imhim Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 Has anyone ever seen a black downsydrome person ? why di neg ? ive honestly only ever seen white people with it actuallly na i have seen black people (just thinking about it now...) was about to c/s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imhim Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 generally speaking they are all white Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chelsea Jack Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 we have been cursed with this terrible affliction for our devilish crimes against humanity blacks who have downs obviously descend from house slaves Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Somalian Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Ffs lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niall Ferguson Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Niggas still niggas And they gon' be niggas / Srsly tho, shoulda got ten years minimum. CPS should have pushed for murder, seeing as both the actus reus and mens rea for murder were present: actus reus in this case: The actual act of punching the man mens rea: intent to cause GBH. (despite the judge claiming otherwise, which is a disgrace for a judge to do) Would like to read the actual case. Edit: Reading further, it's clear this judge is a bleeding heart liberal and engages in ridiculous judicial activism. Disgraceful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLEAZE BALL Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Punching someone once does not equate to intent to cause GBH you wally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niall Ferguson Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Punching someone once does not equate to intent to cause GBH you wally So how do you explain people who've gone down for murder for punching people then? Punching someone CAN count as GBH, otherwise people wouldn't be sitting on 20 years for doing it. c*nt. I have to be careful, I'm probably arguing with a monkey who's been boxed on these charges already, so knows the criminal law game inside out, but still you're a monkey, so by definition you're dumb. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLEAZE BALL Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 Not gonna trade shit insults with you as its does absolutely nothing for my libido Best thing you can do to avoid sounding silly is to use terms you actually understand in discussion rather than trying to sound clever In this case the judge said theres no intent to cause GBH as theres clearly no evidence of mens rea that can be tested objectively its very basic law 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marly Mar II Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 Ferguson with that a-levell law lmao 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niall Ferguson Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 Not gonna trade sh*t insults with you as its does absolutely nothing for my libido Best thing you can do to avoid sounding silly is to use terms you actually understand in discussion rather than trying to sound clever In this case the judge said theres no intent to cause GBH as theres clearly no evidence of mens rea that can be tested objectively its very basic law Answer my questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLEAZE BALL Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 You got any questions refer to the Archbold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niall Ferguson Posted May 11, 2014 Report Share Posted May 11, 2014 Indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerser Posted May 11, 2014 Report Share Posted May 11, 2014 Not gonna trade sh*t insults with you as its does absolutely nothing for my libido Best thing you can do to avoid sounding silly is to use terms you actually understand in discussion rather than trying to sound clever In this case the judge said theres no intent to cause GBH as theres clearly no evidence of mens rea that can be tested objectively its very basic law Answer my questions. ...Dont push your luck... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.