Letting your partner go places such as napa

[Seth Rollins]

Sagat, whatever your rambling on about to get pos'd didn't have much relation to what i said.Its impossible to take trust out of the equation when that is where every REAL/VALID relationship is based.

You're a clown.It's impossible for YOU. I'm on about the class and type of woman you're settling down with, you're turning it into trust issues as you're putting yourself in this class bracket by arguing this pathetic case and trying to defend it by saying men should trust their slutty girlfriends who rave every weekend and book holidays to Napa/Malia.If you choose to wear this hat, more fool you.

[Seth Rollins]

pmsl shes defo not clued up brah

She can be extremely irritating brisco, but stupid she is not. Trust me.

[KayGee]

Sagat, whatever your rambling on about to get pos'd didn't have much relation to what i said.Its impossible to take trust out of the equation when that is where every REAL/VALID relationship is based.

You're a clown.It's impossible for YOU. I'm on about the class and type of woman you're settling down with, you're turning it into trust issues as you're putting yourself in this class bracket by arguing this pathetic case and trying to defend it by saying men should trust their slutty girlfriends who rave every weekend and book holidays to Napa/Malia.If you choose to wear this hat, more fool you.

Ok hold on a minute, im not arguing any case.. please find where i have tried to defend such behaviours? You idiot. You chose to ignore most of my points, i did infact agree with alot of what you said. I was also the first person to point out the fact that in a serious relationship (settling down) this shouldnt even be thought of.

[Uncle Man]

whilst i cs sagats response and feel it is sufficient i feel compelled to address this specific sentence personally as it is ludicrous statement the modern person will use as a bluff that is generally accepted as being based on fact,(also that i wrote this earlier then came back and dont want to waste a reply i have spent time formulating as this will amount to a waste of time on my part,that will be heinous)

Its impossible to take trust out of the equation when that is where every REAL/VALID relationship is based.

i am going to presume you are qualifying realness and validity with longevity and concord as plausible measurementsfirstly longevity is not a reliable measure of realness or validitywhen we validate something due to longevity,we are observing something from a distance and using time as a measurement alone when we should be using time x fidelity.since fidelity is not readily available to an onlooker or indeed either party,it is wrong to assume that time alone is a measure of realness or validityin furtherance, most 'real/valid' relationships in the sense you are implying are based on a certain amount of leeway and turning a blind eye,eg ppl having mistresses/affaires etc.guys being bisexual enough not to care if theyre women has sex with another man.when one or both parties are freely prepared to do this and use this 'trust' card,you can expect longevity in a relationship due to this elasticity of acceptance and accountabilitythis is the opposite of a real/valid relationship in actualityacquiescence to whimsy is not a measure of genuine concordancei offer this as an alternative statement-'its impossible to take a fulfillment of contractual obligations out of the equation when that is where every REAL/VALID relationship is based'and how do we measure this fulfillment? again this is difficult,which is why i recommend ppl to put there faith in the Lord as an independent adjudicator,one who sees all.with both parties submitting to the Lords judgement nothing can be hidden,and this is why i have been recommending that if the dons want to find a good woman,religion has to be a cornerstone of her foundation.i dont refer to the 'personalised god' religion of a porn star,but a genuine religion. when a women relies on the almighty rather than a jury of her cacaphonic peer demons in her so called soul searching (should i go to ayia napa? etc),she is less likely to falter and use made to order modern excuses which would seek to blame her partner for having 'trust issues' with her entertaining a brace of other men whilst on holiday.this is why ancient man and modern arab man understand that women need to be bound by submission to religion or else they will fly free into the arms of the morning star,lucifer,99.5 times out of a hundred.this is why i have been telling those that will listen that you do not have a srs relationship with the modern western women,the odds are simply not in your favour due to the current position of there hive mindso to avoid a technical breakdown in future try to avoid making wild statements like the above highlightedwomen complain that they are unable to voice there opinion on this internet forum,when an accurate critical assesment of the situation reveals that they simply find it difficult to pass off the feminowhorefascist bullshit they glean from look!magazine and the journal of carrie bradshaw as hard evidence against a crack team of internet relationship lawyersfurthermore please dont feel the need to acknowledge or respond to this missive kaygee,as i write to uncover a general fallacy,the fact that you perpetuate or recite it personally is irrelevent to the thrust of the texti trust that this post is longwinded and boring enough to sink this thread to the depths of the chamber,with the resounding conclusion being that no you dont let your partner go places such as napa,you simply let them go should the question even arise

[KayGee]

I pos'd, i dont agree with everything you said, obviously.. but the good outweighs the bad. Good post.

[Michel Kane]

Social is f*cked.LOL

[Flojo]

loolSocial you need to write a book or a blog at the very least.

[Guest Triple XXX]

acquiescence to whimsy is not a measure of genuine concordance

boyman had to google that still

[E.A.S.E]

F*ck is WRONG with women...

Oi!Not all the women in this thread disagreed with what you were saying.

