Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest freestacks

SMH

14 posts in this topic

Errol Denton, of St Barnabas Road in Woodford Green, was prosecuted under the Cancer Act

10:46am Friday 21st March 2014 in News By Zachary Norman, Reporter

Erroll Denton was fined under the Cancer Act

A Harley Street practitioner who claimed he could cure cancer and HIV with ‘lifestyle changes and herbs’ was fined £19,000 yesterday.

Errol Denton, of St Barnabas Road in Woodford Green, was tried on nine counts of breaching the Cancer Act 1939, which bans advertisements offering to treat or cure cancer.

He was fined £1,000 for each offence and ordered to pay £9,821 in costs at Westminster Magistrates’ Court yesterday.

Sue Jones, Westminster City Council Trading Standards manager, said: “Sadly, the internet is littered with websites that mislead and misinform. However, to give anyone diagnosed with cancer false hope of a simple cure-all is in a twisted class of its own. To promote and advertise that deception is simply immoral and, as Mr Denton has found out, illegal.”

Denton, whose date of birth is unknown, also falsely advised women not to wear bras to fend off ‘acidity’ in the breasts which could cause cancer.

He had used his personal Twitter account to claim “cancer, diabetes, HIV, etc etc, all curable without the big pharmaceuticals”.

His website, livebloodtest.com, advertises a form of blood test involving a “very powerful microscope” which detects “imbalances”.

One article on his website claimed: “I have advised women for years not to wear bras. When they return for a blood test, the results show a reduction of acidity in the breast area,” the court heard.

The website also said: “Wake up to the fact that cancer is a disease caused by lifestyle and as such is curable by lifestyle changes and herbs.

"Natural cancer cures are being suppressed in order to cull population growth."

Denton claimed various websites bearing his name are run by a company based in Dubai.

“My representation has been damaged by internet agitators,” he claimed.

“They are the ones who made the complaint. They are sponsored by the pharmaceutical companies.”

http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/news/11093828.Harley_Street_practitioner_fined_for_claiming_herbs_cure_cancer/?ref=var_0

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

errol. has to be jamaican

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been proven time and time again that chemo etc destoy the body and maim life and that holistic and alternative remidies prolong cell life opposed to the filthy state forced indoctrinaton of creating and worsening cell damage

This case ruling is an abomination

But what do you expect from a nonce ridden ,satanic fuelld filthy perverted plague state we live in..keep paying your tv licences and tax discs folks and reading your filthy daily mail and you ill get hat you asked for

Cunts hope the guy appeals

Just o to any alternative cancer site the comments from survivos alone speak volumes

I'll listen to them not some nonce judge nonce doctor or fat bitter conditioned nurse

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the lack of w and hs phone is blinkered

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rah didnt even know there was a cancer act. that is fucked. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so the cure for cancer is patented? Baffed how this runs

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rah didnt even know there was a cancer act. that is f*cked.

The Cancer Act 1939 was an Act that originally made it the duty of all councils to secure facilities for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and to pay for travelling expenses for patients to these facilities where necessary. It lays out how the government will pay local councils to provide such treatments. And it also banned the discussion of alternative treatments, making it an offence to even suggest that something other than radioactivity and ionising radiation could possibly cure cancer. The first couple of readings of the bill in 1938-39 even forgot to include exemptions for further research into cancer.

All of the good clauses that makes it a duty for cancer to be caught early and treated have been removed in the last 70 years - replaced by the NHS acts and other acts.

ALL that is left in the act now is Section 4 which continues to turn citizens into criminals for even mentioning cancer and cure in the same sentence

https://38degrees.uservoice.com/forums/78585-campaign-suggestions/suggestions/2762993-repeal-the-cancer-act-1939-completely-repeal-cla

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so the cure for cancer is patented? Baffed how this runs

Money and control. It's that simple.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rah didnt even know there was a cancer act. that is f*cked.

The Cancer Act 1939 was an Act that originally made it the duty of all councils to secure facilities for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and to pay for travelling expenses for patients to these facilities where necessary. It lays out how the government will pay local councils to provide such treatments. And it also banned the discussion of alternative treatments, making it an offence to even suggest that something other than radioactivity and ionising radiation could possibly cure cancer. The first couple of readings of the bill in 1938-39 even forgot to include exemptions for further research into cancer.

All of the good clauses that makes it a duty for cancer to be caught early and treated have been removed in the last 70 years - replaced by the NHS acts and other acts.

ALL that is left in the act now is Section 4 which continues to turn citizens into criminals for even mentioning cancer and cure in the same sentence

https://38degrees.uservoice.com/forums/78585-campaign-suggestions/suggestions/2762993-repeal-the-cancer-act-1939-completely-repeal-cla

Disgraceful

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

so the cure for cancer is patented? Baffed how this runs

Money and control. It's that simple.

 

 

what ive been screaming

corporate rights over human rights

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its to prevent people from taking advantage of others and/or misinforming them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its to prevent people from taking advantage of others and/or misinforming them.

 

basically

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0