Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/21/17 in all areas

  1. Religous Councils, similar to science councils where even used to decide/vote what christanity should be and nature of christ. Decisions where made if he was human/divine or spirit etc. By the Vatican themselves. Ecmencial Councils, starting with the council of Nicea 325 A.D 21 Ecmencial council sessions from 325AD to 1965 by the Roman Vatican Empire to decide on what the faith of christianity is and isnt. And why you have the protestant split (a literal Protest against the main authority via the Martin Luther and his 95 theses movement and the beginings of german/english translations from Latin/Greek manuscripts by John Wycliffe in the 1300's) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecumenical_council#List_of_ecumenical_councils People today swear on scientific/nasa findings as hard as they believe Jesus is real. and the modern day education systems themselves stem from the same authority.
    3 points
  2. youre not a yardstick for whether the bible is true or not, and if some scientists who are bible believing scientists like sarah salviner and the many like her who's expertise in the science of space is just as good as the other guys then it remains to believe A or believe B. In genesis you described, it is written "let there be light" what light would this be? since the separation of light from the darkness occured before the formation of earth. since it is claimed that God said let there be light... it means the light was not Gods own light for example but an external element of light that was separated into NIGHT AND DAY BEFORE THE FORMATION OF THE EARTH. so what light was this existing in the heavens before the earths creation? the water on earth is calculated to be older than the sun by about 1 million years, this is according to the same science you are using to make your claims you also never mentioned that the opening statement in genesis 3 about "let there be light" is the same claim as to how the "big bang" science claims also occured by an explosion of "light" you also don't mention that there are scientific claims that the earth is 4.5 billion years old... the sun it is claimed is 4.6 billion years it has recently been "agreed" that the moon is in fact 140 million years older than scientists previously "agreed" it was. so in 10 years if they "update" their claims that the earth is actually 5 billion and the sun remaining 4.6 billion will you suddenly start running to church or something?? of course, people like you will never be aware of this info and these scientific "updates" because you're not really concerned about "the evidence" as much as you claim..instead..like me you go and find out what is available at the time you do just to buffer your argument... but at least i am not the one who first pulled out the old "oh look at what science says" nonsense that people like you do all the time when in actual fact you dont know jack about what you're talking about. my main point is to say that as long as leading astrophysicts, doctors, scientists, engineers are still bible believers then stop claiming from your own ignorant small minded thinking to act as if it is mutually exclusive to believe in both science and the bible
    3 points
  3. social media is the best thing the police could ask for like shooting fish in a barrel
    2 points
  4. draw for the bible like schwing schwing
    2 points
  5. And right here ladies and gentlemen we have a grade A fucking idiot flat geeza
    2 points
  6. Lot of bullying of our Smaddy recently. Not on at all.
    1 point
  7. Had to be the black guy stunting
    1 point
  8. What is this I'm reading? Porch is asking on how to move to a ting ? Someone hacked mans account
    1 point
  9. Man, leading scientists don't be believing in god or any higher powers, its just easier to say that than to argue with Christianity and get "burnt at the stake". Have you tried arguing with Christians? Or anyone with an alternative opinion to your own? Shits tough man.
    1 point
  10. Half the squad needs to be deleted and replaced
    1 point
  11. Won’t a make difference New players same philosophy Hopefully Man Utd get all three and leave Malcolm alone for selfish reasons.
    1 point
  12. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/12/victorian-muslims-celebrate-christmas-171214134651020.html was reading this a few days ago still
    1 point
  13. it completely flew over my head that hes muslim and they generally dont celebrate it, just saw it as a random xmas post
    1 point
  14. Donald trump's impeachment
    1 point
  15. People have learned not to ring me no more. Phones been on silent since like 2010 and even if I see you’re calling there’s a 99% chance I’ll duck it and whatsapp you 15mins later like what’s good. Had to take my voicemail off coz my parents loved leaving messages kmt
    1 point
  16. Dressing up in fancy dress is a nonce ting
    -1 points
  17. We can't prove if we left earth or not but you can see the stars with your own eyes fam. If you set your camera to a long exposure you can even pick up many of these distant galaxies yourself.
    -1 points
  18. in the flat earth thread u were convinced flat earth is bullshit yet u asking such questions now? i thought scientists had all the answers to confirm the earth is globe? you were going HAM!!! against FE
    -1 points
  19. -1 points
  20. I think Pep with this team would dominate. I would prefer Martial over Sterling, maybe over Sane aswell. Mata, Mkhitaryan would thrive under Pep. I dunno if Man City have a better 11 in all honesty.
    -2 points
×
×
  • Create New...