Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Fighting Weight

How can Carrick be overlooked

34 posts in this topic

Even after Gareth Barry became injured?

I don't quite understand it, is Hodgson saying he would play Jagielka in midfield before Carrick, or that he'd put Jones there instead?

Is there something I'm missing?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He withdrew himself.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He should be in the 23 period, but then one of the cm's get's injured....and a centreback gets brought in?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He withdrew himself.

Serious? I didn't see this

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He withdrew himself.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So confident was Carrick that he would not be picked for Euro 2012, he informed the Football Association several months ago that he did not want to be on the bench for England, which meant that Roy Hodgson had to name Jordan Henderson on the standby list instead.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jones is cover for midfield(lol)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jones :lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in all honesty the England thing right now is a huge distraction from reality,

however i feel if England had a genuinely good shot at winning the thing or getting to the final in Carrick's eyes he would not have ruled himself out,

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carrick is a victim of englands kick and rush mentality...anyone who watches him consistently and understands football will appreciate him as being an intelligent midfielder...keeps possession and puts in a shift...when he was at tottenham he used to love doing hollywood passes but when he came to man utd the coaches made him a much better player....midfield at the top level is the most important position which titles are built on & he has been in the engine room since 07/08 & look at the success we have achieved...even this season he was one of our most ocnsistent performers...Scholes summed it up in his autobiography when he said something along the lines of playing for england was frustrating because certian players would rather play a 50yard hollywood pass instead of a simple yet more effective 5 yard pass....dont blame him for retiring from england cause its a joke of a team anyway.

5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would rather have Carrick than Gerrard in my midfield

Carrick knows how to dictate the tempo and slow it down whereas Gerrard will try and play an international game at 100 MPH.

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No reason why you can't have Carrick and Stevie

In all honesty they should've built the side around Carrick from day 1

He came up with that flash cockney Joseph Cole grabbing the headlines but Carrick has had a far better career and played an important role in Utd's success as opposed to Joey at the bridge

One of things that can fuck up his game is a lack of movement from the forward players, Ronaldinho really suffered in 06 because the teletubbies (ronaldo & adriano) were static and weren't moving the fuck lumps... and they blamed Ronnie n tore down his statue the ungrateful peasants

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

carrick is a good player to have if theres naturally someone attack minded sitting next to him or in the nr 10 slot. Otherwise all you get is a crab that can make interceptions until you go 4-0 up then he starts taking shots and passing forwards and all sorts.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carricks a d*ck for that. Complete d*ck. SMH.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah England's a circus, he's better off out of it

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Built the England side around Carrick? :lmao:

Some of you man really do make me laugh. The guy is a timid f*ck

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah England's a circus, he's better off out of it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why Hodgson Should Have Fought Harder for Carrick

For nearly a year I've been harangued on Twitter by an account dedicated to attempting to point out and prove that Carrick is sh*t. It's been an amusing journey and experience, for I think, and always have thought, that Carrick is a very reliable and good footballer. Needless to say, that a year after its creation the account has a very low follower count.

With the announcement of the England squad for Euro 2012 last week I jokingly suggested to some friends that it must have been Roy Hodgson who was behind it. Carrick of course made neither the squad nor the back-up list as Gerrard, Lampard, Barry, Parker, Milner and Henderson were preferred. Internet outrage ensued, and then subsided as it seemed that Carrick had all but retired from international football. This still irks me though.

Until recently, many fans forever thought of Carrick as the man who was bought to replace Roy Keane and ultimately 'bottled it' in Rome (2009). Carrick was of course never bought to directly replace Roy - for some reason a change of style was deemed necessary and a passer was bought to replace an enforcer.

Carrick's first season was one of general learning for the squad as Ronaldo and Rooney started to blossom. His second was the one where under-appreciation of him really began though. In a side that was full of fair players who'd attempt to beat a man and take risks, he was the calming, reliable player at the heart of the side. It was whilst the side had so many entertaining players that the idea that Carrick was boring and unnecessarily slowed United's play started to emerge.

Possession is maybe somewhat underrated in England. Most English sides are based on the idea that when in possession they'll try to make the most of it in a very short space of time. Carrick is capable of quick, one-touch football as many moves this last season have shown, but he's arguably at his best when hurried and pressured. He never hesitates to play the ball to a man in space, even if that does mean passing backwards. After all, if you have the ball, the other team can't score.

Somewhat amusingly Carrick's stats for the last season show that the majority of his passes actually do go forwards. Indeed, it was he who played the most forward passes when United played away to City in the league - a stagnant performance in which he was the only United player to have performed well.

Those who watch United and Carrick closely will understand that he's so much more than a ball-player. Arguably his most work for United though is done off the ball. Time has made him clever and given him a good understanding of the game. His positioning is almost always spot on and he can read where passes are going and what opponents are doing with ease. It's no surprise that his introduction into the side in the autumn coincided with United conceding fewer goals. His shielding of the back four with well-timed tackles and interceptions proved vital.

