Jump to content

economics - globalisation


local

Recommended Posts

I gotta write an essay on a topic, preferably somethin recent and in the news at the moment so I can find enough information to fill 1500+ words, considering globalisation for example.........why are multi-national businesses moving call centres abroad? bit of a long shot postin this on here but any ideas would be appreciatedlarge up tony black for the ideas in the last economics topic i made btw.......that essays almost done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a good subject matterThe New World Order Always Knew We Would Resist"The establishment of the world community will surely exact a price - and who can tell what that price may be? - in toil, suffering, and blood." Daniel TaylorOld Thinker NewsThursday, February 28, 2008Advancing globalization and trends to world governance have become regular headlines throughout the world. As these trends continue, resistance to losses of sovereignty and globalization are increasing. This is coming as little surprise to the planners who have foreseen the rise of world government, and actively participated in its formation. Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted in his book, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, that the formation of the world system would require "sacrifices" on part of Americans that will harm America's favorable position in the world. Brzezinski states,"The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty... In the economic-technological field, some international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position." There is little doubt that Brzezinski knew exactly what kind of response this action would evoke from patriotic Americans. At the moment we are witnessing America's favorable economic position being drastically eroded as the dollar continues its freefall, with former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan's endorsement. The great dream of world governance comes at a price. Ancient ideas of national sovereignty have no place in the modern era. Sacrifices must be made. What reactions do the global planners expect?James P. Muldoon, Jr., Senior Fellow of the Center for Global Change and Governance at Rutgers University, writes in The Architecture of Global Governance that the transition to the international system will emerge out of 'chaos',"For some, the disarray of traditional relationships in international affairs indicates a dangerous deterioration of the international order and portends collapse of the system into chaos or anarchy. Others consider the turbulence of the 1990s as part of the process of evolution, an inevitable consequence of the transformation of the international system into a global system. In some respects, both are right. The international order has indeed deteriorated into 'disorder' in large measure, but there is growing evidence that a global system is emerging out of this 'chaos.'" H.G. Wells, a strong proponent of a planned world state, wrote in The New World Order in 1940, "Countless people, from maharajas to millionaires from pukka sahibs to petty ladies, will hate the new world order, be rendered unhappy by frustration of their passions and ambitions through its advent and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to estimate its promise we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people."H.G. Wells again writes in The Open Conspiracy, an earlier book written in 1928,"The establishment of the world community will surely exact a price - and who can tell what that price may be? - in toil, suffering, and blood."While speaking at a conference hosted by AKbank in Istanbul Turkey on May 31, 2007, just prior to the scheduled Bilderberg meeting, Henry Kissinger gave a speech in which he stated,"What we in America call terrorists are really groups of people that reject the international system..."Government trends analysts have taken into consideration the expanding world system and have based predictions on its impact on social, political, and economic conditions. A December 2000 CIA report titled "Global Trends 2015" outlines possible outcomes of globalization and worldwide integration. The report states,"Scenario Two: Pernicious Globalization Global elites thrive, but the majority of the world’s population fails to benefit from globalization... migration becomes a major source of interstate tension... Internal conflicts increase, fueled by frustrated expectations, inequities, and heightened communal tensions..." A report released from the U.K. Ministry of Defense, "DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme 2007-2036", states that globalization and the effective erasing of borders in an international system will cause upheaval. "Economic globalization and indiscriminate migration may lead to levels of international integration that effectively bring interstate warfare to an end; however, it will also result in communities of interest at every level of society that transcend national boundaries and could resort to the use of violence."It is not my position to advocate violent actions as a solution, as this would only worsen our situation. What can be seen from the above statements is that violence and turmoil is expected by globalist planners and analysts during the "transition" period that will carry us into the New World Order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are moving call centre jobs because they are cheaper to run in other countries. they don't have High wages and high corporation tax to pay which in turn gives them higher profits. Globalisation will in time dilute the power of the nations at the top and create new powerhouse economies in other area's for example India and South africa. First world countries are mostly against it because their financial economy hierachy is about to be history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for example.........why are multi-national businesses moving call centres abroad?
thun had the right idea in his own crackhead way
I knew that information would be too much for your little brain to handle.Just stick to the simple things like call centers init.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

for example.........why are multi-national businesses moving call centres abroad?
thun had the right idea in his own crackhead way
I knew that information would be too much for your little brain to handle.Just stick to the simple things like call centers init.
lolit was an interestin read....but I'm tryna get marks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do something on the current housing market or even better the credit crunch with the fears of recession, caused by these dumbass banks lending to irresponsible people.

for example.........why are multi-national businesses moving call centres abroad?
thun had the right idea in his own crackhead way
I knew that information would be too much for your little brain to handle.Just stick to the simple things like call centers init.
Them American spellings there? Thought you were anti-US.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do something on the current housing market or even better the credit crunch with the fears of recession, caused by these dumbass banks lending to irresponsible people.
for example.........why are multi-national businesses moving call centres abroad?
thun had the right idea in his own crackhead way
I knew that information would be too much for your little brain to handle.Just stick to the simple things like call centers init.
Them American spellings there? Thought you were anti-US.
Im not anti-US.I just dont support what there government is doing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah I get you still... Bush in power, woman in power, black man in power... it just won't make that much of a difference (anyone's better than Bush right now though). Puppets on the frontline, the real 'goons' in the shadows, pulling all the real strings.Steffidge - sorry didn't notice the topic was Economic Gloablisation so scrap the housing market, but if you really wanted you could do it if you played it real clever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah I get you still... Bush in power, woman in power, black man in power... it just won't make that much of a difference (anyone's better than Bush right now though). Puppets on the frontline, the real 'goons' in the shadows, pulling all the real strings.
Spot on
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...