here to go to the forums

Many thanks.