Did I say all women? Must I specify this EVERY time just so that the idiots of the forum get it as well as the half smart and the smart people?And to think you're probably one of the clued up women on here...SMH.

Ouch, I was only trying to lighten the mood. And Brisco - Come on Mr, Your supposed to be a grown man. There is no need to be like that. Remember you don't actually know me as a person, Do you really need to use any given opertunity you can get to disrespect me?

pmsl shes defo not clued up brah

She can be extremely irritating brisco, but stupid she is not. Trust me.

Thankyou!

[Guest Lemons]

acquiescence to whimsy is not a measure of genuine concordance

boyman had to google that still

LOL

[Speculate]

you know what it is doe, kaygee is tryna argue that there are bitches out there who go raving every weekend and go napa/malia every year who are faithful to their man, however the liklihood of your girl being faithful if she does all these things is extremely low and every man knows this.so if a chick acts like this she is either a straight up hoe or the 1in a 1000 who is naive enough to believe that her antics dont make her man feel insecure./lol just saw socials post. mudting

[Guest Lens]

read social's post up to "Lord"glad it didnt become that type of thread.

[O.Man]

if my girl looked like bria myles i wouldn't let her in sight of another man

[gemma]

Exactly the same as girls going raving. You already KNOW why mandem is there, and yet women STILL insist that them looking their best is NOT for the benefit of being desired by those in there.Women are funny creatures mate.

sorry, but this is just not true. i agree with your posts about napa, but women do not 'dress their best' when they go out because guys will be around. if so, why do girls bother getting dressed up to go out to eat with friends, or to go to a friends for dinner? if anything, women dress for other women. a woman is more likely to appreciate for example, christian louboutins, whereas a man will just see them as sexy shoes.if i am going out to dinner, or going to eat at a friends, etc. i will make an effort with my appearance. the only time i don't is for everyday tasks, work, lounging at home, etc. obviously if you're single you may dress more provocatively, specifically for guys. but to say that a woman dresses up solely for male attention is silly.

I agree!Men can be so delusional thinking that everything we do is for them

[KayGee]

you know what it is doe, kaygee is tryna argue that there are bitches out there who go raving every weekend and go napa/malia every year who are faithful to their man, however the liklihood of your girl being faithful if she does all these things is extremely low and every man knows this.so if a chick acts like this she is either a straight up hoe or the 1in a 1000 who is naive enough to believe that her antics dont make her man feel insecure./lol just saw socials post. mudting

No im not, please go back and read again because you clearly didnt understand.

[Seth Rollins]

It's like they just see our mouths moving and continue to ignore and not take in what's being said, and respond accordingly... *Looks at demolition site*I think we're done here lads, I'll get the drinks in.

[Speculate]

you know what it is doe, kaygee is tryna argue that there are bitches out there who go raving every weekend and go napa/malia every year who are faithful to their man, however the liklihood of your girl being faithful if she does all these things is extremely low and every man knows this.so if a chick acts like this she is either a straight up hoe or the 1in a 1000 who is naive enough to believe that her antics dont make her man feel insecure./lol just saw socials post. mudting

No im not, please go back and read again because you clearly didnt understand.

no, dont care enough

[SoCo KinG]

My chick went magaluf for her mates birthday (there was 11 of them)She didn't like the sleeziness of it and never wants to go on that type of holiday againsometimes you have to let people figure things out for themself.. trying to control someone is just showing that YOU ARE insecure..dont try turn it around.i bet most of the people talking rubbish aren't in long term relationships.

[Seth Rollins]

Lol @ her having a boyfriend to come back to.You're moist fam.

[SoCo KinG]

na you're just immature

[Seth Rollins]

You calling me immature>>>You wifying slores who go them sketty places.Take the L, there's nothing over here for you.

[SoCo KinG]

You calling me immature>>>You wifying slores who go them sketty places.Take the L, there's nothing over here for you.

My chick can go wherever she wants shes her own person..after 2/3 years i know what she's like so i trust her..and im not wifeying slores i was with her before she was even 18 and could go these placesshe goes on her holiday with her 'girls' -- i go on my holiday with the mandem...and we go 1 together..do you even have a girlfriend?..and if you do..how long have you tried to control her life for?

[Seth Rollins]

Are you drunk?You left the L on the table. Please take it with you.Regards.

[Giles Deacon]

to all those women who negged (and possibly a few bitch niggas too)You dress good to feel good about yourself and for women most of your validation for feeling good comes from men. If Suzy, Sarah & Jane tell you your dress is fire thats 1 thing but if no men are paying attention that confidence will quickly disappear.Even if you arent looking to advance the thing with these guys, women are needy creatures, you all want to feel wanted. Even if its just catching that sly glance from jermaine across the room or on the train.

What if you're a fashionable lesbian?

[SoCo KinG]

Yeah, didn't think you'd answer the questions.another immature small minded prick with ignorant "opinions"