Goddaz Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hTHx-Adlxo I don't think it is but I'm willing to have a debate about.What is your views on this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thizz Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 NAH YOUR SEXUALITY IS A LIFESTYLE CHOICE JUST LIKE BEING A VEGETARIAN. NO ONE FORCES YOU TO AND THAT IN TURN PUTS YOU UP FOR BEING CALLED NAMES AND BEATEN UP RANDOMLY. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PROFIT MARGINS Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 This will all depend on wether u believe being gay is a choice or something u are born with so this argument will go no where. / Was there really need for this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natty Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 This will all depend on wether u believe being gay is a choice or something u are born with so this argument will go no where. exactly this argument is mad played out inb4 people bring up homosexual animals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLEAZE BALL Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 NAH YOUR SEXUALITY IS A LIFESTYLE CHOICE JUST LIKE BEING A VEGETARIAN. NO ONE FORCES YOU TO AND THAT IN TURN PUTS YOU UP FOR BEING CALLED NAMES AND BEATEN UP RANDOMLY. /topic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mame Biram Diouf Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 Race >>>> age/gender/reglion >>>>>>>>> football team >>>>> left handed people >>>>> sexuality 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLEAZE BALL Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 This will all depend on wether u believe being gay is a choice or something u are born with so this argument will go no where. think is the notion that being homo is halal can be shot down very easily by using examples of other sexual deviancy and basic logic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
local Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 I think it's all pathetic Tbh But in the PC narrative it is 1st essential to establish whether u believe 1s sexual orientation is a conscious choice Actually had a pretty heated debate with the mrs about the gay - nature or nuture argument the other day The bullshit media pushed idea that 1 is born gay pisses me off, babies are not gay and ur 12 yr old boy don't need a pushup bra I had to draw for the studies. Bare research shows that if ur sexually abused as a boy by a bloke then youre however many times liklier to identify yourself as gay when older Blows a hole in the stupid theory, also the fact most females in my experience are willing to lez down 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natty Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 yep then someone posts this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals and the nature vs nurture argument starts again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goddaz Posted May 16, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 This will all depend on wether u believe being gay is a choice or something u are born with so this argument will go no where. / Was there really need for this? about going nowhere. Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
time_bomb Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 No. And i dont agree with gay marriage. / How long before Jay-z becomes a politician? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLEAZE BALL Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 yep then someone posts this article http://en.wikipedia....vior_in_animals and the nature vs nurture argument starts again whats there to argue about? who said animals dont have preferences? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Man Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 yr wrong its not about whether gay is a choice gay is a defect, an abnormality like being born without arms race is not a defect gays should relate more closely to disabled people , not ethnic minority males 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goddaz Posted May 16, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 I don't think it matters what view point you take on the question (genetic or choice). I don't know about you lot but I can't tell by looks alone if someone is gay unless their bate with it & tbh I don't care. However, you have a very good idea as to what race someone is by looks alone. Yes discrimination is discrimination regardless of the reasons but how ppl discriminate is not the same especially in the case of race v sexuality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldCoast Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 discrimination is the same no matter what you're being discriminated against HOWEVER, homosexuality can to an extent be hidden from the public depending on how you behave, i.e closet gays, whereas race is out for everyone to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLEAZE BALL Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 discrimination is the same no matter what you're being discriminated against i dont get what youre saying discrimination is the same no matter what? do you even get what youre saying? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuffir Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 its all discrimination end of the day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
local Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 yep then someone posts this article http://en.wikipedia....vior_in_animals and the nature vs nurture argument starts again which is the animal gayness supporting? i think its pretty irrelevant tbh but "it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities." aren't intelligent animals capable of independant cognition and emotion? / now i'm gona get controversial here so listen up TBH the entire PC / communism / thought policing / your-a-natzee bandwagon, under which umbrella falls the social constructs of racial and sexual discrimination, all stemming from the holocaust, solely exists to slowly but steadily undermine the structures of civilisation, specifically in this case the national/cultural identity and values, and now with the gay push further undermining the backbone of society, the family unit, as did the evils of sexist descrimination before it, "family planning", girl power etc ppl may shrug n laugh at the idea of gay marriage and jay z advocating sodomy really affecting society but 48 years ago a young black man had a dream n now check out the president tho despite decades of affirmitive action (discrimination of whites in favour of minorities) and american children being eminemed since the 90s, apparently race relations ain't much better (trayvon, poverty rates etc) and crime in american cities (a disproportionately HUGE percentage of which is unfortunately performed by blacks) is worse than ever imagined in the 60s imagine the mixed race homo thugs of 2060 worldstarhiphop will be f*ckd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest M12 Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 Whenever any idiot raises this argument. I always point out. You can tell someone is black or Asian as soon as you see them and can make your judgements/preconceptions Before they utter a word. You cant tell that someone is gay jut by looking at them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
local Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 Whenever any idiot raises this argument. I always point out. You can tell someone is black or Asian as soon as you see them and can make your judgements/preconceptions Before they utter a word. You cant tell that someone is gay jut by looking at them. in most cases i think u obviously can but what is the relevance of this point anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PROFIT MARGINS Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 This will all depend on wether u believe being gay is a choice or something u are born with so this argument will go no where. / Was there really need for this? about going nowhere. Yes. sorry and where exactly is this going? Smh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest M12 Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 Whenever any idiot raises this argument. I always point out. You can tell someone is black or Asian as soon as you see them and can make your judgements/preconceptions Before they utter a word. You cant tell that someone is gay jut by looking at them. in most cases i think u obviously can but what is the relevance of this point anyway? The relevance is gays don't get followed round shops or disproportionately stop and searched. Some gays have certain mannerisms that make it obvious they aren't straight but the majority are clocked on to because of how they dress or behave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
local Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 This will all depend on wether u believe being gay is a choice or something u are born with so this argument will go no where. / Was there really need for this? about going nowhere. Yes. sorry and where exactly is this going? Smh debate stimulates thought, nowt wrong with it there's a few topics about jay z's newest drink or the latest jordans with ur name on it, stick to them init Whenever any idiot raises this argument. I always point out. You can tell someone is black or Asian as soon as you see them and can make your judgements/preconceptions Before they utter a word. You cant tell that someone is gay jut by looking at them. in most cases i think u obviously can but what is the relevance of this point anyway? The relevance is gays don't get followed round shops or disproportionately stop and searched. Some gays have certain mannerisms that make it obvious they aren't straight but the majority are clocked on to because of how they dress or behave. 1. why would any1 follow gays round shops bro, "gay discrimination" currently refers to not bein able to get married / adopt kids n that i believe, i don't believe gays are disproportionately comminting violent crime in america so this point is moot. if they did tho it would be "the same" yh? 2. some blacks have certain identifiable mannerisms, pop a morph suit on goddaz n 9 white blokes n i bet i could point him out the bunch walkin down the street. Same with the clothes and behaviour. again i don't understand the relevance tbh. your sayin its kl to discriminate based on clothes? here's a scenario which should help you make your stance clear i'm walkin my 2 young sons down the road in america, see bare blacks in hoodies and baggy jeans up ahead so i cross over? i discriminated on their clothes yo is that kl same scenario but i see bare gays with leather pants and sailor hats on. i cross the road again. in which scenario am i less of a nazi? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PROFIT MARGINS Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 Pmsl ok say no more I'll leave the homosexuality and racism too you don Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
local Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 no need to stifle debate g thats what the news is for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.