Jump to content

Mixed-race people are genetically healthier and more attractive


Southwesttwo

Recommended Posts

White supremacy is so last century. These days it's on-trend to be a mixed-race supremacist . Unlike the British National Party, mixed-race people can now point to scientifically credible research that highlights the various biological advantages of their ethnicity.

And that's not to mention the anecdotal evidence pointing to sports stars and celebrities such as Lewis Hamilton, Theo Walcott and Leona Lewis as representing the new ideal of physical beauty.

But is this just a media fad, sparked by the election of the world's most famous mixed-race person as President of the United States? And now that mixed-race people are our fastest growing ethnic group, what does it mean for Britain's uneasy relationship with race?

lewis-hamilton2.jpg

And now it seems that mixed race genes are being hailed as the latest Darwinian 'must-have' accessory. If you spent your childhood being called a 'mongrel' in the playground, the recent research by Cardiff University, which seems to show that mixed-race people are more attractive and more successful, may bring a wry smile to your face.

Dr Michael Lewis, who conducted the research said: 'Darwin suggested that diversity of genes led to greater genetic fitness and this in turn seems to be linked to attractiveness.'

Far from being an abomination of the natural order, mixed-race children are apparently biologically preferable. The logic is that the wider the gene pool (the further apart genetically two parents are) the greater protection from illness or genetic abnormality their children enjoy.

I recall being shunned by every white boy in the class as a 13-year-old girl. I never could have imagined the white mainstream would one day crown us 'the beautiful people'.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1268580/At-Its-cool-mixed-race-handy-Im-African-American-Jewish-Geordie-Irish-Scottish-Hungarian.html#ixzz0m7Af95nW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol what a waste of research time.

it dont take a genius to realise that there is more "chance" of having beter genetics from a wider pool of genes (i.e. different races). it doesnt mean that it will always produce better results. it could just as likely combine the worst of the two gene pools. fair enuff dominant genes may be in favour of better results but its still down to probability and there is no sure gurantee because the odds would still probably be quite spread out for all types of outcomes. things like this are highly subjective to the populas you asses. unless you examine every mixed race person and every non mixed race person you are not going to know for sure whether this specific genetic pooling has turned out better results.

besides this whole arguement is flawed when we have the knowledge of gene manipulation. if the aim is to obtain beter genetics at whatever cost, the ban on human gene manipulation could be lifted and we could just produce the best possible results every time regardless of probability. in short, any "race" could then be made better than the other.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...