Jump to content

The Colour of the worst crime...Child sex crime.


MARVELL

Recommended Posts

..........is clearly white. despite all the crossing of road, mistreatment by feds, and prejudice by stupid white ladies,

what we should all be doing is crossing the road, clutching onto our kids...any kids when a white man is around.

when it comes to terror, they will talk about the race, knife, gun, "gang" crime, they will publish race

when it comes to Afgoons chirpsing chavs, they will publish race

yet when the worst of the worst crime stats are published...which will obviously be 99% white... we dont see any stats

as if we need to.

and this crime is 30x more prevalent than gun, knife, street crime

next time they want to cuss mohammed...remind them of this fact

One child sex attack was reported every 20 minutes last year, equivalent to 444 attacks a week, according to shocking police figures released today.

About 23,000 children were reported victims in England and Wales during 2010/11 but fewer than 10 per cent of cases ended in a conviction.

There were 4,973 alleged victims aged ten and under, including 1,472 younger than six.

article-2124805-12765A11000005DC-19_634x668.jpg

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest petercrotch

I find it hard to believe that only 1 crime was committed in london but anyway the vast majority of whites are not sex offenders to be fair but good argument to be used if anyone wants to bring up the old "black people get stop and search because they commit the most violent crime" line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..........is clearly white.

you've really shot yourself in the foot with this 1

lets break it down, we'll compare the top 3's ethnic demographic with the bottom 3, using the latest data (2010) from here

http://www.guardian....n-england-wales

top 3 areas with the most cases, wither over a 1000 cases a year, are MET (greater london), Thames Valley (oxfordshire, buckinghamshire and berkshire) and West Yorkshire

greater london - 59%: white

Thames valley - oxfordshire 85%: white, buckinghamshire: 82% white, west berkshire: 88% white

West Yorkshire - 81% white

the lowest 3

Cumbria: 95% white

Bedfordshire: 87% white

staffordshire: 93% white

the correlation is clearly the more ethnic minorities = more child sex abuse

Check out the whitest area in the UK, Gwent - 247 cases. Compare it to the MET area which is the least white in the UK - 3420 cases.

It carries on with West Midlands coming in 4th highest, then Manchester, then Lancashire, fully correlating in order with the number of non-whites

All the 95%+ white areas remain at the bottom of the list

LOL what proposterous explanation do you have for this then marv

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most child sex crimes go on inside the child's own home, with the perpetrators being the child's own relative(s), ergo, normally the same race as the child. So basically, no race is more/less likely to be a paedo.

incorrect apparently

I find it hard to believe that only 1 crime was committed in london but anyway the vast majority of whites are not sex offenders to be fair but good argument to be used if anyone wants to bring up the old "black people get stop and search because they commit the most violent crime" line

not a good argument obviously

the City of London means the financial district, about 1 sq mile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and while we're at it.....bit unrelated.......but marvell's makin a reference to the 'Colour of Crime' and crotch is on about blacks commiting the most violent crime

the state of New Jersey have recently released their State and County Arrest Summary for 2010, in which they have a section labelled Total Arrests by Race

this doesn't contain "twisted facts" or "bullshit stats" and wasn't composed by any KKK member

yet it shows that while Blacks are only 13.7% of the population of New Jersey they are responsible for 68% of homicide, 46% of rape, 63% of robbery, 45% of aggravated assault, and 35% of burglary.

here it is http://www.njsp.org/info/ucr2010/pdf/2010_sect_3.pdf

shame they don't have a section on child sex abuse eh

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

more BS from the local sex offender...

lol@ your correlation, where did you wing that one from? so an area has to be 95% and above white population for there to be little sex crime?

yet, its not rocket science to think that if Ethnic minorities made up even more than 10% of the sexual offender arrests and convictions in any area

the daemons in the Met would have provided their brothers in the Media with such "alarming stats"

The same way the recent Operation Ore carried out by the met discovered everyone from magistrates to corporate lawyers, and businessmen

over 10,000 cases of paedophilia apparently carried out by men from ALL sections of society, we got to hear of their jobs and positions

but not ONE mention of the predominance or %age dispersion of race. whenever that happens its clear that it was overwhelmingly white

so you're talking out your arse again to think that one or two areas that have very high white population have little sex offences

and as for your New Jersey stats, again you're completely lying and creating figures

None of those %ages you quoted are correct

however you conveniently missed the SEX OFFENCES stats in the same article that says

70% of the total people arrested were white
Link to comment
Share on other sites

marvell, as your aware, the media is discouraged from commenting on race unless its exclusively white perpertrators, thats why they were told to remian quite on the asian pedo rings in blackpool, thats why you won't see those New Jersey stats on American news

look at the areas with the highest number of incidents, ask yourself why those with the lowest are situated far away from any areas with high ethnic populations i.e the very north of england and all of wales?

why are the highest all in areas with extremely high ethnic populations or situated next door to them?

i base my hypothesis on the facts and evidence. what are you basing your opinion on?

70% of the total people arrested for sex offences were white

78% of the population of New Jersey's population are white, that means they're under represented by 8%, meaning ethnics make up the rest. Prooving yourself wrong again. You also havn't used the next line in that report to filter out the 31% "hispanics" that fall under the white label, meaning whites only account for 39% of sex offences.

Don't you get tired of making yourself look stupid with your incorrect racist nonsense?

What are the stats saying in Africa for certain countrys?

