Controversial opinions that you have

[Guest WAVESURFER]

its not up to a parole board to judge the length of sentance...the sentance was 7 years so thats what her crime deserves according to british justice....because this country is so fair if she does nothing wrong in these 7 years she cant be denied parole tbh

It's not about "if she does nothing wrong when she's in jail". It's "if she's still a danger to the public". Can you imagine the outcry if she got out on parole at the first opportunity? We're not talking about some minor road guy who got caught with drugs or something, this is a VERY high-profile case of a female serial paedophile. She's not getting out in 7 years mate, end of discussion.

[DAT_YOUT_FROM_E15]

these paedos always buss case tho

[VENOM]

British Judges are undercover peadopphiles. this isnt even controversial its just hush hush news thats been known from day.a woman sexually abuses BABIES and takes pics while doing itand gets just SEVEN years

This is how I know you can't read.She's been jailed indefinitely. Do you even know what "indefinitely" means?Her minimum sentence is 7 years, but there's no way she's getting out in 7.

she was jailed for 7 years, and told that she would not be released IF she still poses a threat to the publicTHAT MEANS HER INDEFINATE SENTENCE HAS CONDITIONS ATTACHEDI DONT CARE IF SHE WONT BE RELEASED THE FACT IS THAT THE CONDITIONS WERE LAID OUT ANYWAYWHY NOT JUST JAIL HER FOR 25 YEARS? WHY SAY JAILED FOR 7 IF YOU'RE A GOOD GIRL.ABOUT U KNOW I CANNOT READ.

[Mr.Skeng]

i think more than anything there resides jealousy and an insecurity in people who cannot fully engage with someone younger than them, and you have to resort to the other persons age to validate your own argument.prophet you can see esquilax is not an imbecile and actually puts more thought into his posts than most others, probably more than the healthy amount stated, and for you to disregard that actually highlights your shortcomings.

For the last time, I can and will if its something I feel he can engage a proper debate in.In case you missed it, this whole debate started from him throwing words, not an actual debate

The way numero chats the most sh*t, and then talks about how basically everyone is 'ignorant' gets me kind of mad.Get real bro

If you dont wanna believe that, cool.And Esquilax, cool off mate. I'm not inna your little e-hype. You arent much more than a spambot. Tellin me about chatting sh*t when you read Wikipedia and come with half truths. Come back when youre out of your teens little boy

Lol what is everyones problem with Wikipedia? Numerous studies have shown that it's just as reliable as Britannica Your pseudo intellectualism and just general faggotry has become more and more prominent these past few weeksYou're not "Inna my e-hype"?Could you actually be any more of a c*nt?My answer: Probably not

There isnt a problem with Wikipedia most of the time. Sometimes they chat sh*t on there which needs to be verified. Some people dont do further research to see whether its correct then bring it into serious debates. You fall into that "some people" category.Besides, I dont talk to adolescents in real life unless I'm asking them "hows everything going in school?" True I cant see your face, I forget you were born in the 90s. You was 3/4 years old when 2Pac was killed. Llow talking to me like you are of age.

Put it into perspective, and stop with your "validate argument" nonsense. There wasnt an argument to validate. As I've said before if its something I feel he can speak on no problem, but his age restricts him certain time. Me judging him by his age stems from a previous debate where he brought incorrect information from Wikipedia into a debate. I put it down him not being old enough to know what really happened. In case you never noticed that is a time when I debated with him. Youre fooled by his vocab, which I commend him on. Doesnt mean his points hold weight. Thun plays with words well, but hes in the same boat (llow responding to that Thun)So to round up this discussion, there wasnt actually a debate, I was putting the boy in his place. Anyone else who wants to perform some psycho-analysis like say theyre are some resident shrink about what I meant (when it was a reaction to him trying to cuss), refer to this post and sekkle.Safe

you need to allow it, you've already disgraced yourself in this thread.

[Guest WAVESURFER]

its not up to a parole board to judge the length of sentance...the sentance was 7 years so thats what her crime deserves according to british justice....because this country is so fair if she does nothing wrong in these 7 years she cant be denied parole tbh

It's not about "if she does nothing wrong when she's in jail". It's "if she's still a danger to the public". Can you imagine the outcry if she got out on parole at the first opportunity? We're not talking about some minor road guy who got caught with drugs or something, this is a VERY high-profile case of a female paedophile. She's not getting out in 7 years mate, end of discussion.

about end of discussion like youre someone more important than me lol.....listen i know its joke to you that she can get out then but she can and will....btw public aint gonna know or care about this in 2 years nevermind 7....btw next time you google indefinate sentance for the protection of the public make sure you realise a drug dealer cant get this sentance.....lol at thinking you know more about this than me then trying to stamp out the discussion when someone has a different view to you

Don't be stupid.People dont forget about cases like this. This is on the levels of Ian Huntley and other notorious cases like that.A female nursery nurse raping umpteen kids in her care, and refusing to name her victims? With the amount of media coverage this has had? And you think it's just gonna be forgotten?And the drug dealer thing was an arbitrary example. I could have said anything there, the point still stands that this is a high-profile case involving a crime that there's already a moral panic over. Some guy from your area or whoever it is you know that served one of these IPP sentences is not.

