Grumpy Old Man

This'll inevitably feed a mass endorcement of "stop snitching", in many campaign waves. Splendid!

Are there kodaks available of this dame's frame? This isn't the first time I've seen such a comment.nope but she is being truthfull...the frame stops traffic lol Kuri give him a dose !

I'm glad. I like those.On topic though, LOL @ long periods without washing clothing. Sounds gross.

Are there kodaks available of this dame's frame? This isn't the first time I've seen such a comment.

How did that just get ruined?

http://www.waterstones.com/waterstonesweb/...thello/4228121/SHET!!! Everything is everything.

I see you all. I always thought about the possibility of this, and what the situation would be if one felt like the other's demands were unreasonable. Personally, if I ever get a girl again, we need to have the same eyes - I mean, see sh*t the same. But what if there was a difference in opinion there? Do you do the unreasonable to accomodate them or keep doing what you do, and would either result in the inevitable end to the relationship?

Subject to translation and always requiring opinion, infidelity has grown to be an engaging issue. Does it require penetrative sex (at one extreme), or is it done once a person puts themselves in the position where any situation could arise, with the intent of that happening? Some even say all it requires is the thought of it. Does it depend on the nature of the agreement between the parties involved, and does it accomodate what the other person perceives as what cheating actually is? Once an aspect of what might be perceived as infidelity occurs, does that license someone to "go all the way" if by their understanding, they hadn't? Would the degree of infidelity, if by any opinions formed that they had one, even matter once any break of preconceived acceptability had occured? (For example, if he sends her a text message about any "heavenly voluptousness" that his dame would not appreciate, to what extent would it then matter if he proceeded to eplore said her?) What is acceptable to you? What would you be willing to ignore, raise issues about, tollerate in part, perhaps even fight for? What would make you get like the bride and Kill Bill? What do you MFs think?

Whoopi, holla!

My sisters are 24 and 23... still get George Foremaned from time to time. Nothing big though. Especially not with an attitude. Noone gets anywhere with brash behaviour. Luckily, they always sought to avoid being like the dames I lay with.I like that KayGee has that dog.

Together, they collected 69 votes on an internet forum. They win.

Stop being a p*ssy.

I guess not everybody is a freak... I wonder if our parents did it in the 70s, there were a lot of freaks back then.

I'd rather a woman was done exorcising her demons, then we'll examine (and investigate) what she presents, see if we can strike a deal. I'd like to hear one or two previous, three might run. If she's done exorcising her demons, and is prepared to accept everything that comes with what bein serious entails, we can get it cracking like chapped lips - subject to agreement of personal terms. However, a virgin has yet to go through her wild stage. The inexperience coupled with the inevitable curiosity about sexual adventure once you # POP CHAMPAGNE #, trying to supress any thoughts afterwards never really gets rid of it. When she knows what she wants, which is quite far-fetched since women aren't famed for it, or when she's on-point with respect and love of who she is, we can then examine her CV. Sex is important to me in a relationship. And even though she can keep finding herself with me, I don't think it's neither realistic nor attractive that I am the whole thing. It's like I read in another thread, the sh*t ain't Disney. It's as immature and naive to expect this, knowing what human nature is what it is.I wouldn't sign an inexperienced left back like Kieran Gibbs to be first team in a big money deal. I also wouldn't sign Ashley Cole, knowing the nature of his experience with his previous employers, no matter what his attributes are. Clichy would get copped for £15M. Yah'mean?

Couldn't settle down with a virgin. To be honest, I find it would be utter stupidity. There's a cult following going on here...

Why didn't anyone from her work comment with "LOOOOOOOOOOOOL"? They're boring!

Is she fat?

Yah'mean. It was taken to heart!Disclaimer: I don't have to agree with a lifestyle to find it entertaining.

Good woman or (preferable) relationship material? Because there's a big difference between the two for me personally, and most entries seem to be synonymous with the latter. I might be wrong...

I read every single post in the thread. I genuinely don't believe it. Weird wind-up though. Big following.

Dump her. Being with a plain-Jane just because she's a textbook girlfriend-type is off point for so many reasons. For once, it might be a supterfuge. Also, if there's no heat, you're wasting your time. Why are you still dating her anyway? You sound like you've made your mind up.

cos if shes crazy she can all come an smash ur windows, smash up ur car, tell certain guys where u live, set u up, rob u, stalk u hdnt act like u can always tell if a girl is capable of them things before u sleep with her either, u cantAt 25, I don't screw adolescents anymore. If a grown woman's on that nonesense, I'm sure I'm more susceptible to it in an unfamiliar area - it's much easier to set someone up outside their geographical sphere of influence. If however I do get stalked or something of the sort, I have big hairy balls. You're right though, you can't tell a loony from genesis. I guess my horseshoe vibe is strong. But the fact still remains that in his niche, a man is king - his rules, period. Do what you want to do, and when she has to go, she has to go. Unless of course he's not that sort of animal. If required, contingency plans can be put in place.

Yah'mean.