Jump to content

President Donald Trump Thread


Seydou

Recommended Posts

@Heero YuyPedos run rife through the ministers and upper class right through to lower class. Westminister trials where opened up to investigate hi profile people, but that got all swept under the rug.

Thats what they do, statue or no statue, they want to keep that shit hidden and active.

There are even groups advocating this to be legal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Heero Yuy said:

Are peado's going to be holding a protest about the removal of a statue? Their reason for holding a protest was completely legitimate, regardless of opinion about the statue. 

They weren't protesting for a statue, they were calling for white supremacy.

They've planned similar rallies coming up with no statue in sight.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's already been discussed these statues. If you agree they should remain given their significance and representation, along with the type of people waiting them up, and still expecting unison to be achieved on a racial and social level.

We have nothing in common.. fin

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Supermalt said:

They weren't protesting for a statue, they were calling for white supremacy.

They've planned similar rallies coming up with no statue in sight.

They got a permit issued to hold their protest because that's what they said they were protesting for. I also saw the flyer online (which was unite the right) and it was more nationalism and the statue, and nationalism isn't a crime. We all know how these rallies end up but the organiser will always get a bly just by saying "we can't help who turns up, they don;t represent us etc" .

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KKK denied permit to burn cross atop symbolic mountain in Georgia

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/16/kkk-permit-denied-cross-burning-stone-mountain-georgia

They don't give a fuck about a statue lol. It's about supremacist ideals plain and simple.

Should be in the same category as pedos who would protest to change the law/enforce ideals.

Let a counter protest happen to the above and any president saying "both sides"; "what about" would be finished.

/

Far right groups like national action are banned in the UK under the terrorism act, and so are Yank kkk leaders from entering here. 

Let ISIS ideals be marched over there to see how far this "freedom of speech" can go.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wether they casr

16 minutes ago, Supermalt said:

KKK denied permit to burn cross atop symbolic mountain in Georgia

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/16/kkk-permit-denied-cross-burning-stone-mountain-georgia

They don't give a fuck about a statue lol. It's about supremacist ideals plain and simple.

Should be in the same category as pedos who would protest to change the law/enforce ideals.

Let a counter protest happen to the above and any president saying "both sides"; "what about" would be finished.

/

Far right groups like national action are banned in the UK under the terrorism act, and so are Yank kkk leaders from entering here. 

Let ISIS ideals be marched over there to see how far this "freedom of speech" can go.

 

Bro you saying they don't give a fuck about the statue is just objective and irrelevant. That's what they said so that's their cover story and justification for the protest. 

/

Constitutional rights.

/

The issue here isn't the protest, it's the power Trumps silence gives the movement. Same way that the EDL have marched for a decade, called out by the government and the media and no one cares about them.  I wouldn't call for them to be banned because that adds more fuel to a barely lit fire.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Heero Yuy said:

Wether they casr

 

Bro you saying they don't give a fuck about the statue is just objective and irrelevant. That's what they said so that's their cover story and justification for the protest. 

/

Constitutional rights.

/

The issue here isn't the protest, it's the power Trumps silence gives the movement. Same way that the EDL have marched for a decade, called out by the government and the media and no one cares about them.  I wouldn't call for them to be banned because that adds more fuel to a barely lit fire.

Why not ban them? Someone died and a black church not so long ago was shot up by a white supremacist, the fire has been lit since America's inception.

White supremacy is terrorism.

Constitution has been interpreted and enforced by those powerful enough to reference it. Void for everyone else.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Kuffir said:

props for posting that been listening for the past 5 mins

Cool. Some peeps think white supremacy is just hooded kkk clansmen and hitler salutes, skinheads, shouting nigger and attending rallies. (at least with these guys, u can see your enemy, and rightly so need to get their jaws rocked)

It's the Matt's, Callums, Becky's, our empolyers, the insidious, subtle yet in your face at all angles yet silent, wherever you turn.

For the most part are decent people on surface, but rock the boat enough... "all lives matter, not just black", "uhh, beyonce is acting too black now", "black people had a black president, what are you complaining about now"

Will so normal white folks who claim they're against this be willing... on a systematic level to help others advance? Outside of being some liberal vs right, tree hugging lefty and anarchist group. Are they really down for the cause?? What are they doing to combat the institutionalised racism and systematic setbacks endured by black folks globally under a white supremacist world.

Hmm, just can't see it im afraid.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Supermalt said:

Why not ban them? Someone died and a black church not so long ago was shot up by a white supremacist, the fire has been lit since America's inception.

White supremacy is terrorism.

Constitution has been interpreted and enforced by those powerful enough to reference it. Void for everyone else.

 

Who bans them? The president who can't even out them, or every single states which is never going to happen.

and then if you start banning hate groups the otherside will say well why aren't you banning blm.

And when that doesn't happen a bigger movement from the one just banned will rise.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No but I think I've stated a few times on here that I'm not really backing the concept of total free speech when it can cause divisions and harm. Don't allow any of these hate groups to run around doing this shit, if you back one rule for all then I agree with you. Just not sure you share the same enthusiasm when it comes to other groups. Think some of you on here like to give the likes of ANTIFA a pass as if they are saviors set up to fight against racism when the reality is they are fascists who attack anyone who disagrees with them to push some rich Jewish dons agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Heero Yuy said:

 

Who bans them? The president who can't even out them, or every single states which is never going to happen.

and then if you start banning hate groups the otherside will say well why aren't you banning blm.

And when that doesn't happen a bigger movement from the one just banned will rise.

Yeah your right that trump will never go against his base and ban them, didn't say that they will.

Not addressing them before trump has resulted in this. ISIS rallies will never run at that scale in the states. They are a hate group and so are white supremacists.

And blm is a statement/deamon propaganda not an organization like the kkk who were 4 million strong membership in recent history. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gambino said:

No but I think I've stated a few times on here that I'm not really backing the concept of total free speech when it can cause divisions and harm.

Where

You've spoken highly of Nigel Farage wonder who else you rate

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see him as some kinda hate figure which divides people. I see him as a Politician who goes against the grain and speaks truths which are clear for everyone to see. You're never gonna get people to totally agree on everything regardless. Kinda like these scientists who recently have had to remind us we do actually have different genders on the planet, which in turn has people losing their minds with hate because in 2017 they believe we should be genderless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...