Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Supermalt

Bitches aint sh*t

44 posts in this topic

Ex-wife of hippy turned wind farm tycoon who became a millionaire AFTER they split wins right to fight for £2million divorce payout 
 
A former New Age traveller has won her right to fight for maintenance from her millionaire former husband more than two decades after they divorced.
Supreme Court judges ruled that Kathleen Wyatt, of Monmouthshire, had the right to apply to claim a 'modest award' from Dale Vince, who went on to launch green energy giant Ecotricity which rakes in millions every year.
 
The ruling has been branded 'unprecedented' by lawyers but experts have said it could pave the way for similar claims because there is no time limit on financial claims being made in the family courts. 
Judges had initially blocked the mother-of-four's claim for £1.9m in maintenance after Mr Vince argued he had made his wealth after their relationship ended and she had made her application too late.
 
But five judges at the Supreme Court today overturned the decision and said her application should now be assessed in the family division of the High Court. 
Vince must also pay her legal costs, which have already reached £200,000. Total costs for the case could run into £1million. 
The court heard that Ms Wyatt and Mr Vince, 53, met when they were students and married in 1981. 
Both lived a New Age traveller lifestyle but separated in the mid 1980s and finalised their divorce in 1992. 
Mr Vince went on to become a successful businessman, founding Ecotricity from his trailer when he made a wind turbine from recycled materials. 
 
From these humble beginnings came a multi-million company, which now supplies energy to more than 100,000 customers and is worth at least £57million. 
The success of Ecotricity has made Mr Vince considerable wealth, and he now lives in a £3million 18th century fort and drives a custom made electric supercar. 
Ms Wyatt, who in contrast to her ex-husband is said to have slept in a bus shelter before one of the court hearings over the last four years, lodged a claim for 'financial remedy' in 2011.
 
26888F9C00000578-0-image-a-29_1426069369
 
That troll face
 
Brehs how is this possible?

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feminism gone wild

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Madness, pure madness. I'd opt for the cheaper option of putting a hit out on her.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

£2 mill is minor tbh.

 

He can break that off and keep it pushing.

 

But the ruling is fucked.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

£2 mill is minor tbh.

 

He can break that off and keep it pushing.

 

But the ruling is f*cked.

its all about de precedent doeee

/

not that this typa shit affects me even slightly lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware prenups are not legally enforceable

I say drop 100 bands and get her dropped out

F all that other shit

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

£2 mill is minor tbh.

 

He can break that off and keep it pushing.

 

But the ruling is f*cked.

its all about de precedent doeee

/

not that this typa sh*t affects me even slightly lol

 

 

I hear that but £107 mil minus £2 mil is nothing.

 

Considering that you're watering your seeds.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware prenups are not legally enforceable

I say drop 100 bands and get her dropped out

F all that other shit

Trap then me and the woman simply don't get married

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware prenups are not legally enforceable

I say drop 100 bands and get her dropped out

F all that other sh*t

 

Then end up doing life and dying broke :S

 

Is that really the mindset here? You have £107 mil.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware prenups are not legally enforceable

I say drop 100 bands and get her dropped out

F all that other shit

 

honestly was thinking this too

 

but its not worth it really

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

£2 mill is minor tbh.

He can break that off and keep it pushing.

But the ruling is f*cked.

its all about de precedent doeee

/

not that this typa sh*t affects me even slightly lol

I hear that but £107 mil minus £2 mil is nothing.

Considering that you're watering your seeds.

Slippery slope to fuckery

You become a man of means after you divorce and she can come back and claim?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 years after ffs

Edit: 20 years

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH lads, it's his fault for thinking he could back the ting at the High Court..

 

If he had just broke bread, the bish wouldn't have won the case at such a high level. Could have slipped her a £100,000 a year for 10 years then faked his death.

 

It's not 100% her fault. Guy should have niced her before he started copping football teams.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why though? hes DIVORCED.

 

might as well as slip something for past links as well.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what exactly is the precedent here? because to me he has done nothing wrong ffs

 

fucking courts ffs

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't have kids with his links though.

 

He had two kids with this ting and regardless of what the order says, he's waste for not dropping that money for them longtime.

 

He's f*cked it up for everyone.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feminism gone wild

 

Disgusting.

Can't stand when people take what ain't theirs.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How old are those kids now? Grown.

 

Of course thats messed up, but this is basically back payments?

 

Why didnt she make a request when he was sweating?

 

If it can happen to him, it can happen to the little man as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was always a matter of time before someone one upped Ray Parlours wife.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol @ arguing for this. An absolute fuckery.

At most man should just drop some P in the kids account and done. Fuck this bish.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How old are those kids now? Grown.

 

Of course thats messed up, but this is basically back payments?

 

Why didnt she make a request when he was sweating?

 

If it can happen to him, it can happen to the little man as well.

 

They split up in 1992 or something. He started caking in 1995, made big money by 1997 and was kinda laughing for time. She probably didn't realize she could.

 

The amount of high profile court cases that have been slapped on papers since that time telling bitches they can get 50%, I'm sure she got thinking.

 

She didn't ask for 50%, she got something like 2%....

Which is MINOR to a guy with £100 mil - that's basically his annual interest payments. Why didn't he break that off time ago is what I'm saying.

 

She's the real hippy here, he turned some big time industrialist skinflint and forgot about his pickeys. It's his fault the more I think about it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Minor" money or not did she have a hand in making ANY of his P?

FOH

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just do the maths on the interest the guy makes, and realize how much of a prick he is.

 

He's still nice. She's nice. We're all worse off.
 

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0