/thread

swear in Nigeria n South Africa, the people believe that havin sex with a virgin will cure them of aids

jus found this: http://www.nytimes.c...?pagewanted=all

In the 12 months ending in March 2005, the police reported more than 22,000 cases of child rape in South Africa.

not including incidents of child pornography like your article, jus bare rape, in a country with millions less population than the UK, n a country where the police will no doubt be a 100 times less vigilant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest petercrotch

At the risk of causing offence i think we can all agree that pedophilia is far more common in europe than in africa even though africa is bigger .

Factums . No racism . We have all had an emily or holly in our school who at age 12 was dating a 24 year old .

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the risk of causing offence i think we can all agree that pedophilia is far more common in europe than in africa even though africa is bigger .

Factums . No racism . We have all had an emily or holly in our school who at age 12 was dating a 24 year old .

no, how can anyone agree with that?

you've just seen those stats from South Africa in 2005

here's 1 from 2008: "437 young children were raped this month in just one SA province, KwaZulu-Natal"

Read more: http://digitaljourna...9#ixzz1t3JVgPkT

this from 2009: "One in four men in South Africa have admitted to rape and many confess to attacking more than one victim"

http://www.guardian....ica-rape-survey

2010: "Like a third of the 200,000 children who are raped in South Africa every year, Fuzeka, 12, was attacked by a close relative."

http://www.independe...pe-1974578.html

you clearly have no idea what your talking about crotch

of course, this doesn't mean the white man is not directly responsible for the actions of black people

Local politician Nomvula Mokanyane says that under apartheid, African men were stripped of power and prestige. Now they take their revenge on women, and on tiny children.

but what you are sayin about europe and africa is stupidly ignorant and wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im honestly worried about marvell, he needs serious help.

but lol at how local has destroyed him in here, bet he was buzzing with spride when he made this thread

as always, he was so excited at the possibility of another chance to prove how evil and disgusting whitey is, that he failed to see the obvious flaws in his argument

even when his argument is as stupid as "sex offences existing in the UK = you should clutch onto your kids infront of white men"

if u look at the Cumbria figure its 123, lets put this into context, we'll compare the whitest region in england with least whitest

"The British county of Cumbria is located in North West England and has a population of 496,200"

"There were an estimated 7,556,900 official residents in Greater London as of mid-2007[update]."

So we'll find how many times larger LDNs population is

7,557,000 / 500,000 = 15 (all rounded figures)

times Cumbria's figure by 15

123 x 15 = 1,845

1,845 compared to LDN's 3420. A difference of nearly 1,600 child sex incidents.

What is the only logical reason that perverse white men down south in london are rapin more children than the perverse white men up north in Cumbria? the weather? too much rain for rape? culture? tradition?

the answer lies in the number of non-whites. the fact that Cumbria has 5% non-white white residents and London has 40% non-white makes up the difference.

Thats approximately 1 extra child sex abuse victim for every 1,654 non-white residents in case anyone was wondering.

maths>>>

btw marv all the new jersey stats i wrote are on point, they're not written in words but the stats all shown clearly in the table, if your havin trouble workin any 1 out in particular let me know and i can break it down for u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PROFIT MARGINS

Was someone really trying to say child sex crimes are worse in England than they are in Africa?

Some people just need an education

PMSL

venom gonna feel di pain from di post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

more local bullshit... you mentioned nigeria and south africa and all your info is about SA

SA has a uniquely high rate of child sexual offences based on the illiteracy regarding AIDS and its alleged cures

its not an excuse but South africa's and southern africa stats account for an overwhelming part of all of Africa

for the very same reasons.

The Article about the hispanics did not specify that Hispanics were labelled under 'white'

when something says 70% of the total arrests were white, 20% black and 3% asian

and 30% of the arrests were Hispanic and 68% non hispanic...this does not explain that the 30% came from the WHITE population label

there has never been a time in the UK were the press did not target a specific ethnic minority group to alarm people about their crimes

every crime that involves significant amounts of Ethnic minorities gets sensationalised...EVERY SINGLE ONE

so again you're talking nonsense about the media hiding crimes for fear of being seen as racist!!! thats the motto OF a racist.

child sexual abuse in Thailand, Philippines, and malaysia and parts of the carribean all have significantly high numbers of white men involved

especially in thailand where they dint even account for 1% of the population

Link to comment
Share on other sites

more local bullshit... you mentioned nigeria and south africa and all your info is about SA

SA has a uniquely high rate of child sexual offences based on the illiteracy regarding AIDS and its alleged cures

its not an excuse but South africa's and southern africa stats account for an overwhelming part of all of Africa

for the very same reasons.

there you go, as normal, ignoring the fact your obviously wrong and focusing on an irrelevant point

i heard of a myth aids would be cured by sex with a virgin was believed in Nigeria n SA

then i went on to use SA as an example of a country with stupidly high cases of child rape, and rape in general tbh

you want info on Nigeria? google has a tonne of it. all off front page

The police began to notice an increase in child rape in 2004, he said, adding that it became pronounced in 2005 and then reached an alarming rate in 2007.

In the last six months, police in Kano, the commercial hub of northern Nigeria, recorded 54 cases of child rape and made 60 related arrests. “In some cases the victims are gang-raped,” Abba said.

"Rotimi explained that in legal terms, defilement has to do with an adult having sexual relations with a child below the age of 12 while rape has to do with an adult having sexual relations with a child between the ages of 13 and 17."

rape is rife all over the continent tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...