Lieutenant Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Got up to page 34, I can't read anymore.2 things..1. Why's man saying technically this, technically that. Agger is a better defender technically then Vidic, what the f*ck does that even mean? :/2. Modric and Iniesta are levels? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blue State Of Mind Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 On the real, certain man still do that man to man comparison thing to assess which team is better in hypothetical situations?Are you 15 yrs old Blue State? You still do that?No-one with half a football brain uses that as an indicator of what team is better, because there things like individual playing style, tactics, managers, form, fitness, mental attributes etc to consider...How many times do i have to tell you, go look at the original comment. I've already said that 1 Barca are technically better than Spurs and 2. theres much more to football than technical ability. I was arguing against the guy that said Spurs weren't all that technically gifted, how many times do i have to explain myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blue State Of Mind Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Got up to page 34, I can't read anymore.2 things..1. Why's man saying technically this, technically that. Agger is a better defender technically then Vidic, what the f*ck does that even mean? :/2. Modric and Iniesta are levels? 1 guy said Spurs aren't technically gifted, typical English team blah blah.Agger is a better player technically in he is a better passer of the ball, has a better touch and is a better striker of the ball. Agger is one of those defenders that would ook equally comfortable in a holding midfield position, thats what it means/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mame Biram Diouf Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 On the real, certain man still do that man to man comparison thing to assess which team is better in hypothetical situations?Are you 15 yrs old Blue State? You still do that?No-one with half a football brain uses that as an indicator of what team is better, because there things like individual playing style, tactics, managers, form, fitness, mental attributes etc to consider...Negged for seriously replying not because i disagree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blue State Of Mind Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 pmslll sick topiccant believe you lot got tricked into debating who are more technical tottenham or barcaObly guy atm i can see limiting xavi and iniesta is a midfield of essien and y.toure but tbh when they tore us apart in the final we had no anderon or hargreaves or fletcherid like to see them up against on form trio of carrick fletcher and anderson would have the energy and ability to chase em down etc and see the ball enough to get a few moves 2geva and im tired not sure what im saying/is portuguese a barca fan now?how did i argue with my arsenal friend during the game telling me Cesc is better then Iniesta and would start all barca need is a LB and Reina and the team is perfect the fluidity oft their attack is just amazing/ronaldo going missing when needed again nice 1Lack of comprehension skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mame Biram Diouf Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 he means like in FMvidic = limited defenderagger = ball playing defender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Kane Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 @Anelka.We've established that Spurs play a traditional English-type game & it works for them.You say that a high line could play to their advantage. Barca are vunerable to counters. That's true.But if Spurs or ANY team tried to play a 'traditional English' game against Barcelona, it would be a massacre. For that kind of approach, the team would have to be VERY open, (which Spurs are) & that works to Barca's advantage moreso than their high line plays to Spurs' advantage.Secondly, why are going on like Barca ain't capable of playing deep? Against United, their defensive line was VERY deep & they fared reasonably well so let's stop going on like Barca can't switch sh*t up if they want. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blue State Of Mind Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 On the real, certain man still do that man to man comparison thing to assess which team is better in hypothetical situations?Are you 15 yrs old Blue State? You still do that?No-one with half a football brain uses that as an indicator of what team is better, because there things like individual playing style, tactics, managers, form, fitness, mental attributes etc to consider...Negged for seriously replying not because i disagreeNegged for acting like i said any of what that Michael Kane wrote, and ignoring the fact that i had already said that there is more to football than just technical ability, when judging individuals and teams as well. