Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest Esquilax

UNLKY For Some Of You

56 posts in this topic

Homophobic Men Most Aroused by Gay Male Porn

Even a man who thought that women want to have sex with their fathers and that women spend much of their lives distraught because they lack a penis is right sometimes. This person, the legend that is Sigmund Freud, theorized that people often have the most hateful and negative attitudes towards things they secretly crave, but feel that they shouldn't have.

If Freud is right, then perhaps men who are the most opposed to male homosexuality have particularly strong homosexual urges for other men.

One study asked heterosexal men how comfortable and anxious they are around gay men. Based on these scores, they then divided these men into two groups: men that are homophobic, and men who are not. These men were then shown three, four minute videos. One video depicted straight sex, one depicted lesbian sex and one depicted gay male sex. While this was happening, a device was attached to the male participant's penises. This device has been found to be triggered by sexual arousal, but not other types of arousal (such as nervousness, or fear - arousal often has a very different meaning in psychology than in popular usage).

When viewing lesbian sex and straight sex, both the homophobic and the non-homophobic men showed increased penis circumference. For gay male sex, however, only the homophobic men showed heightened penis arousal.

Heterosexual men with the most anti-gay attitudes, when asked, reported not being sexually aroused by gay male sex videos. But, their penises reported otherwise.

Homophobic men were the most sexually aroused by gay male sex acts.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-big-questions/201106/homophobic-men-most-aroused-gay-male-porn

-19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bet you wrote this didn't you? You don't like being the only gay on this site?

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only homo in here is the one that found the story and ACTUALLY COPIED IT in their KEYBOARD MEMORY and CARRIED it to another forum like they are safe to handle such TERMS.

9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:/ Unlucky for us???

Swear your the one who always fights for gay rights on here and always try to find out about homosexuals?

Think you are the confused unlucky one.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sigmund Freud, theorized that people often have the most hateful and negative attitudes towards things they secretly crave, but feel that they shouldn't have.

this must be true, it's always the biggest homophobes that spend the most time thinking about gays, always coming up with new names for them and sh*t, also on here when ppl post a fit bird and then say "lol@ being gay" i'm thinking why are thinking about being gay at a time when ur looking a nice females?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freud has pretty much been widely discredited, but the hard (excuse the pun) evidence is there

I'm sure it would stand up (sorry) under further analysis

-4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freud has pretty much been widely discredited, but the hard (excuse the pun) evidence is there

I'm sure it would stand up (sorry) under further analysis

The lack of "no homo" confirms you bat for the other side.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol @ sitting through 3 minutes of gay male porn

would have to pay me at least 10 grand to do that, still dunno if i could do it

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

id do it for 10k

not for "experimental" reasons tho, some joke especially if you're homophobic, article is prolly true

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lmao at not sitting through 3 minutes of gay porn for 10 grand,

f*ck*ng idiot

I'd do it for a hundred, infact I'd probably do it for £50

Not sure why esquilax has been negged either, since it's common knowledge that people often overcompensate for things they are ashamed of liking by projecting an image of hatred of said act/person/object

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never understood the hate for gays tbh

They don't effect my life what so ever.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because by highlighting that common knowledge, I must myself be a gay, because I'm offending the very core of every homophobe on the site

NLK

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never understood the hate for gays tbh

They don't effect my life what so ever.

coz its disgusting

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never understood the hate for gays tbh

They don't effect my life what so ever.

coz its disgusting

You can't truly hate something unless the issue itself means something to you personally. Which begs the question, why are you watching them so hard. Do you feel some moral obligation that society has to follow natural human nature/behaviour.

if your response is going to be

:/

then you need not reply

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never understood the hate for gays tbh

They don't effect my life what so ever.

coz its disgusting

You can't truly hate something unless the issue itself means something to you personally. Which begs the question, why are you watching them so hard.

if your response is going to be

:/

then you need not reply

:/

-5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

all jokes aside tho

i undertsnad tht they are gays in the world and i also belive tht its nt their fault but what i do bellive is that they should keep their deviant lifestyles underground and it should not be embraced by the media whatsover because its wrong completly wrong.

/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you to a certain extent, but the actual word hate should be reserved for the right types of people.

You may dislike or not approve with gays and their culture but I can't see why anyone would hate them.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freud has pretty much been widely discredited, but the hard (excuse the pun) evidence is there

I'm sure it would stand up (sorry) under further analysis

The lack of "no homo" confirms you bat for the other side.

Was the irony on purpose?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

man condones his boys getting sucked off by faggot trannies and buss joke about it

what do you expect?

llow dem ting deya

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

man condones his boys getting sucked off by faggot trannies and buss joke about it

what do you expect?

llow dem ting deya

Esquilax does?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lmao at not sitting through 3 minutes of gay porn for 10 grand,

f*ck*ng idiot

I'd do it for a hundred, infact I'd probably do it for £50

Not sure why esquilax has been negged either, since it's common knowledge that people often overcompensate for things they are ashamed of liking by projecting an image of hatred of said act/person/object

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i gots no problem with gays

but yuo'd watch gay porn for £50?

wow

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0