Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Mame Biram Diouf

Carling Cup Q/F Draw

57 posts in this topic

Arsenal vs Man City

Chelsea vs Liverpool

Man Utd vs Crystal Palace

Cardiff vs Blackburn

Who you think will make it through?

Wenger is pissed, its a must win game and Mancini will probably play strongest team to keep them in that drought

:lol: :lol:

Man Utd vs Man City final if the draws allow it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess them Utd/Palace fans finally get a chance to go Old Trafford.

Didn't know ours is a MUST win game.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reckon Arsenal will beat City, then lose to Cardif or Blackburn, such is life,

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess them Utd/Palace fans finally get a chance to go Old Trafford.

:lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lmao

/

We'll beat the racists.

bearing in mind the 2 racism storms brewing in the league right now, the irony or possible sarcasm of this post is not lost on me,

also history is quite a bitch when you look into the history of both the clubs involved, (fan wise) when it come to racist activity

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lmao

/

We'll beat the racists.

Pot

Kettle

Black

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in Spanish-speaking countries such as Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay where there are few people of African origin and appearance, negro (negra for females) is commonly used to refer to partners, close friends[13] or people in general independent of skin color. In Venezuela the word negro is similarly used, despite its large African descent population.

Can someone offer an explanation for Black fucking c*nt?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

actually it was fucking black c*nt

im sure chelsea are preparing something along the lines of this: "black c*nt in the old english etymology is derived from the viking word 'bl'aek k'nunt' an ancient foul tasting bread made from wheat and rye, which Jon was offering to anton in a whimsical fashion as a retort to his insults about wayne bridge "

6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in Spanish-speaking countries such as Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay where there are few people of African origin and appearance, negro (negra for females) is commonly used to refer to partners, close friends[13] or people in general independent of skin color. In Venezuela the word negro is similarly used, despite its large African descent population.

Can someone offer an explanation for Black fucking c*nt?

lol, he aint in a spanish speaking country now, he knew what he was saying. (if he did say it)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in Spanish-speaking countries such as Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay where there are few people of African origin and appearance, negro (negra for females) is commonly used to refer to partners, close friends[13] or people in general independent of skin color. In Venezuela the word negro is similarly used, despite its large African descent population.

Can someone offer an explanation for Black fucking c*nt?

lol, he aint in a spanish speaking country now, he knew what he was saying. (if he did say it)

He can barely speak English, there's a very good chance he didn't know what was meant by it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wonder if he goes around Mellwood referring to Glen Johnson as Negro.

and if so Glen Johnson should be shot for not calling him on it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said in the other thread I heard Evra said something about Suarez being South American and he replied with so what you're black in spanish. Black in spanish is Negro which would explain Evra being pissed.

There's a few very plausible reasons why Suarez could have unintentionally offended Evra, the same can't be said for you fucking black c*nt.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty, the fact that Suarez isn't somebody of sound character on the pitch I.e a Sami Hypia or Stuart Downing type, to name two Liverpool/ex players of the top of my head, and is seen to be a bit of a scumbag (no offence) the idea of him being racist or at least being capable/guilty of giving out racial abuse is also highly plausible.

either way i doubt we'll ever hear the complete truth, and hopefully it was just a missunderstanding, but Suarez's on field personailty and character will naturally lead people to believe theres legs in the story,

theres also a plausible excuse in the Terry thing tbh, so if you want to play that card, you can do it for both players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suarez on the pitch is concerned with one thing only and that's winning, this idea that he's a scumbag mostly comes from what he did at the world cup but there's no correlation between having a strong will to win and racially abusing people.

The notion that the public think the story has legs because Suarez is a scumbag for a handball and biting someone is ridiculous considering how may people have jumped to the defence of Terry a man who slept with his team mates wife and has previous for racial abuse.

Years ago Rsonist said Terry called King 'a lippy black monkey' when he got sent off at WHL and when you look at the reaction of King and Chimbonda plus the way Terry didn't object to the red card it's believable.

The media are full of shit and are doing their very best to paint Suarez as guilty whilst reserving judgement on Terry, you only have to look at the article in the mirror the other day and the picture they used to go alongside it which is nothing short of defamation of character.

there's video footage of one player and as of yet nothing but an accusation of the other but you'd never have thought it judging by the responses.

Ac_ywgFCQAAv5B8.jpg

Never mind the facts though I'm probably just suffering from victim syndrome and imagining things again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C/S about Suarez playing on the edge and winning at all costs(using all the dark arts of football)

Did Evra complain to the ref ? (He had the chance to )

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

actually it was fucking black c*nt

im sure chelsea are preparing something along the lines of this: "black c*nt in the old english etymology is derived from the viking word 'bl'aek k'nunt' an ancient foul tasting bread made from wheat and rye, which Jon was offering to anton in a whimsical fashion as a retort to his insults about wayne bridge "

lool

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suarez on the pitch is concerned with one thing only and that's winning, this idea that he's a scumbag mostly comes from what he did at the world cup but there's no correlation between having a strong will to win and racially abusing people.

The notion that the public think the story has legs because Suarez is a scumbag for a handball and biting someone is ridiculous considering how may people have jumped to the defence of Terry a man who slept with his team mates wife and has previous for racial abuse.

lol @ strong will to win.

He is a cheat bro.

He is always cheating, diving and wanting other players booked, he is filthy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Said it before but Suarez is defo that player if he's on your team you LOVE, if he aint you HATE.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah yeah yeah.

I've heard this argument put forward by Liverpool fans saying more has been made of the Suarez situation than the Terry, and ohh why has there been so many people coming out in support of Terry and not Suarez.

The first point is bullshit, as The Terry situation is huge compared to the Suarez situation in terms if media coverage,

Dunno how anyone could think otherwise,

And in terms of the support each player has or hadn't received, Suarez has been here since January, and Although he is an excellent player, from a neutral point of view he has merely cone across as a diving, win at all cost scumbag, now had he been in the country for the past decade and people had more evidence of other character traits (good ones) then more people would be coming out in support.

As opposed to Terry who yes is a scumbag, but there is also more evidence to support a claim that he also had good character traits, which led to people Like Trevor Sinclair coming out in support of him,

No one knows Suarez enough to come out in full supper and completely quash the allegations,

The same argument about this "media witch hunt" was put forward by a caller on Talksport last week, and it was laughed off by the presenters, they then went onto look through the papers, there was 9 stories on the Terry thing and only 2 talking about Suarez.

Just for a minute take your Liverpool hat and scarf off and look at the whole situation properly and you'll see that there is no media witch hunt. And you'll also understand why Terry has more people to vouch for him in this country ENGLAND than the newcomer to the country has.

It's a friggin no-brainer tbh.

Smh

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0