Jump to content

ITV Leaders Debate: April 2nd - 8pm to 10pm


Don Crack

Recommended Posts

^ :lol: ignoring the obvious hyperbole in that link the UAF do seem as nasty as their right wing counterparts (EDL/NF/BNP) 

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-blame-antifascists-for-violence-1925038.html

 

Still, seems kinda hard to believe that a party as large as Labour would be so short sighted.

 

IapBtka.jpg

 

UKIP don't have the greatest reputation, so making their leader the victim of an attack would only help them, no? Especially so close to an election. Some false flag operation/house of cards level shit going on here.

 

Either that or the UAF were just being all UAFish without thinking long term, again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys think these billionaire MNC who pay people salaries to lobby and blackmail said politicians actually care about politics.

It's like me sitting here and saying BNP are a political party, or that the EDL is. They just dumb, politically uneducated and lost individuals who attach on to anything to feel a part of something. Some of these people fall for warped left ideologies and some fall for warped right ideologies. Both are as bad as each other.

However both aren't a representation of the left and right ideologies. So to bring up a poorly structured and fact lacking WordPress link and using them as an example and the lefts version of Murdochs billion pounds media empire is hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ :lol: ignoring the obvious hyperbole in that link the UAF do seem as nasty as their right wing counterparts (EDL/NF/BNP)

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-blame-antifascists-for-violence-1925038.html

Still, seems kinda hard to believe that a party as large as Labour would be so short sighted.

IapBtka.jpg

.

Labour Figures’ Bizarre Link to Paedophile Groups

Their involvement with an organisation to which two groups campaigning for the legalisation of paedophilia were affiliated has come back to challenge three leading Labour Party figures.

Before she became an MP, Harriet Harman was the legal officer in the late 1970s for the National Council for Civil Liberties. When Miss Harman joined NCCL in 1978, PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange, had already been affiliated for three years. Another group, Paedophile Action for Liberation, a Gay Liberation Front offshoot, had also been affiliated to NCCL until it was absorbed by PIE. PIE, which campaigned for adults to have sex legally with children, only broke off its relationship with NCCL when it went undercover in 1982, the same year that Harriet Harman left her NCCL post to become Member of Parliament for Peckham.

NCCL people were earlier involved in keeping the name of an NCCL council-member, Jonathan Walters, out of the People newspaper when it ran an exposé of Paedophile Action for Liberation, of which he was secretary, in 1975. The People still ran the story, but Walters was not named.

Even more extraordinary is the fact that a current Cabinet Minister was running the National Council of Civil Liberties at the time all this was going on.

The Rt Hon Patricia Hewitt MP, Secretary of State for Health, became General Secretary of NCCL in 1974. The very next year, 1975, NCCL invited the Paedophile Information Exchange and Paedophile Action for Liberation to affiliate. In the year after, 1976, the now-notorious paedophile Tom O’Carroll was invited to address the NCCL conference, which promptly voted to ‘deplore’ the use of chemical castration treatments for paedophiles.

Also in 1975, Patricia Hewitt joined the Campaign for Homosexual Equality, as a ‘straight’, in the same year that Keith Hose of the Paedophile Information Exchange addressed its second annual conference. Hose moved a motion of censure on the conference organising committee for ‘relegating paedophilia to ancillary status in conference.’ The motion was seconded by Trevor Locke, who just happened to be a member of the Executive Council of the NCCL. ‘An awareness and acceptance of the sexuality of children is an essential part of the liberation of the young homosexual,’ the motion went on. It was duly passed.

Jack Dromey, whom Harriet Harman married in 1982, and who is now Treasurer of the Labour Party, was also involved with the NCCL. He served on its Executive Committee from 1970 to 1979, so he was there when the decision to invite the two paedophile groups to affiliate was made. NCCL also set up a gay rights sub-committee at the same time, members of which included prominent paedophiles Peter Bremner (alias Roger Nash), Michael Burbidge, Keith Hose and Tom O’Carroll. And of course Walters and Locke were on the Executive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

see now I wanna see which side they voted in that recent motion to protect whistle blowers, cause I read conflicting reports into both Harman and Hewitts involvement with the PIE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading *most* posts in here is a health hazard.

 

Now that's just hurtful...

 

/

 

Harman voted to give immunity to whistle blowers. No idea what to make of that; considering there were most likely and maybe even still are paedos on all sides. That motion being blocked is depressing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i posted a link to a site that listed how every mp voted

 

in that fred about that black geeza that may have been silenced

 

cntrl f it

 

which still aint been merged btw

 

had to find the asnwer on Reddit

 

kinda nuts how in your face it is

 

just like House of Cards man, deals done behind the scenes by the Conservative/LibDem Chief Whip to get almost everyone to vote one way

 

http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2015-02-23&number=158&display=allvotes&sort=vote

 

was looking to see which way David Lammy voted, couldn't find him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading *most* posts in here is a health hazard.

Still waiting you to drop a post in this topic/on the forum that educates us.

/

Also what happened to you posting the pics you took in mayweathers gym?

Mate, go get a job. You must be pissed on that £72 per fortnight or whatever junk it is.

That 72 feels like 720 in Aldi.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's fair to say the vote if it was legit would be to leave which is probably why they have so far refused to give us the option. Pure scare mongering thrown around about the cost of us leaving, yet studies keep telling us things would be better for us being out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only appeal to me in this farce of an election is ukip actually, bcos of their foreign policy. People don't seem to understand that the most important issue to any voter should be the country's foreign policy ( which doesn't just include immigration). And on that note all the major parties are aligned in the same daemon way of continuing the status quo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...