Jump to content

Cologne Sex Attacks


Mame Biram Diouf

Recommended Posts

How is this cologne thing being linked with feminism when it's clearly because of immigratikb/arabs

 

Because the narrative revolves around a clash of 'non-civilized', patriarchal Arab/Arab men mixing with 'Enlightened', post-Feminist European societal structures.

 

It's a simple reading. Orientalism was a useful lens that we looked at the Eastern world through. Now Arabs are smashing through the lens and are outside our castle - and nothing in the Orientalist depictions of Arabs/Africans (from 16/17/18th century art, travel writing, literature etc all the way through to Hollywood depictions of Arabs and Africans, Bond films, Rambo etc.) has prepared our societies for that.

 

We like to analyze and understand from afar. That's why our learning centres are apparently so highly regarded. When Moorish Spain was sacked, Europeans rinsed the libraries for books and research and built entire universities to decode and benefit from the knowledge back home. Social science is essentially racist and Eurocentric at its core. I studied geography, and learnt fairly early on that the geographical lens was nothing more than a way to understand societies we conquered/planned to conquer. Anthropology is a classic example of racist European thinking too.

 

Ever since that time, we've figured that there's something innately European that keeps Europe (and the bastard children of Europe, Australia, the Americas etc) on top of the world. We like to omit the fact that we spend more time fighting amongst ourselves (or preparing to) than actually bothering to understand the true nature of things from any sort of meaningful sense.

All credible 'International relations' courses are at Western institutions - yet how many of us in the West believe that our politicians and diplomats really have a clue about conducting foreign relationships with any sort of honesty, or transparency?

 

Our entire educational apparatus prepares us to understand the world in a particular way (and does so fairly badly). Most people are left unable to understand the majority of situations because they didn't specialize in the subject. We have a society full of specialized idiots, essentially.

Establishment types who study PPE at Oxbridge and neglect courses on post-Colonialism, critical theory etc, react with fear when someone talks badly about Cecil Rhodes, for example. It seems baffling to those of us with an understanding of the nature of history that they'd not understand why certain Oxford students now want his statue gone. To them, there is literally no information present in their brains to allow them to see the other side.

 

The media conditions reactions to these situations. Think how long we've been getting told brown men are a danger to white girls in this country, in one way or another. You have feminists banging on about a vague, non racially specific notion of 'rape culture', which baffles most Western men - until stuff like Cologne happens. Then lightbulbs go off in people's heads.

 

Now, European men can redeem their confused, battered blue-pill egos and fight back against the newly revealed enemy - all the while loosely leaning on their layman's reading of feminism, a bit of knee-jerk Nationalism, 'European' concepts like democracy, freedom, science - even Christianity - it's all being wielded against Muslims and immigrants. PEGIDA/EDL/Britain First - great examples.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

How is this cologne thing being linked with feminism when it's clearly because of immigratikb/arabs

 

Because the narrative revolves around a clash of 'non-civilized', patriarchal Arab/Arab men mixing with 'Enlightened', post-Feminist European societal structures.

 

It's a simple reading. Orientalism was a useful lens that we looked at the Eastern world through. Now Arabs are smashing through the lens and are outside our castle - and nothing in the Orientalist depictions of Arabs/Africans (from 16/17/18th century art, travel writing, literature etc all the way through to Hollywood depictions of Arabs and Africans, Bond films, Rambo etc.) has prepared our societies for that.

 

We like to analyze and understand from afar. That's why our learning centres are apparently so highly regarded. When Moorish Spain was sacked, Europeans rinsed the libraries for books and research and built entire universities to decode and benefit from the knowledge back home. Social science is essentially racist and Eurocentric at its core. I studied geography, and learnt fairly early on that the geographical lens was nothing more than a way to understand societies we conquered/planned to conquer. Anthropology is a classic example of racist European thinking too.

 

Ever since that time, we've figured that there's something innately European that keeps Europe (and the bastard children of Europe, Australia, the Americas etc) on top of the world. We like to omit the fact that we spend more time fighting amongst ourselves (or preparing to) than actually bothering to understand the true nature of things from any sort of meaningful sense.

All credible 'International relations' courses are at Western institutions - yet how many of us in the West believe that our politicians and diplomats really have a clue about conducting foreign relationships with any sort of honesty, or transparency?

 

Our entire educational apparatus prepares us to understand the world in a particular way (and does so fairly badly). Most people are left unable to understand the majority of situations because they didn't specialize in the subject. We have a society full of specialized idiots, essentially.

Establishment types who study PPE at Oxbridge and neglect courses on post-Colonialism, critical theory etc, react with fear when someone talks badly about Cecil Rhodes, for example. It seems baffling to those of us with an understanding of the nature of history that they'd not understand why certain Oxford students now want his statue gone. To them, there is literally no information present in their brains to allow them to see the other side.

 

The media conditions reactions to these situations. Think how long we've been getting told brown men are a danger to white girls in this country, in one way or another. You have feminists banging on about a vague, non racially specific notion of 'rape culture', which baffles most Western men - until stuff like Cologne happens. Then lightbulbs go off in people's heads.

 

Now, European men can redeem their confused, battered blue-pill egos and fight back against the newly revealed enemy - all the while loosely leaning on their layman's reading of feminism, a bit of knee-jerk Nationalism, 'European' concepts like democracy, freedom, science - even Christianity - it's all being wielded against Muslims and immigrants. PEGIDA/EDL/Britain First - great examples.

 

 

What point are you making? The only relevance of feminism in this sorry saga, is the fact that most feminists didn't have a single thing to say about real 'rape culture'. Migrants are also oppressed by the evil white patriarchy so these hopelessly naive feminists can't say anything bad about them. 

 

Social sciences racist? The academe is probably more than 90 % left wing, most of them are children of 1968. The vast majority of people who study social sciences also leave very left wing. I doubt you will find a single professor who would make a solid defence of Cecil Rhodes. What a lot people cannot fathom is why you essentially want to erase history because of your feelings - it is Orwellian and Stalinist.

 

The ideas promulgated by critical theorists dominate the modern west's social, political, cultural and intellectual landscape. Most people, especially the establishment (even David Cameron), have accepted these ideas without even knowing they came from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/31/teenage-girl-made-up-migrant-claim-that-caused-uproar-in-germany

Teenage girl admits making up migrant rape claim that outraged Germany

Lil succubus

Its a 13 year old girl :/
Yep

That's why I said lil.

Succubus is the wrong word completely

So to describe a 13 yr old girl as a succubus is totally effing wrong

Such a weird mentality on this forum a lot of the time

Do u know what a sucubus is or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt she understood the gravity of what she was doing till it was too late

She was tryna get out of trouble for suttin she did at school

Plus she owned up after 3 days, a true c*nt wouldve held out a lot longer no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...