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hernandez Balcazar Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Anelka & Blue State Of Mind Should Be Put In A Special Needs Groups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TF S4DK Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Tottenham are mentally better than Real Madrid, as they would have won 3-2, not lost 5-0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blue State Of Mind Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 he means like in FMvidic = limited defenderagger = ball playing defenderWhat you mean like in Fm, have you watched both of them play.Agger is more comfortable on the ball, just like Ferdinand is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blue State Of Mind Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Anelka & Blue State Of Mind Should Be Put In A Special Needs Groups.Your dad should be put in a special needs group.Tell me what i said that was so outlandish and if you say everything it would just confirm the fact that you are a redundant degenerate human being incapable of forming thoughts for yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Kane Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 On the real, certain man still do that man to man comparison thing to assess which team is better in hypothetical situations?Are you 15 yrs old Blue State? You still do that?No-one with half a football brain uses that as an indicator of what team is better, because there things like individual playing style, tactics, managers, form, fitness, mental attributes etc to consider...How many times do i have to tell you, go look at the original comment. I've already said that 1 Barca are technically better than Spurs and 2. theres much more to football than technical ability. I was arguing against the guy that said Spurs weren't all that technically gifted, how many times do i have to explain myself. He had a valid point though.Individually, YES, Spurs have very technical players.But that poster made the accurate point that the COLLECTIVE playing style for the most part isn't based around fluid, technical football in the mould of Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, etc.Do you disagree? If so why, and I'd like evidence. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Portuguese Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Not a Barca fan you just have to hold your hands up when see quality.By the way your midfield will not be able to compete with Barca no matter what form Anderson/Carrick are in because Fletcher wouldn't be able to bully Iniesta/Xavi out of the game for ninety minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blue State Of Mind Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 On the real, certain man still do that man to man comparison thing to assess which team is better in hypothetical situations?Are you 15 yrs old Blue State? You still do that?No-one with half a football brain uses that as an indicator of what team is better, because there things like individual playing style, tactics, managers, form, fitness, mental attributes etc to consider...How many times do i have to tell you, go look at the original comment. I've already said that 1 Barca are technically better than Spurs and 2. theres much more to football than technical ability. I was arguing against the guy that said Spurs weren't all that technically gifted, how many times do i have to explain myself. He had a valid point though.Individually, YES, Spurs have very technical players.But that poster made the accurate point that the COLLECTIVE playing style for the most part isn't based around fluid, technical football in the mould of Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, etc.Do you disagree? If so why, and I'd like evidence. Thanks.I don't disagree but i made my point clear from the beginning that i was referring to them individually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anelka Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 @Anelka.We've established that Spurs play a traditional English-type game & it works for them.You say that a high line could play to their advantage. Barca are vunerable to counters. That's true.But if Spurs or ANY team tried to play a 'traditional English' game against Barcelona, it would be a massacre. For that kind of approach, the team would have to be VERY open, (which Spurs are) & that works to Barca's advantage moreso than their high line plays to Spurs' advantage.Secondly, why are going on like Barca ain't capable of playing deep? Against United, their defensive line was VERY deep & they fared reasonably well so let's stop going on like Barca can't switch sh*t up if they want.My original point was it would be a highly entertaining game, for some of the reasons u have notedI saw the space Barca left 2day, I saw how scared they were of the 'mighty' Theo Walcott, Ive seen Busquetes go walkies at times & thought this could be a cracker, a wide open game..So essentially ur agreeing with me..Also the way Barca play they cud be easily left 1v1 against Lennon & Bale, playing a high or deep line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anelka Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Not a Barca fan you just have to hold your hands up when see quality.By the way your midfield will not be able to compete with Barca no matter what form Anderson/Carrick are in because Fletcher wouldn't be able to bully Iniesta/Xavi out of the game for ninety minutes.RelaxChelsea have done it a few timesLpool did itUtd did it, Barca didnt even score 1 goal and Fergie played Carrick & Scholes with Hargreaves RB I swear..Again people getting ova excited thinking Barcelona are some super heros, TH14 shudda deaded them in 06 but he "ran outta legs" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YesWeCain Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Not a Barca fan you just have to hold your hands up when see quality.By the way your midfield will not be able to compete with Barca no matter what form Anderson/Carrick are in because Fletcher wouldn't be able to bully Iniesta/Xavi out of the game for ninety minutes.RelaxChelsea have