Carrick's always adopted something of an 'unsung' label and true enough, Scholes' return epitomised that. Fergie and fans were lavish in their praise of Carrick following Scholes' comeback but failed to acknowledge that he was probably at his best before then, playing with authority as the midfield responsibility fell on his shoulders.

I'd argue that it was Carrick's consistency that allowed Scholes to settle so quickly upon his return. Many felt that Scholes allowed Carrick to play with more confidence but I think it was a mutual transaction where they both benefitted from each other. So much so, that we learnt that whilst still rash, Sholes can actually tackle. Why? Because a deeper and reliable Carrick was always back cover space meaning that Scholes would never be forced into a desperate lunge as more powerful, quicker players went past him. Instead, Paul was able to pick his moments to tackle better and time them perfectly most of the time.

So, Carrick and England. Roy Hodgson confirmed Michael had made himself unavailable for selection unless he'd be first choice. A bit arrogant some might say but somewhat understandably he wouldn't want to be fourth choice and never play. His relationship with England has been stutter to say the least. Most footballers would be happy to retire with 22 caps but his have been dragged out since 2001. He's unfortunately to be playing at the same time as the untouchable Lampard and Gerrard - it's only a recent thing that England have discovered that they necessitate an anchor man and Barry has been favoured in that role.

It made sense that Hodgson would say: "I'd have to be convinced he was better than the four I've selected" in order to try and persuade Carrick to come out of retirement so he could select him. Hodgson after all has to back the players he has picked. The odd thing is that it should have been easy for Roy, he should have been assuring Carrick that he'd be first choice. Gerrard's a good footballer but his injury-hit season has not been a good one - he's not in form. Lampard as ever has got goals but it's been an erratic season for him and his Champions League final performance was abject, it's rare to see him so overrun - he's fortunate Chelsea won the penalty shootout or his performance would be remember much like Carrick's in Rome. Barry's a league winner and had a good season but bias and sense tell me Carrick's better than him. Parker's a better footballer than he gets credit for and maybe he should be the one starting next to Carrick with Gerrard or Lampard ahead of them. Either way, Carrick should be going to Euro 2012 as first choice for England.

Having had his best season for United and arguably been their player of the year, to not see him on the plane to the Euros is crazy. Hodgson had the power to make it happen but didn't. Bizarrely, Carrick still has his critics and ardent haters. Some fans will never be able to appreciate a player who does all the simple things to a high level. Carrick knows his limitations and that's what's made him who he is - he doesn't try the things he knows he can't do. I'll finish with a quote from one of the best midfielders of today, Xavi: "Carrick gives United balance... and is a complete player" - England have lacked balance for some time. This was the chance to get it right at a big tournament and on paper, they haven't. As for United, they can enjoy England's best and most in-form midfielder all to themselves.

http://www.huffingto..._b_1542930.html

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

basically everyone is now saying what ive been saying since we signed him:

no my point was that the fa need to get a united influenced side to have a chance of competing in tournaments and they FAILED to qualify when not selecting a united player and they still choose to ignore carrick, overlook hargreeves and ignore the leadership skills of rio ferdinand....

michael_carrick.jpgEvery time i read a football article disscussing players who shouldnt play for England, who are bit part players, not good enough for top 4 clubs and or underachieveing.....one name pops up each and every timeApart from rio and cristiano, micheal carrick has probably been man utds next best player this season and after recovering from injury he has come back to dislodge fletcher, hargreeves and anderson who all jumped ahead of him with good performances them selves this season.... it has gotten to the point where i think there is some FA hate campaign out there on him for his 1 bad performance all season against Germany in the friendly at Wembley....Ive had enough of reading papers, articles, blogs and listening to the radio and podcasts of people who clearly dont watch man utd and only see ronaldos goal on highlights on sky sports news in the morning going on about him, when they are clearly wrong.I think im going to start a "Micheal Carrick is World Class" Group on Facebook and look to make a petition from then on there.....any opinions on Micheal (only those who have witnessed him play 90mins on more then one occasion this year please comment on his form) ?thank you...

topic

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Built the England side around Carrick? :lmao:

Some of you man really do make me laugh. The guy is a timid f*ck

Carrick is class To think we coulda had him for £3 mil

1239638148802.gif

9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way Phil Jones could have progressed into one of the top british centerbacks instead he's been thrown around at right back, central midfield, striker etc

He must be pissed moving to United playing as a shapeshifter for Valencia, Nani, Rafael, Berbatov

/

Re: Michael Doing it for the Essex lads Carrick,

He might regret not going to Euro's especially if England win it, could you imagine him trying to get back into the team?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think he gives a shit tbh

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
His second was the one where under-appreciation of him really began though. In a side that was full of fair players who'd attempt to beat a man and take risks, he was the calming, reliable player at the heart of the side. It was whilst the side had so many entertaining players that the idea that Carrick was boring and unnecessarily slowed United's play started to emerge.

Guilty, I hold man hands up to believing this.

But I'ma a believer now

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0