Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
kerser

Beckham vs Pirlo

44 posts in this topic

Who's got more tek

In their prime

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Backhand was technically magnificent (moreso than pirlo)

But pirlo had / has a better brain, is more influential in games and a more vital asset to his team

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno, there was a point where Beckham was United's best player arguably.

But his tekk was outrageous.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pirlo is the conductor of the team, When he is in full swing then he alone controls and dictates the game 

 

Not really comparable as Beckham is just a very technical winger 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pirlo.

 

How can you even compare the 2.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pirlo is comfortable on the ball and under pressure in a way beckham could only dream of tbh not to mention both footed

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pirlo is the conductor of the team, When he is in full swing then he alone controls and dictates the game

Not really comparable as Beckham is just a very technical winger

Beckham is a centre-midfielder still.

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

31 games 17 assists 1999-2000

31 games 14 assists 2000-2001

Apparently

That's pretty fucking influential. There was a time watching United meant. Keane receives the ball, passes it to Beckham, cross, Header from Yorke, Cole or Sheringham and a goal.

Watching Pirlo is amazing and he is a wonderful player and much better to watch but I'd pick David Beckham in his peak times over Pirlo

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Becks, but I'm fully biased

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pirlo is the conductor of the team, When he is in full swing then he alone controls and dictates the game

Not really comparable as Beckham is just a very technical winger

Beckham is a centre-midfielder still.

 

In his prime?

 

/

 

Pirlo all day long mate.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sir 

Becks, but I'm fully biased

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Pirlo is the conductor of the team, When he is in full swing then he alone controls and dictates the game

Not really comparable as Beckham is just a very technical winger

Beckham is a centre-midfielder still.

 

In his prime?

 

/

 

Pirlo all day long mate.

 

He was a centre-midfielder that happened to be on the right flank same way Ronaldo is a centre-forward playing on the left flank.

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beckham never showed anything to say he should be operating in CM in his prime.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

31 games 17 assists 1999-2000

31 games 14 assists 2000-2001

Apparently

That's pretty fucking influential. There was a time watching United meant. Keane receives the ball, passes it to Beckham, cross, Header from Yorke, Cole or Sheringham and a goal.

Watching Pirlo is amazing and he is a wonderful player and much better to watch but I'd pick David Beckham in his peak times over Pirlo

 

Hmmmmmm

 

Both had their shot at the big stage..........

 

One of them chose to do this

 

 

Whereas the other decided to do this

 

 

One went on to win the world cup, the other became a holywood socialite  

 

This shouldn't even be an argument tbh 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol. Yh in the basis if that Arguement done.

LMAO

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beckham never showed anything to say he should be operating in CM in his prime.

This basically

 

Would take pirlo in his prime. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beckham never showed anything to say he should be operating in CM in his prime.

During his first few years at United he did but with the competition for places in the middle + his crossing ability Fergie put him on the wing and the rest is history

/

Pirlo>>>Beckham

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beckham never showed anything to say he should be operating in CM in his prime.

During his first few years at United he did but with the competition for places in the middle + his crossing ability Fergie put him on the wing and the rest is history

/

Pirlo>>>Beckham

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did I really type 'Backhand' instead of Beckham? :/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

beckham at his prime played center mid but was in a shit side, for club and was wasted on the wing for country

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's true," Ferguson replied. "I was surprised that they played David in central midfield; I thought that they'd have played him wide right."

 

The second presenter, Charlie Stillitano, remarked that playing Beckham in the centre meant "you lose what he does best more than anything". Ferguson agreed again: "Yeah, his crossing."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beckham never showed anything to say he should be operating in CM in his prime.

 

 

 

1st and 3rd goal

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nah they are typical wingers switching wings to drift inside goals, he wouldnt of had that freedom to get in them positions as a CM because he would be expect to be the deep lying play maker spraying balls about.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0