done it a few timesLpool did itUtd did it, Barca didnt even score 1 goal and Fergie played Carrick & Scholes with Hargreaves RB I swear..Again people getting ova excited thinking Barcelona are some super heros, TW14 shudda deaded them in 06 but he "ran outta legs"Agreed, spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Kane Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Yes, but the essence of your original point was that English teams like Spurs, should feel that high line gives them a genuine chance at doing REAL damage.Anelka, if Cristiano Ronaldo & Angel Di Maria can't take advantage of this suicidal high line, why do you believe Barcelona should be any more scared of Bale & Lennon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Portuguese Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Rafa did it at the Nou Camp so I give him big ratings they actually scored twice.Chelsea are always meh when they come up against Barca as for Manchester United they got lucky in the away leg of 07/08 when the ref didn't give Messi a penalty he bottled it and gave a free kick instead and we all know what happened in 2009.TH14 not Walcott actually plus that was under Rijkaard that Barca had more magic but didn't keep the ball the way this team does and there was no pressing in that team.They looked like superheroes tonight and them to nights last spring vs your beloved Arsenal especially the first half at the Emirates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hernandez Balcazar Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Spurs v Barca if it did happen would be one of the ties of the 10/11 Champions LeagueWould love to see that mate, even though we'll lose. Two of the best ball playing teams in Europe going head to head. Would be a sick game! Bassong V PuyolCorluca v AlvesJenas v XaviModric v IniestaDefoe v CrouchBale V messibattle of titans thatLennon>>>>>>>>>>>PedroEkotto>>AbidalModric = InestaGallas>>Puyolpussyhole wtfnar suck ur mum how are u comparing iniesta to modric f*ck off u prick dont post in here again you think you got footy knowledge dont reply ill come lewisham and f*ck u up. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Kane Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 On the real, certain man still do that man to man comparison thing to assess which team is better in hypothetical situations?Are you 15 yrs old Blue State? You still do that?No-one with half a football brain uses that as an indicator of what team is better, because there things like individual playing style, tactics, managers, form, fitness, mental attributes etc to consider...How many times do i have to tell you, go look at the original comment. I've already said that 1 Barca are technically better than Spurs and 2. theres much more to football than technical ability. I was arguing against the guy that said Spurs weren't all that technically gifted, how many times do i have to explain myself. He had a valid point though.Individually, YES, Spurs have very technical players.But that poster made the accurate point that the COLLECTIVE playing style for the most part isn't based around fluid, technical football in the mould of Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, etc.Do you disagree? If so why, and I'd like evidence. Thanks.I don't disagree but i made my point clear from the beginning that i was referring to them individually.Well, the whole premise of your argument was a waste because Nemesis' original point was referring to Spurs' technical ability as a collective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Portuguese Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 If Harry Redknapp thinks he can take the game to Barca then he is so naïve didn't Wenger think the same last season.By the way this Barca team has been the best for the last Two years everyone knows they would of been the first team in this current format(since Sacchi's Milan) to retain The European Cup if it wasn't for the ash cloud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anelka Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Yes, but the essence of your original point was that English teams like Spurs, should feel that high line gives them a genuine chance at doing REAL damage.Anelka, if Cristiano Ronaldo & Angel Di Maria can't take advantage of this suicidal high line, why do you believe Barcelona should be any more scared of Bale & Lennon?Spurs play a more direct brand of football..Come on pal u kno thissince lasagne gate they have been looking for Lennon to stretch games then twas Carrick now they have Huddlstone, VDV, Modric & Jenas 2find himNow they have another threat on the left in BalePlus Crouch, say wat eva u like about him but in Europe & International footy, he is a handful..As sh*t as he is in the air, the balls Pepe n co wer pinging up there wudda been won by Crouchy, Benzema didnt put himself about at all..All the English teams have pace on the flanks, Walcott gave them a torrid time in a cameo and in the Camp Nou he didnt make the most of his pace due to his own shiteness@ Portuguese, as good as they played at our ground the score was 2-2 and we went 2da Camp Nou with a inj hit team and didnt employ the correct tactics..Chelsea aint meh they know how 2beat n frustrate Barca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Portuguese Posted November 30, 2010 Report Share Posted November 30, 2010 Do you think Wenger will employ the correct tactics if you meet again?Even if Wenger does Pep will outsmart like did to the Godfather of English football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts