Jump to content

Skenghis Khan

Viper
  • Posts

    4373
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Skenghis Khan

  1. 140g protein in one sitting when here i am thinking the body can only process 30g every couple hrs

     

    BS

     

    140g protein in one sitting when here i am thinking the body can only process 30g every couple hrs

     differs for every person but the max is around 40

     

     anymore than 40g is a waste

     

    more BS

     

    http://www.wannabebig.com/diet-and-nutrition/is-there-a-limit-to-how-much-protein-the-body-can-use-in-a-single-meal/

     

    http://www.leangains.com/2010/10/top-ten-fasting-myths-debunked.html

     

    tl;dr the human body doesn't work like that and would be grossly inefficient if it did ,100g of protein just takes longer to digest than 40g.

     

    /op creatine is cheap as fuck, just pick up some creatine mono from one of the budget companies, whey is just convenient food why not get an unflavoured concentrate from one of the budget companies, or not, neither are essential. Also you seem to be talking about creatine like its a pre w/o supp, its not. have some caffeine if you need pep.  

  2.  

     

    he should buss case cos the word terrorism has been used in different ways/to sway opinion?

     

     

    mate u clearly didnt read all of the article 

     

    he should buss case because the soldier, it can be argued is a casualty of war and not a murder victim

     

     

    for all the arguing and posting and talking about analytical thinkin u claim to do u dnt show much evidence of that.

     

     

    same for alot of u guys

     

    technically then it would be treason as the assailants were British citizens -"levying war against the crown, being adherent to enemies of the crown"

     

    and yes the term terrorism should probably be reserved for when non-combatants/civilians are specifically targeted.

     

    I agree some perspective is required, over 1.5 million people no longer exist due to the recent conflicts in the middle east, the majority of these deaths were non-combatants who had the misfortune of living in Pipelineistan. Not to mention the trillions stolen from the tax payer to fund this misadventure, none of us are benefiting from this, war is the most wasteful, immoral activity we can participate in.

     

    the British state is immoral, violent political Islam is immoral. If you condone wars of aggression or butchering people in the street you're immoral.

    No terrorism is violence of a political nature perpetrated by non-state actors. 

     

    That is a widely accepted definition, we need an objective definition but I find that one problematic personally. What are your thoughts on the terms "state terrorism" and "war on terror"?  

     

    Only states have a monopoly of the use of force. 

     

    Which is why statism is immoral and irrational.

     

    It's unlikely that the US would have ever opened Guantanamo Bay for soldiers fighting under the auspices of state. For example they had to treat Iraqi POWS  well under the Geneva Convention. d*ck Cheney et. al. argued  (wrongly in my opinion) that as islamists were not fighting for a state, they should be termed enemy combatants and not be afforded the protections given under the Geneva convention.

     

    what about mercenaries?

     

    not sure if international law is worth the paper its written on, the US is allowed to conduct wars of aggression and get away with it.

    • Upvote 2
  3. he should buss case cos the word terrorism has been used in different ways/to sway opinion?

     

     

    mate u clearly didnt read all of the article 

     

    he should buss case because the soldier, it can be argued is a casualty of war and not a murder victim

     

     

    for all the arguing and posting and talking about analytical thinkin u claim to do u dnt show much evidence of that.

     

     

    same for alot of u guys

     

    technically then it would be treason as the assailants were British citizens -"levying war against the crown, being adherent to enemies of the crown"

     

    and yes the term terrorism should probably be reserved for when non-combatants/civilians are specifically targeted.

     

    I agree some perspective is required, over 1.5 million people no longer exist due to the recent conflicts in the middle east, the majority of these deaths were non-combatants who had the misfortune of living in Pipelineistan. Not to mention the trillions stolen from the tax payer to fund this misadventure, none of us are benefiting from this, war is the most wasteful, immoral activity we can participate in.

     

    the British state is immoral, violent political Islam is immoral. If you condone wars of aggression or butchering people in the street you're immoral.

    • Upvote 1
  4. workout A:

    squat 3x5

    bench 3x5

    deadlift 1x5

    workout B:

    squat 3x5

    ohp 3x5

    power clean 5x3

    its worth finding the SS pdf and spreadsheets online.

    novices will stall faster on 5x5 than 3x5 FACT. starting strength is superior.

    5/3/1 is an excellent program, i run a tweaked version of it all the time, but its for intermediates.

  5. I just don't f*ck with animals in general really. They're annoying. I think I did have an incident as a yout that has left some mental scaring.

    But that big hound is just ridiculous. I'm sitting tryna watch football and that big motherf*cker is wandering round the gaff like he owns this sh*t. Nah

    yh but

    realistically tho a 20 stone dog is a liability in a number of ways. if i lived in a castle i might consider it.