[VENOM]

thats the thing with equifag and 001 brain cell. they keep nitpicking retweeting each other like little women

[VENOM]

its not up to a parole board to judge the length of sentance...the sentance was 7 years so thats what her crime deserves according to british justice....because this country is so fair if she does nothing wrong in these 7 years she cant be denied parole tbh

It's not about "if she does nothing wrong when she's in jail". It's "if she's still a danger to the public". Can you imagine the outcry if she got out on parole at the first opportunity? We're not talking about some minor road guy who got caught with drugs or something, this is a VERY high-profile case of a female paedophile. She's not getting out in 7 years mate, end of discussion.

about end of discussion like youre someone more important than me lol.....listen i know its joke to you that she can get out then but she can and will....btw public aint gonna know or care about this in 2 years nevermind 7....btw next time you google indefinate sentance for the protection of the public make sure you realise a drug dealer cant get this sentance.....lol at thinking you know more about this than me then trying to stamp out the discussion when someone has a different view to you

Don't be stupid.People dont forget about cases like this. This is on the levels of Ian Huntley and other notorious cases like that.A female nursery nurse raping umpteen kids in her care, and refusing to name her victims? With the amount of media coverage this has had? And you think it's just gonna be forgotten?And the drug dealer thing was an arbitrary example. I could have said anything there, the point still stands that this is a high-profile case involving a crime that there's already a moral panic over. Some guy from your area or whoever it is you know that served one of these IPP sentences is not.

by then thee would be much worse cases the public would be concerned about. besides with all the so called public outcry the peado judge didnt care no way to only dish out 7 years with 'strings attached'. the public want her to rot there in an outright life sentence, so when has the public ever decided anything?

[Alejandro Sosa]

lmao at eating pig ever

i negged this by mistake sorry bromeant to pos u

[Grafter]

at the same time i dont see why people who are excessively violent should get less than a child molesterif anything someone who its extremely thuggish and violent poses more of a threat to society than a creep who downloads child porn on the internet TBH

paedophilia is the most abhorrent crime of all an should get the maximum sentence

[Numero001]

There isnt any point in posting towards me. If you dont understand what I'm saying then I'm convinced your fully dunce or biased. Nothing will change lolFrom people were telling charliechalk "Llow him hes young" when discussing Equilax's relationship issues in the venting thread yet wanna come in here and go on like age has nothing to do with it, your dunce. Make of that what you wantEnd of discussion

[Grafter]

Psalms 8:2: Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength because of thine enemies, that thou mightest still the enemy and the avenger.Matthew 21:16: And said unto him, Hearest thou what these say? And Jesus saith unto them, Yea; have ye never read, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise?

[Guest WAVESURFER]

f*ck*ng hell, here we go with the bible quotes.

[Grafter]

take a moment to understand what it says, understand the meaning and how it applies to whats gone on in this threadbefore u start slatin it because its from the bible

[Guest Triple XXX]

take a moment to understand what it says, understand the meaning and how it applies to whats gone on in this threadbefore u start slatin it because its from the bible

i dont even get it

[Grafter]

take a moment to understand what it says, understand the meaning and how it applies to whats gone on in this threadbefore u start slatin it because its from the bible

i dont even get it

the 'babes and sucklings' represent esquillax in this contextit makes the point that the children are valuable to us today, and what they say is or can be importantthe first quote in its simplicity tells us that from the young we can gain strength to fight our enemiesin my view this can be applied in several other contexts not typically in literal battle

[Guest Triple XXX]

o right

[Guest Esquilax]

at the same time i dont see why people who are excessively violent should get less than a child molesterif anything someone who its extremely thuggish and violent poses more of a threat to society than a creep who downloads child porn on the internet TBH

paedophilia is the most abhorrent crime of all an should get the maximum sentence

Not saying it shouldn't, just that people who are excessively violent should get lesser sentences just cuz they ain't fiddled kidsHumans are vulnerable creatures, the vast majority aren't down for self defense, nor would know how to properly approach a situation in which a great deal of animosity and aggressiveness is thrown at them.The law is there to protect law abiding citizens, and I see that as the best form of protection.

[Escapist]

at the same time i dont see why people who are excessively violent should get less than a child molesterif anything someone who its extremely thuggish and violent poses more of a threat to society than a creep who downloads child porn on the internet TBH

paedophilia is the most abhorrent crime of all an should get the maximum sentence

The law is there to protect law abiding citizens, and I see that as the best form of protection.

agreed.

[Natalie]

'This is it' is a sh*t song