Boris Johnson

[Eskay Jones]

Ken >> tbh

Ken was the downfall of this once glorious city. f*ck Ken and Boris.

[Black Ant]

giant douche or turd sandwich

[Thun]

Ken was the downfall of this once glorious city. f*ck Ken and Boris.

C/S

[Guest Esquilax]

giant douche or turd sandwich

Tbh.Also, Angelo, leave the horses alone!...Leave em alone!

[Grafter]

they gna start chargin us to breath soon

[Grafter]

Ken was the downfall of this once glorious city. f*ck Ken and Boris.

C/S

[Percy]

Lol, horses

[Drift]

Ken >> tbh

Ken was the downfall of this once glorious city. f*ck Ken and Boris.

is it? what did ken do?

[Eskay Jones]

Ken >> tbh

Ken was the downfall of this once glorious city. f*ck Ken and Boris.

is it? what did ken do?

What didnt he do.1. C.C Charge to reduce congestion, congestion goes up.2. Crime rate goes up in every sector.3. Parking Permitsthats just 3.

[Guest Tosser]

I thought that Angelo fag lived in Oz anyway?Either way, this is a congestion reducing manoeuvre and as such I'm all for it.No reason for car in many parts of Central London

[Meticulous]

Wont work.

[Superstition]

What didnt he do.1. C.C Charge to reduce congestion, congestion goes up.2. Crime rate goes up in every sector.3. Parking Permitsthats just 3.

Neither of these are true. Crime rate went down under Ken, and congestion was reduced spectacularly, the charge was much more effective than anticipated

[Guest Tosser]

Ken >> tbh

Ken was the downfall of this once glorious city. f*ck Ken and Boris.

is it? what did ken do?

What didnt he do.1. C.C Charge to reduce congestion, congestion goes up.2. Crime rate goes up in every sector.3. Parking Permitsthats just 3.

Not strictly true.

[Mr.Skeng]

What didnt he do.1. C.C Charge to reduce congestion, congestion goes up.2. Crime rate goes up in every sector.3. Parking Permitsthats just 3.

Neither of these are true. Crime rate went down under Ken, and congestion was reduced spectacularly, the charge was much more effective than anticipated

If it was so effective why did they have to up the price from £5 to £8.

[Guest Tosser]

What didnt he do.1. C.C Charge to reduce congestion, congestion goes up.2. Crime rate goes up in every sector.3. Parking Permitsthats just 3.

Neither of these are true. Crime rate went down under Ken, and congestion was reduced spectacularly, the charge was much more effective than anticipated

If it was so effective why did they have to up the price from £5 to £8.

Errr...cos they knew people would have to pay it?

[Thun]

The congestion charge was a very nasty concept You can either afford to pay it or poor people have to f*ck off the roadsKen is a traitor much like the rest of them selling out this country

[Guest Tosser]

The congestion charge was a very nasty concept You can either afford to pay it or poor people have to f*ck off the roadsKen is a traitor much like the rest of them selling out this country

LOL yeah, cos poor people are the majority who recreationally drive through central London.

[Mr.Skeng]

What didnt he do.1. C.C Charge to reduce congestion, congestion goes up.2. Crime rate goes up in every sector.3. Parking Permitsthats just 3.

Neither of these are true. Crime rate went down under Ken, and congestion was reduced spectacularly, the charge was much more effective than anticipated

If it was so effective why did they have to up the price from £5 to £8.

Errr...cos they knew people would have to pay it?

Errr.... so you're agreeing with me thenPeople still drove in to work and paid the charge without the actual congestion being reduced.idiot

[Thun]

The congestion charge was a very nasty concept You can either afford to pay it or poor people have to f*ck off the roadsKen is a traitor much like the rest of them selling out this country

LOL yeah, cos poor people are the majority who recreationally drive through central London.

Well they certainly have got rid of many poor familys who dont drive around central London anymoreLOL at loving to pay £8 to use the roads in central London and then they want to complain when they charge them to pay by the mile

[Superstition]

Errr.... so you're agreeing with me thenPeople still drove in to work and paid the charge without the actual congestion being reduced.idiot

Congestion was reduced: number of journeys through central fell dramatically, average speeds were raised, average journey times were shortened, public transport usage swelled. Of course some people still drive into London, which makes the subsequent price bump/westward expansion an effective revenue-raising method

[Thun]

im pretty sure the newest report into the cc showed that congestion went up in the roads SURROUNDING the c c zone hence pollution went up im sur eit cost the economy a fair bit too ...dnt let these eco hipppys try 2 fool you.. it serves no purpose other than that of a stealth tax these white bastards in their stone towers impose on us underlingsand we suck the congestion charge's d*ck the same way we suck the 50% tax rates d*ck...we jus suck d*ck all day no homo and moan a bit but then get bak 2 suckin on the phallus of a bloated corrupt socialist mess of a goverment

People are loving there servitudeThere begging master to tax them more and want to lick boots of authorityThey want to serve there government

[Superstition]

im pretty sure the newest report into the cc showed that congestion went up in the roads SURROUNDING the c c zone hence pollution went up im sur eit cost the economy a fair bit too ...dnt let these eco hipppys try 2 fool you.. it serves no purpose other than that of a stealth tax these white bastards in their stone towers impose on us underlingsand we suck the congestion charge's d*ck the same way we suck the 50% tax rates d*ck...we jus suck d*ck all day no homo and moan a bit but then get bak 2 suckin on the phallus of a bloated corrupt socialist mess of a goverment

I'm sure you're right, but reducing pollution wasn't an explicit aim of the scheme, reducing congestion was. And it's not a stealth tax, it's a very direct oneAgree with the last part too. Everyone bitches, but then it's slurp slurp slurp

[Guest Tosser]

What didnt he do.1. C.C Charge to reduce congestion, congestion goes up.2. Crime rate goes up in every sector.3. Parking Permitsthats just 3.

Neither of these are true. Crime rate went down under Ken, and congestion was reduced spectacularly, the charge was much more effective than anticipated

If it was so effective why did they have to up the price from £5 to £8.

Errr...cos they knew people would have to pay it?

Errr.... so you're agreeing with me thenPeople still drove in to work and paid the charge without the actual congestion being reduced.idiot

The calculation would have been some people will stop, but most will continue, so more money.c*nt

[VENOM]

the congesttion charge was or is not a nasty concept. London was getting way too clogged and needed a changeit has also reduced traffic a bit. theres nothing wrong with the congestion charge. the problem is trying to sneakily extend it to all corners of the city, and other shchupid charges.boris johnson over ken anyday tho

[Mr.Skeng]

What didnt he do.1. C.C Charge to reduce congestion, congestion goes up.2. Crime rate goes up in every sector.3. Parking Permitsthats just 3.

Neither of these are true. Crime rate went down under Ken, and congestion was reduced spectacularly, the charge was much more effective than anticipated

If it was so effective why did they have to up the price from £5 to £8.

Errr...cos they knew people would have to pay it?

Errr.... so you're agreeing with me thenPeople still drove in to work and paid the charge without the actual congestion being reduced.idiot

The calculation would have been some people will stop, but most will continue, so more money.c*nt

I never mentioned anything about profit. I was agreeing with Eskay Jones that the congestion charge wasnt effective at reducing traffic in central.