  6. The f*ck would you want that nastiness sharing your yard with you

    Unfathomable

    well u aint gonna get burgled are you?

    the breed goes back like a 1000 years, used to be a war dog.

    i dont condone this btw, i dont really like dogs but i thought i would provide a counteraction to kg's evolutionary cul-de-sac gremlin thing.

    /

    lol nah dave, i was terrified of it.

    • Upvote 1
  7. my uncle used to have english mastiff that weighed over 250lbs, geez used to bowl about like a stark. he got it from some greek fella, its dad was meant to be the biggest mastiff ever.

    it used to eat a whole chicken in about 10 seconds flat, it had the biggest room in the house, imagine keeping a bear in ur drum and you have some idea of what it was like

  8. When I jump back on my lean bulk:

    Chest + Light tri

    Back + Traps + Light Bis

    OFF

    Legs + Shoulders + Traps

    Chest (Mainly upper chest focus) + Full out arm day

    OFF - I'f I;m not working a Saturday shift I'll throw in another Leg session/Squats

    OFF

    Upper Chest and Traps are the main focus for my next bulking phase since those are my weak spots. Jeff Seid designed it for me, messaged him on Bodybuilding months ago before he became popular.

    [media]

    [/media]

    hes jooocy

    no homes

    rep ranges

    rest times

    exercises

    ?

    ur gay as f*ck.

    learn to squat first carpet pilot

  9. funny thread

    done both, both work if done correctly. the sitters will lean forward which makes it pretty much the same as standing anyway, i did this once and the toilet seat became detached so i usually stand these days.

    /

    another divisive personal hygiene issue is flossing, like do you floss with the towel after showering?

  10. lol the guys been losing it for time now

    couldnt get a grab of kimmy k n it sent him over board

    i think he hated this place n the grip it had over him

    like an addiction in a way

    i'm the same i jus aint ready to give up

    when i am i'm gonna tell ice to suck his orange mum

    tbh i hate this forum and most of the idiotic ppl that post on it, got pulled back in by the gayle/gaddaz scandal but think i will sign out permanently quite soon before guys start talking about wearing makeup in l&l.

    quite surprised m12 did that tho, didnt have him down as a degenerate. Why didnt he just logout and not come back?

  11. freemasonry is a taboo topic for the most part, people glaze over like you just called the queen a reptile if you mention it, which is a shame because its actually quite important. Certain parts of this country and many aspects of our system are rife with masonry,

    I believe that freemasons should be banned from public service quite simply because some of the oaths and vows they take as masons directly contravene the oaths they make as public servants, this is to me quite traitorous.

    It is quite obviously problematic to have a police force and judicial system infested with masonry when they take oaths which amount to a pledge to protect their fellow masons from prosecution.

    and frankly i dont want the country to be run be a bunch of dodgy cunts who dress up in kinky robes and surround themselves with occultist mumbo jumbo on the weekend, the revelation that such types are partial to a spot of noncery should come as no surprise.

    • Upvote 5
  12. Lol

    7 years deep think the mrs still does the tissue trick to silence di plops, i wasnt entirely sure she wasnt some input only biological anomaly for a while.

    see her piss all the time, although she usually avoids eye contact. first time i saw this it did feel like a special occasion if im honest.

  13. u done a cycle mate?

    i'm gunna throw some anavar in with the dbols to keep down the water weight fella

    u think its a good idea?

    also when i start to get roid rage i bang a lil 0.1 mdizzle to calm me down and give me a happy but euphoric buzz, stops me from wanting to clump geazers in the weights room

    nope. I know folks who cycle regularly tho. dbol and test is the oldskool favourite, f*ck fagvar embrace the bloat. dbol doesnt give anyone i know rage at all, tren turns ppl proper cunty tho,and gives you that roul moat face.

    obv i think its all a bad idea.

    inb4justinsaysroidsrshit

  14. im pretty disgusted tbh, that man had the bravery to come on national tv and recount the heinous violations he was subjected to as a child and the subsequent cover ups and all it takes to silence journalism in this country is for the vile perpetrators to threaten to issue writs. That is exactly how savile got away with it for so long.

    a few political blogs are naming and shaming despite the litigation that may well occur.

    interesting blog entry from tom watson, the mp who raised the possibility of a peado ring linked to number 10 in PMQs:

    http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2012/11/10-days-that-shook-my-world

    although im baffled as to why he wont use his parliamentary privilege to name the pedophiles

    can someone with a twitter suggest he do so?

    https://twitter.com/tom_watson

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...