Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
General Mac

RAPPERS RENAMING THEIR ALBUMS AFTER ONE OF THEIR PREVIOUS ALBUMS IS SHIT

28 posts in this topic

THE LIST Chronic 2001 - Dr dreJ.O.S.E - Fat JoeTICAL 2000 - Method ManBP2,BP3 - Jay-ZSORE - NoreOB4CL II - Raekwon STILLMACTIC - Nas (This was a 10/10 album though)Venni Vetti Vecci 2010 NEW JA RULEpost the ones i left off

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
THE LIST Chronic 2001 - Dr dreproblem with this is, the original chronic came out and it was a near perfect album. it changed the game forever and shaped the future of the genre. again chronic 2001 done exactly the same thing. a ground breaking near perfect release imo.J.O.S.E - Fat Joetrusay fat joe is some any guy so i shall ignoreTICAL 2000 - Method Manu have a point here. it didnt make much sense to me. hes had some serious changes over the yearsBP2,BP3 - Jay-Zeach time he releases one he thinks hes setting standards. he catted KRS Ones idea and hats off to him people think hes a legend even tho hes not tbh. its what he THINKS is a blueprint. such a huge EGOOOOOOSORE - NoreNMSOB4CL II - Raekwonaint bumped this niggas sh*t in years so i duno STILLMACTIC - Nas (This was a 10/10 album though)similar to the dre thing, both groundbreaking, this less but stillVenni Vetti Vecci 2010 NEW JA RULEf*ck ja. little bitchpost the ones i left off
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm confused on what this topic is about
ExampleBlueprint 1 NICE, Blueprint 2 EXCELLENT, Blueprint 3 - HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your clueless brahRelisten to your hiphopStillmatic is better than 85% of hiphop albums in historyLOL @ Tical being sh*tLMFAOf*ck off

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So your saying Stillmatic is better than Illmatic? Reasonable Doubt?IF SOkill%20yourself%20time.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your clueless brahRelisten to your hiphopStillmatic is better than 85% of hiphop albums in historyLOL @ Tical being sh*tLMFAOf*ck off
I concur.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously not better than Illmaticdoesnt mean its sh*t though as stated by your title

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously not better than Illmaticdoesnt mean its sh*t though as stated by your title

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The title isn't put very well.You'd assume it's referring to when people have a "part 2" to a sh*t album, but after reading a bit I'm assuming that you mean that the idea of having something named "part 2" is sh*t.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic title makes no sense at all when you look at the opening post.After reading all I have to say is you are on crack if Chronic 2001 and Tical 2000 are sh*t albums.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chronic 2001 was an amazing album, it's more notable than Chronic even.+ the official title was "2001" wasn't it?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Took me a whilr to get the titleHe is merely saying When rappers name an album / give the same name to a new album that the old one had, its sh*tI.e. Chronic, Chronic 2001 (as dubby said, it wasn't actually called chronic 2001 officially, just '2001'.Peopel egenrally do it because A) The original album is very successful/welll liked, so they rename the new one that in an attempt to gain a buzz simply through association that the new one will be sick because of this (check the blueprint 3 thread :/ )B.) Because they are starved for any creativity so just stick with what they knowC.) Because they have unused material/ideas/concepts left over from the original album that werent included for some reason or other (not all albums are just a straight 12 or 14 tracks - many have a theme or specific feel to them, a similarly titled album can indicate a similarly titled theme..)Also Really Illmatic and Stillmatic aren't the same thing, I think what he did was quite clever..I prefer things like that anyway over corny names like 'Loso's Way' :/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm confused on what this topic is about
ExampleBlueprint 1 NICE, Blueprint 2 EXCELLENT, Blueprint 3 - HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
BP2 >>> BP1 >>> BP3? :mellow:
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm confused on what this topic is about
ExampleBlueprint 1 NICE, Blueprint 2 EXCELLENT, Blueprint 3 - HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
BP2 >>> BP1 >>> BP3? :mellow:
InitBP1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> care not for the other 2
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BP3 ain't better than BP1 AT ALL, but allow dismissing the album like it's air...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fat Joe is sick bruvhis Me Myself n I album is crackstill bump that ona regular

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chronic 2001 was an amazing album, it's more notable than Chronic even.+ the official title was "2001" wasn't it?
f*ck OFFFFFFFFF!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i prefer a follow up title than a cliche title

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

venni vitti vici was hard tho, i remember really an truly rating ja rule at that point, so dissappointed in the years that followed

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this topic is one big wtf

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0