Jump to content

Signature Guidelines


Guest Swiftie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Swiftie

Does someone want to tell me what they think I should do to some members signatures?Should the whole board suffer coz of a certain amount of users?Should a guideline be set so that members know what is allowed and what is not.& for those who still take the P, what should happen?[EDIT] 14/07/08And so let it begin..Below are the forum guidelines for member signature images. Please note that in a lot of cases these guidelines also apply to text based signatures.The maximum overall size for signatures is 550 pixels wide by 170 pixels high. This also includes text as well. Maximum file size should be 60KB in total. NO YOUTUBE or MASSIVELY ANIMATED GIFS.Below is an image depicting the maximum size for signatures.7c3a5cf032c15c0020805e52e0be0ab4.pngInappropriate content includes;

  • Too large, or file size exceeds recommended size.
  • Pornographic, violent or otherwise offensive images, language etc. This may include racist remarks, slander etc...
  • Your signature may not contain links to, or use your signature to link to pages that contain objectionable material. This includes, warez, cracks, pornography, pyramid schemes, and referral ID's.
  • Please do not include signature links of a malicious nature. e.g. those that crash your browser, trigger popup floods or emulate BSOD's.

Would appreciate if members contributed and helped us out too. If you see something inappropriate, let us know as soon as possible (via PM or 'Report to Moderator' feature works) and we will deal with it.Thanks.SwiftieP.S - Yes I got the image and whatnot from somewhere else....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Swiftie

sh*t, wrong room.. BUT OH well... Its good its ended up in here.More inputs..As for me, I was purely going to just TAKE them off everyone and disable them without saying nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LightSkinned Cageman

Just task someone with keeping sigs down/correct, or a current mod/admin or create one.Tbh disabled is cool though, sigs are of little use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Swiftie
Just task someone with keeping sigs down/correct, a current mod/admin or create one.Tbh disabled is cool though, sigs are of little use.
Thing is, there shouldn't be a need. coz then people would take the piss just to see if they get caught out.Would've appreciated users just doing something write (but this aint no utopia)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LightSkinned Cageman
Just task someone with keeping sigs down/correct, a current mod/admin or create one.Tbh disabled is cool though, sigs are of little use.
Thing is, there shouldn't be a need. coz then people would take the piss just to see if they get caught out.Would've appreciated users just doing something write (but this aint no utopia)
True, but in fairness, many users are stupid. If poeple continually take the piss, especially after that happened/this reminder (+the fact this has to get made every month or two) there isnt any excuse & then theirs would be totally taken away for good.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Swiftie

So would everyone that has posted so far say that the fix is to remove all sigs. From all members on the forum? & then before they're re-enabled. Set the guideline. Any one who take's the piss gets whatever punishment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Christophe-Michel
So would everyone that has posted so far say that the fix is to remove all sigs. From all members on the forum? & then before they're re-enabled. Set the guideline. Any one who take's the piss gets whatever punishment?
Nah, anyone who f*cks up with their sigs, gets 1 warning and 1 warning only to change it. If they don't listen, straight bannage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this has been discussed many a timesjust set the guideline and people will abide, maybe make it a sticky at the top of the pageim aware my sig is a bit large (but has no explicit content) - ive never had one until nowif its too big im happy to make it smallerEDIT: if people dont abide....take away their right to a sig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this has been discussed many a timesjust set the guideline and people will abide, maybe make it a sticky at the top of the pageim aware my sig is a bit large (but has no explicit content) - ive never had one until nowif its too big im happy to make it smaller
guilty words
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was it here or rwd where it was set so the sig could only be a certain amount of characters long, and no images etc.Maybe that should just be implemented if anything.Rather than full removal of sigs.I'm not fussed either way though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

f*ck sigs, they aint needed. Just keep avatars. Will clean the place up, decrease loading times and put ease on my scrolling finger.
tbh i think the guidelines needed are:size + contentcoz more time wen im in uni or using my laptop around other people i turn sigs off...once my mum accused me of looking at porn(had to swiftly explain there was a topic of dicussion and replies etc)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Sho'Case

i suppose the easiest thing to do is to disable sigsit isn't like we need them,it's an option that is available to the users of the forumand it gets used by the majoritybut if it's getting abused then cut it off,wasn't matt policing sigs before..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like sigs. Allow people to be unique without making d*ckhead threads for attention. BUT many people take the pis. One guy in this topic is taking the piss with his. They should be no bigger than Swiftie's is now.Prefer if you didn't disable them, I hate having an avatar coz getting one is such hassle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...