-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Latest Activity
-
- 2 replies
- 13778 views
-
- 7 replies
- 20828 views
-
- 59 replies
- 120928 views
-
New single & video - Tru Trilla "End the Day" ft Ruste Juxx & Julius Luciano of Shoe Gang
By urbanelite, in Music
- tru trilla
- ruste juxx
- (and 18 more)
- 0 replies
- 5518 views
-
- 0 replies
- 952 views
-
Recommended Posts
50m fine for city
CL squad reduced to 21 players, 8 of which have to be locally trained.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mame Biram Diouf
Would people like Milner, Barry and Hart count?
Might have to double Richards wages and make him stay
Cunts
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fresh
Very good point
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TF S4DK
They could, you can have losses, just not dumb losses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Infamous
Excellent news. They need to stay strong and not over turn it
These rules need to come into play. Man cant be having 30m players off the bench like this is FM file in 2019
Chelsea need to be fined/limited in their signings too
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thizz
Why?
We are financially clear buddy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Infamous
Im just salty bruh
All that talent stock piling needs to be punished tbh
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zizouz
stockpiling that talent is a way around FFP, just look at the de Bruyne sale as an example
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Infamous
Along with this poaching 14 year olds before they sign a Youth contract stuff.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TF S4DK
I very much doubt you can stop the stock piling in relation to FFP tbh.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zizouz
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10152361939675768&set=vb.656115767&type=3&theater
Quinn >
talking a lot of sense
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kompressor
So much real talk.
As much as United are openly waiting eagerly for FFP to come into play I can't help but think its just a power move by the bigger clubs to keep the status quo in place.
It's totally ridiculous that at United and Arsenal you have owners who don't put money into their clubs at all and the fans have no love for sitting pretty and they're ok. Whilst at City you have a loved owner who has only put money in, being vilified by UEFA.
Football is eating itself, but hey. PSG & City are dibby dibby clubs who nobody will listen too.
I like nostalgia as much as anyone else but I can't say I dream of a return to watching United and Arsenal fighting for the league each season in a two horse race. With one other making an appearance in the debate every few years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zizouz
UEFA haven't even - afaik - answered the question of what happens to the money they get through fines
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kompressor
Champagne and Ice cream at parties I presume.
A few months ago I heard how much it costs to put on the draws for UEFA competitions. I was astounded by the price. I guess they'll put it towards that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Flojo
The money clubs are fined is apparently withheld from their CL revenue and invested at grass roots level.
/
Quinn makes some good points but it's pretty clear that UEFA are concerned about billionaire owners gradually turning the game into their own little competition in which the clubs able to afford bigger financial losses become the powerhouses. City have spent over £500 million net in 5 years comfortable with the knowledge that if it doesn't work out they can loan the player out, subsidise their wages and move on to the next like it never happened.
Quinn wants to give City credit for their recent transfer policy but were it not for FFP they wouldn't have been nowhere near as prudent because there would be no incentive to be.
Trying to compare Manchester Utd's sponsorship deals to City's is ludicrous, the former is one of the biggest sports brands in the world with a huge fanbase so it's only logical their sponsorship deals are substantially bigger.
Also the way he skimmed over the nature of their sponsorship deals as if it was just sour grapes from supporters of other clubs was a joke, these deals are completely bogus and nothing more than a way for the club yo get around FFP. They couldn't get anything close to the sponsorship deals they're getting from companies that weren't affiliated with the UAE.
I like the fact that City have invested in the local area and rejuvenated it in a way that the local authorities have failed to but it's a dangerous road to go down when you start factoring in things that extend beyond the game as a way of justifying a team breaking the rules. I'm sure that investment in facilities doesn't go against you in FFP anyway?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kompressor
Something definitley has to be done to curb/limit billionaire involvement but IMO this ruling is just a case of the big boys coming together and saying we have to stop any of these other clubs impacting upon the status quo. From a selfish point of view I should be all for it but if you were a supporter of a Stoke City or a West Ham, this is basically UEFA saying "The one way you guys were ever gonna be successful and a big deal is now gone"
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Benicio del Toney
I think Man City shoulda been deducted points tbh.
Not staying within the financial regulations is cheating, plain and simply.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thizz
Harry Redknapp: QPR boss critical of financial fair play rules
Harry Redknapp has criticised the Financial Fair Play system that could throw QPR's future into doubt if they are relegated from the top flight.
Chairman Tony Fernandes has indicated he would appeal against a fine from the Football League, which would be around £54m if losses for Rangers' promotion season matched the £65.4m in 2012-13.
If the club don't pay, the league can block entry to its competitions.
"Fair play would be everyone having £30m a year to spend," said Redknapp.
Rangers are expected to release their 2013-14 financial figures at some point before the end of November.
It has been argued relegated clubs are at greater risk of FFP penalties due to the huge wage costs associated with the Premier League.
QPR, who visit Manchester United on Sunday, were promoted to the top-flight after being relegated at the end of the 2012-13 season.
Their swift return to the top tier had the potential to cause the Football League (FL) difficulties as they could be left trying to collect fines from clubs who are no longer in their jurisdiction.
The FL governs the Championship, League One and League Two, as well as the Capital One Cup and Johnstone's Paint Trophy.
"To make it fair play we should be able to spend as much as Manchester United have spent before we play them on Sunday," added Redknapp on Friday.
"That would be fair play, wouldn't it?
"What is fair play because one club can spend £200m on a team and another might spend £8-10m on their team. That's not fair play really, is it?"
Meanwhile, Redknapp says he could sign a new contract with QPR on Friday or Saturday.
The 67-year-old former Tottenham manager has been in charge at Loftus Road since November 2012.
"Maybe today or tomorrow it will get done," said Redknapp.
/
Gotta agree with him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nidge Weasle
why are we giving him a new contract
whhhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Link to comment
Share on other sites