Jump to content

SMH


Guest freestacks

Recommended Posts

Guest freestacks

Errol Denton, of St Barnabas Road in Woodford Green, was prosecuted under the Cancer Act

10:46am Friday 21st March 2014 in News By Zachary Norman, Reporter

Erroll Denton was fined under the Cancer Act

A Harley Street practitioner who claimed he could cure cancer and HIV with ‘lifestyle changes and herbs’ was fined £19,000 yesterday.

Errol Denton, of St Barnabas Road in Woodford Green, was tried on nine counts of breaching the Cancer Act 1939, which bans advertisements offering to treat or cure cancer.

He was fined £1,000 for each offence and ordered to pay £9,821 in costs at Westminster Magistrates’ Court yesterday.

Sue Jones, Westminster City Council Trading Standards manager, said: “Sadly, the internet is littered with websites that mislead and misinform. However, to give anyone diagnosed with cancer false hope of a simple cure-all is in a twisted class of its own. To promote and advertise that deception is simply immoral and, as Mr Denton has found out, illegal.”

Denton, whose date of birth is unknown, also falsely advised women not to wear bras to fend off ‘acidity’ in the breasts which could cause cancer.

He had used his personal Twitter account to claim “cancer, diabetes, HIV, etc etc, all curable without the big pharmaceuticals”.

His website, livebloodtest.com, advertises a form of blood test involving a “very powerful microscope” which detects “imbalances”.

One article on his website claimed: “I have advised women for years not to wear bras. When they return for a blood test, the results show a reduction of acidity in the breast area,” the court heard.

The website also said: “Wake up to the fact that cancer is a disease caused by lifestyle and as such is curable by lifestyle changes and herbs.

"Natural cancer cures are being suppressed in order to cull population growth."

Denton claimed various websites bearing his name are run by a company based in Dubai.

“My representation has been damaged by internet agitators,” he claimed.

“They are the ones who made the complaint. They are sponsored by the pharmaceutical companies.”

http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/news/11093828.Harley_Street_practitioner_fined_for_claiming_herbs_cure_cancer/?ref=var_0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its been proven time and time again that chemo etc destoy the body and maim life and that holistic and alternative remidies prolong cell life opposed to the filthy state forced indoctrinaton of creating and worsening cell damage

This case ruling is an abomination

But what do you expect from a nonce ridden ,satanic fuelld filthy perverted plague state we live in..keep paying your tv licences and tax discs folks and reading your filthy daily mail and you ill get hat you asked for

Cunts hope the guy appeals

Just o to any alternative cancer site the comments from survivos alone speak volumes

I'll listen to them not some nonce judge nonce doctor or fat bitter conditioned nurse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rah didnt even know there was a cancer act. that is fucked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rah didnt even know there was a cancer act. that is f*cked.

The Cancer Act 1939 was an Act that originally made it the duty of all councils to secure facilities for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and to pay for travelling expenses for patients to these facilities where necessary. It lays out how the government will pay local councils to provide such treatments. And it also banned the discussion of alternative treatments, making it an offence to even suggest that something other than radioactivity and ionising radiation could possibly cure cancer. The first couple of readings of the bill in 1938-39 even forgot to include exemptions for further research into cancer.

All of the good clauses that makes it a duty for cancer to be caught early and treated have been removed in the last 70 years - replaced by the NHS acts and other acts.

ALL that is left in the act now is Section 4 which continues to turn citizens into criminals for even mentioning cancer and cure in the same sentence

https://38degrees.uservoice.com/forums/78585-campaign-suggestions/suggestions/2762993-repeal-the-cancer-act-1939-completely-repeal-cla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rah didnt even know there was a cancer act. that is f*cked.

The Cancer Act 1939 was an Act that originally made it the duty of all councils to secure facilities for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and to pay for travelling expenses for patients to these facilities where necessary. It lays out how the government will pay local councils to provide such treatments. And it also banned the discussion of alternative treatments, making it an offence to even suggest that something other than radioactivity and ionising radiation could possibly cure cancer. The first couple of readings of the bill in 1938-39 even forgot to include exemptions for further research into cancer.

All of the good clauses that makes it a duty for cancer to be caught early and treated have been removed in the last 70 years - replaced by the NHS acts and other acts.

ALL that is left in the act now is Section 4 which continues to turn citizens into criminals for even mentioning cancer and cure in the same sentence

https://38degrees.uservoice.com/forums/78585-campaign-suggestions/suggestions/2762993-repeal-the-cancer-act-1939-completely-repeal-cla

Disgraceful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...