Jump to content

Let's talk books


Shy One

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Bex, i thought ON BEAUTY - ZADIE SMITHWAS SO...DISSAPOINTING.
argh, I bought it the other day. and it's taking me too long to get into-if i'm not gripped from the beginning then I can't go on
i know what you mean, it does take a while to get going, plus the beginning is kinda confusing. but persevere with it if you can! everything ties together at the end.loafs i really liked it! what did you find disapointing? i admit it is kinda difficult to get into, it was my holiday book last year so i had no choice but to read the whole thing lol. i thought it finished well though, i liked how it wasn't a stereotypical "happy ending" (don't wanna say too much if people are reading it)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to try and stick to my new years resolution of reading at least one book a month.
Llow forcing yourself to read.
I'm not forcing myself to read. This is something I wanted to do. I wanted to just read more then I usually do. I called it a new years resolution because I started it at the beginning of the year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to try and stick to my new years resolution of reading at least one book a month.
Llow forcing yourself to read.
I'm not forcing myself to read. This is something I wanted to do. I wanted to just read more then I usually do. I called it a new years resolution because I started it at the beginning of the year.
Alright cool bruv, it weren't a hating ting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

re-reading LOTR atm..
Frodo dies at the endPISSED
re-reading LOTR atm..
Once again, you fail.
Why the f*ck are you reading them again? You failed to understand it the first time round so you're doing a "RE-TAKE" biggrin.gif
Laughing at your own joke doesnt get anyoen to laugh alone with you, it just makes you look much more sad.I'm reading them again because they are entertaining.Speaking of failing to understand things, you clearly do not understand the food chain, Me>>>You.You also fail to understand things if you missed the first time that I said Rereading, not just reading. Imbecile.Don't think you have the wit to address one such as myself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bought Michel Houellebecq - Atomised today.ReviewMichel Houellebecq's dark and disturbing novel Atomised sees him establish himself as a unique and important voice in European letters. With his first work, Whatever, Houellebecq had created a sassy, street-wise bulletin of disaffected existentialism, and here that voice brilliantly extends its range. Atomised (from the French Les Particules élémentaires) is the story of two half-brothers, Michel and Bruno, who seem to represent two sides of Houellebecq himself (there are more than a few moments in the book where we feel we are reading a strange roman à clef). Michel, a molecular biologist, finds ordinary, human emotions inexplicable, making him seem abstruse and cold. Bruno is his opposite: a frustrated libertine trapped in a body most find repellant but still holding sex up as his most validating moment. Through these skewed archetypes an intricate, sometimes quite moving story of the brothers' lives is formed.Houellebecq obviously has a formidable intellect and, like the best French writers, manages to rail against anthropology, psychoanalysis, New Age philosophy and modern society in general without losing sight of his narrative--indeed the narrative is controlled quite beautifully, the pacing excellent, the switching from one brother's story to the other's done with a quiet grace. While some of Houellebecq's views are at the least questionable, and while there are moments when the conclusions to be drawn from his broadsides are disturbing, this never negates the value of the work. This is an ambitious book in which Houellebecq asks important questions: if sex is continually degraded by its increasing commodification and, concomitantly, genetics increasingly offers us the opportunity for procreation without recourse to it, where does that leave us? How do we navigate ourselves, afloat as we are, in this new moral universe? What does the increasing pace of scientific change mean to the conversations non-scientists have about our lives? What place does something called spirituality, whatever that means, have in this brave, new world? This is a big, bold, clever book that has already achieved more than cult status in France. Houellebecq should be read, and read carefully, if not always believed. --Mark Thwaite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...