Jump to content

Romelu Lukaku


Mame Biram Diouf

Recommended Posts

Wasnt ready for chelsea yet

First tocuh wasnt good enough

Chelsea style only fits a certain type of striker the old school english target man, dion dublin, kevin davies etc would excel there more then the likes of sturridge, torres and shevchenko

Bagged 17 league goals at wba

15 last season

And hes only 21 playing on the wing this season

I dont rate him that highly but loads of people were on his nuts 18months ago are now saying hes dead food

21 year old with 40 prem goals in 100 games is very good much better than the likes of sturridge Who has 59 in 150 and last season boosted that and he was mid 20s

 

I said this countless times but scoring goals for a one side in the perm doesn't mean you can replicate it for another. Especially when it's a top side

 

He wasn't and never will be ready for Chelsea as he doesn't have the quality

 

Not just Chelsea by the way. He's not good enough for Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool Citeh either

 

lol @ thinking Torres, Shevchenko at their peak couldn't play for Chelsea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Wasnt ready for chelsea yet

First tocuh wasnt good enough

Chelsea style only fits a certain type of striker the old school english target man, dion dublin, kevin davies etc would excel there more then the likes of sturridge, torres and shevchenko

Bagged 17 league goals at wba

15 last season

And hes only 21 playing on the wing this season

I dont rate him that highly but loads of people were on his nuts 18months ago are now saying hes dead food

21 year old with 40 prem goals in 100 games is very good much better than the likes of sturridge Who has 59 in 150 and last season boosted that and he was mid 20s

 

I said this countless times but scoring goals for a one side in the perm doesn't mean you can replicate it for another. Especially when it's a top side

 

He wasn't and never will be ready for Chelsea as he doesn't have the quality

 

Not just Chelsea by the way. He's not good enough for Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool Citeh either

 

lol @ thinking Torres, Shevchenko at their peak couldn't play for Chelsea

 

 

they couldnt, why you think chelsea is a graveyard for strikers ever since mourinho took over

 

i agree with the scoring goals thing, but he could defo play for united, arsenal and pool 

 

we dont know yet with lukaku hes still 21 and improving can go either way still(with regards to the price he cost)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasnt ready for chelsea yet

First tocuh wasnt good enough

Chelsea style only fits a certain type of striker the old school english target man, dion dublin, kevin davies etc would excel there more then the likes of sturridge, torres and shevchenko

Bagged 17 league goals at wba

15 last season

And hes only 21 playing on the wing this season

I dont rate him that highly but loads of people were on his nuts 18months ago are now saying hes dead food

21 year old with 40 prem goals in 100 games is very good much better than the likes of sturridge Who has 59 in 150 and last season boosted that and he was mid 20s

 

Sturridge never struggled with basic things like controlling the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

He is good for his age but needs to stop talking and focus on consistency

What do you mean by good for his age?

There isn't a 21 year old CF better than him

 

 

Origi is already better than him and he's 19.

 

Vietto is better than him too.

 

Add Dybala to that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys is rating him based on what he saw at the WC(some dusty cameo) and more importantly he belongs to Liverpool.

If he has watched Origi play for Lille for the last two seasons like I have

Then he won't have the audacity to bring his name up in this thread

 

I rate him on his technique which is >>>>

 

And he is only 19

 

I don't expect him to be a goalscoring phenom at that age, only a few can be 

 

Owen Fowler R9 Raul and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dybala needs another season so does Kane and Vietto

Lukaku has had two good seasons

Guys mentioned above have had half a season

As for Origi he is average and there is no way he is better than Lukaku

I watch a lot of Lille

 

Why do they need another season?

 

You can tell from when you first watch them that they're different gravy to Lukaku ability wise.

 

Kane already better than him both scoring and as a footballer.

 

I think Lukaku still has a small chance to be top class when he hits 26, 27 though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lukaku bagged 17 league goals for west brom aged 18/19

 

Origi has 11 career goals 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dybala needs another season so does Kane and Vietto

Lukaku has had two good seasons

Guys mentioned above have had half a season

As for Origi he is average and there is no way he is better than Lukaku

I watch a lot of Lille

Why do they need another season?

You can tell from when you first watch them that they're different gravy to Lukaku ability wise.

Kane already better than him both scoring and as a footballer.

I think Lukaku still has a small chance to be top class when he hits 26, 27 though.

When I said Neymar was easily more talented than a lot of players

Oh he plays in South America

But he done more in SA than Dybala,Kane,Vietto have done in 2014/15

Origi isn't good at all

Like I said I watch a lot of Lille

He isn't even a bright spark

It goes to show how good Eden was at Lille

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Dybala needs another season so does Kane and Vietto

Lukaku has had two good seasons

Guys mentioned above have had half a season

As for Origi he is average and there is no way he is better than Lukaku

I watch a lot of Lille

Why do they need another season?

You can tell from when you first watch them that they're different gravy to Lukaku ability wise.

Kane already better than him both scoring and as a footballer.

I think Lukaku still has a small chance to be top class when he hits 26, 27 though.

When I said Neymar was easily more talented than a lot of players

Oh he plays in South America

But he done more in SA than Dybala,Kane,Vietto have done in 2014/15

Origi isn't good at all

Like I said I watch a lot of Lille

He isn't even a bright spark

It goes to show how good Eden was at Lille

 

 

Your rating of Neymar is the one argument you've been 100% right with.

 

But at the same time, you thought Welbeck was had more talent than Sturridge so your opinion isn't infallible.

 

Origi is very good technically.

 

I'm not disagreeing he's been shit with Lille, who are shit themselves.

 

That doesn't concern me,

 

Surround him with Sterling Coutinho Sturridge Lallana and with Rodgers as manager lets see how he does.

 

He has a lot of ability/arrogance on the ball, reminds me of Sturridge, and he has the physique and pace to go with it, big talent but we'll see next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...