Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
JJ

FAO Apache

Recommended Posts

"Bellamy >>>>>> Harewood.Parker >>>>>>> Reo.Neill/Upson >>>> Knight."First off, NRC is better than Parker IMO - he's shown for us that he's added to his game what he lacked for you, breaking forward and playing balls through and having shots. All I ever heard was west ham fans say he would never play a decent ball through and his shots were sh*t. Well hes done that in pretty much every game he's played.Anyway, back to my point.Yes, of course your first choice defence and starting striker is better than our now 5th choice CB (after we sign Davies today) and our fourth choice striker (Maybe 5th if we get Defoe).Whats your point exactly? That your starting players are better than players that will struggle to get on our bench?We finished higher than you last season - and we have improved.You finished below us last season - lost your captain and two best players and replaced them with a few overpriced signings who haven't been ontop of their game over the past year or so..Just letting you know the score...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Bellamy >>>>>> Harewood.Parker >>>>>>> Reo.Neill/Upson >>>> Knight."First off, NRC is better than Parker IMO - he's shown for us that he's added to his game what he lacked for you, breaking forward and playing balls through and having shots. All I ever heard was west ham fans say he would never play a decent ball through and his shots were sh*t. Well hes done that in pretty much every game he's played.Anyway, back to my point.Yes, of course your first choice defence and starting striker is better than our now 5th choice CB (after we sign Davies today) and our fourth choice striker (Maybe 5th if we get Defoe).Whats your point exactly? That your starting players are better than players that will struggle to get on our bench?We finished higher than you last season - and we have improved.You finished below us last season - lost your captain and two best players and replaced them with a few overpriced signings who haven't been ontop of their game over the past year or so..Just letting you know the score...
Reo Coker is poor as he is about as technical as a paper clip.My whole point was based upon the assumption that Villa would actually spend some money and not on rejects.I'd also say signing Bellamy, Neill, Parker, Upson and Ljungberg is better than signing Reo Coker, Harewood and Knight. You'll probably finish above us, but only because you play not lose as opposed to win. You are draw specialists and play dire football.Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Its Me Bitches
parker is ALOT better than nrci stoped reading after that
well then you slipped coz he made a lot of valid points....villa are a big team but o'neil should be buying players to improve the starting 11 not the reserves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
parker is ALOT better than nrci stoped reading after that
well then you slipped coz he made a lot of valid points....villa are a big team but o'neil should be buying players to improve the starting 11 not the reserves
Exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Bellamy >>>>>> Harewood.Parker >>>>>>> Reo.Neill/Upson >>>> Knight."First off, NRC is better than Parker IMO - he's shown for us that he's added to his game what he lacked for you, breaking forward and playing balls through and having shots. All I ever heard was west ham fans say he would never play a decent ball through and his shots were sh*t. Well hes done that in pretty much every game he's played.Anyway, back to my point.Yes, of course your first choice defence and starting striker is better than our now 5th choice CB (after we sign Davies today) and our fourth choice striker (Maybe 5th if we get Defoe).Whats your point exactly? That your starting players are better than players that will struggle to get on our bench?We finished higher than you last season - and we have improved.You finished below us last season - lost your captain and two best players and replaced them with a few overpriced signings who haven't been ontop of their game over the past year or so..Just letting you know the score...
Reo Coker is poor as he is about as technical as a paper clip.My whole point was based upon the assumption that Villa would actually spend some money and not on rejects.I'd also say signing Bellamy, Neill, Parker, Upson and Ljungberg is better than signing Reo Coker, Harewood and Knight. You'll probably finish above us, but only because you play not lose as opposed to win. You are draw specialists and play dire football.Thank you.
TBH you musn't of watched us since January then.When O'Neill got Maloney, Young an Carew in in Jan, since then we've played some great stuff.Last summer he only had chance to get in Petrov ( biggrin.gif ) and tried to get Milner but he got pulled back.O'Neill has said he wants to shake off his tag of being effective and wants to play some good stuff, whcih is what we do now.We often start with Barry, Petrov, Young, Agbonlahor and Carew in the same side, and after Petrovs latest sh*t displays I expect us back to a 4-4-2 with Young and Maloney on the wings and Carew and Gabby/Moore uptop.If thats not an attacking formation IDK what is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
parker is ALOT better than nrci stoped reading after that
well then you slipped coz he made a lot of valid points....villa are a big team but o'neil should be buying players to improve the starting 11 not the reserves
Personally, with the exception of RB I think our first 11 is good enough for top 7 - I think we need a regular goal scorer and hopefully Gabby/Moore can step upMaybe I'm bias, but..Carson?, Mellberg, Laursen, BoumaPetrov/Maloney, Barry, NRC, YoungCarew, AgbonlahorIs a good solid side IMO.Anyway I'm off out now for a bit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
parker is ALOT better than nrci stoped reading after that
Not even. They're on the same level. Both of them lack technique.Parker's a bit more disciplined and a better holder, but Reo Coker's a better athlete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All well and good O'Neil saying he wants you to play good football but the proof is in the Pudding...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Its Me Bitches

i liked villa beginign of last season withMOORE---------------ANGEL---------------AGBONLAHORimo that was BIGhavnt replaced angle, Carew isnt cutting it...Young and Agbonlahor put in a lot of good balls for him aswell, half the time he doesnt get up quick enough or even bother moving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Its Me Bitches
parker is ALOT better than nrci stoped reading after that
Not even. They're on the same level. Both of them lack technique.Parker's a bit more disciplined and a better holder, but Reo Coker's a better athlete
lol thats why parker is now sh*t imo parker has good technique he was sick at charlton where he played a lot more advanced.... newcastle and england killed him playing him DM... and restricting him...who remembers parker doing those kickup tricks and sh*t for Mcds ad like 10-12 years ago he was like 14 everyone wanted to sign him...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't really matter when half the West Ham side are crippled with long term injuries. Villa are the embodiment of mediocre. But that's still above what West Ham are currently going to achieve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×