SoCo KinG Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 off topic..i remember reading that story in the paper couple months ago where they called it a burglary gone wrong..and they sliced up that old person into pieces on some surgeon tip..got me vex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Skeng Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 dey must had some sick lawyers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCo KinG Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 dey must had some sick lawyers Truss..the way some lawyers go on make it seem like they were the victims, it's mad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 its a f*ck*ng disgrace that they havent gotten more years in jail at least. dont even care if they are troubled and badly brought up kids, its just common sense to know that actions hold consequences. preying on the old an the defenseless is just pathetic. feel sorry for the family really, after a long and probably eventful life what a way to f*ckin die. for kids amusement. its a real shame. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WAVESURFER Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 I'm all for criminal rehabilitation and sensible sentencing, but when I hear about stories like this, I imagine if it happened to my gran/grandad or another older relative, and it makes my blood f*ck*ng boil. Anyone who victimises an old person (or a child, for that matter - both vulnerable targets) like this is f*ck*ng scum, and they should be put away for a long, long time. f*ck*ng cowards. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streets. Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 How can you randomly hit someone in the face when they're with a child, cause their death, and get anything less than 10 years minimum. f*ck*ng terrible Don't know much about the background on this case, but if there's evidence to suggest they just meant to shock/embarrass the man - the jail terms could be fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank. Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Obviously didnt intend to kill the guy. they were not to know this guy was so feeble/ill whatever. Fair imo. 2 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCo KinG Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Obviously didnt intend to kill the guy. they were not to know this guy was so feeble/ill whatever. Fair imo. 'the f*ck you mean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank. Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Obviously didnt intend to kill the guy. they were not to know this guy was so feeble/ill whatever. Fair imo. 'the f*ck you mean exactly what i said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuri Posted July 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Obviously didnt intend to kill the guy. they were not to know this guy was so feeble/ill whatever. Fair imo. you f*ck*ng serious? you were the last person i expect to make some liberal bullshit post like that they clubbed a 70 year old man in the back of the head with no warning or provocation, in front of his 3 year old granddaughter, just for a laugh. then when they saw him having a seizure on the floor they ran off laughing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 dont be stupid he was an old man for f*cks sake, its more than likely that he is weaker than the average person. swear i heard on the news aswell that the 2nd guy with the cast had an IQ of only 60. thats close enough to being an animal. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCo KinG Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Obviously didnt intend to kill the guy. they were not to know this guy was so feeble/ill whatever. Fair imo. 'the f*ck you mean exactly what i said. I'm seeing words but not understanding them... Guy ran off laughin like it wern't a ting..3 years is just telling him he can kill someone, say it's an accident and go down for hardly any time.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corrigan Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 i agree with frank in the sense that these yutes obviously didnt intend to kill this man and i'm sure they felt like absolute sh*t after and i doubt they will ever do this again. Remember for the rest of their lives they will have this guys life on their conscience and it WILL haunt them, cos this guy was completely innocent but 3 1/2 years is f*cked they shud have got 10 years imo, and eligible for parole after 5 / they slapped man or hit lol @ getting sucked in by media hyperbole with words like "CLUBBED" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCo KinG Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 i agree with frank in the sense that these yutes obviously didnt intend to kill this man and i'm sure they felt like absolute sh*t after and i doubt they will ever do this again. Remember for the rest of their lives they will have this guys life on their conscience and it WILL haunt them, cos this guy was completely innocent but 3 1/2 years is f*cked they shud have got 10 years imo, and eligible for parole after 5 / they slapped man or at worst hit lol @ getting sucked in by media hyperbole with words like "CLUBBED" from when an old man is walkin down the road with his 3 year old grand daughter and you try to boy him off, you must not have a conscience 10 years sounds right..8 atleast 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuri Posted July 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 i agree with frank in the sense that these yutes obviously didnt intend to kill this man and i'm sure they felt like absolute sh*t after and i doubt they will ever do this again. Remember for the rest of their lives they will have this guys life on their conscience and it WILL haunt them, cos this guy was completely innocent but 3 1/2 years is f*cked they shud have got 10 years imo, and eligible for parole after 5 / they slapped man or at worst hit lol @ getting sucked in by media hyperbole with words like "CLUBBED" why are you defending these scumbags? yeah, obviously the media is spinning this out of proportion. i mean, it's kind of acceptable to SLAP a 70 year old man for a laugh right? - anybody who even does that should be given 5 years minimum imo, let alone if the guy dies if they felt like sh*t, why did they run off laughing and joke about it later? if they did this in lots of other countries people in their local community and/or the police would have bodied them. but on vip2 they;re just misunderstood 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corrigan Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 bruv these man didnt go out with the inention of killing him they were just very stupid kids do you think they were laughing once they knew he was dead? as i said 3 1/2 is too short but guys saying life are bait sun/daily mail readers i'm not defending these guys, i'm just looking at this objectively Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuri Posted July 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 bruv these man didnt go out with the inention of killing him they were just very stupid kids do you think they were laughing once they knew he was dead? as i said 3 1/2 is too short but guys saying life are bait sun/daily mail readers why are you so sure they were traumatised when they found out he was dead? their actions don't suggest anything like that...2 people with a history of attacking old people for a laugh. this wasn't some random incident where they got drunk and lost control (not that yuo could justify that either), but they had a catalogue of similar incidents where they showed no concern for the consequences. dunno about you, but when i was 15 i knew right from wrong and i also knew hitting an old man in the back of the head by surprise might have bad consequences for his health 3 1/2 is waht they should have got if he hadn't died imo nah not a sun/daily mail reader, just once again baffled by how soft/liberal people are in this country 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank. Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Obviously didnt intend to kill the guy. they were not to know this guy was so feeble/ill whatever. Fair imo. you f*ck*ng serious? you were the last person i expect to make some liberal bullshit post like that they clubbed a 70 year old man in the back of the head with no warning or provocation, in front of his 3 year old granddaughter, just for a laugh. then when they saw him having a seizure on the floor they ran off laughing. Im sure everyone was young and stupid at some point and made mistakes, the fact they was going try charge these kids with murder first of all is madness, they f*cked up got a fairly leniant sentence and im sure will learn from it. As i said its just my opinon. and c/s the media exageration. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corrigan Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 im sure cos these guys are stupid kids not hardened criminals that wud shrug off murder like its nuffin lol @ ever thinking these doughnuts shud b charged with murder they probably didnt even know he was having a seizure when ure adreneline is pumping you would be suprised how oblivious you are to things going on around you 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeMason Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 They should be put on Stealth with no seatbelt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corrigan Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 pos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCo KinG Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 TBH if he wouldn't of died it wouldnt of been anythin even worth talking about..so it's just unlucky all round..but from when they're the reason the guys dead, THAT'S my reasoning for why they should get longer.. this is what i'm talking about when i said people having different views..makes it more interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corrigan Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 basically the sentances were too short shud have been between 5-10 guys saying life are idiots with no clue as to how the legal system works Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCo KinG Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Life would just mean ruining 3 lives...the boys are young enough to grow out of the way they're acting now and learn there's more to life than prison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corrigan Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Life would just mean ruining 3 lives...the boys are young enough to grow out of the way they're acting now and learn there's more to life than prison EXACTLY HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.