Jump to content

Budget 2009


bladerunner

Recommended Posts

I don't wanna break it down.Tax bands depend on declarable income.Declarable income is able to manipulated very easily.So the super rich are avoiding tax quite easily.Also known as a tax loophole.Raising tax on earnings over that amount to 50% will have very little effect.It doesn't take a lot of accounting genius to "lose" that extra amount to bring it back below the threshold.If you want to be pedantic and pretend tax thresholds and loopholes have nothing to do with each other, you do that.But don't try it like I don't know what I'm talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top rate tax should of been coupled with reduction in basic rate tax increasing real income for the masses or exemption entirely for households earning under say £12000.Scrap the Olympics cannot justify £12bn for 2 weeks of sport in this climate, create jobs arguments is rubbish - temporary, low paid etc will not make much difference.Reduce unemployment benefit for the long-term unemployed who are able to work - there is correlation between the generosity of unemployment benefit and long term unemployment rates no surprise why.Reduce child benefits to the first child only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top rate tax should of been coupled with reduction in basic rate tax increasing real income for the masses or exemption entirely for households earning under say £12000.Scrap the Olympics cannot justify £12bn for 2 weeks of sport in this climate, create jobs arguments is rubbish - temporary, low paid etc will not make much difference.Reduce unemployment benefit for the long-term unemployed who are able to work - there is correlation between the generosity of unemployment benefit and long term unemployment rates no surprise why.Reduce child benefits to the first child only.
1. Is the Olympics guaranteed to make a loss when it's all said and done? I've not looked at the figures at all. Of course, scrapping it simply isn't possible now. It would damage the country's rep politically.2. Not possible politically with a labour govt. Tories won't touch it either. Making people poorer doesn't necessarily equate to an increase in motivation to find work. There are also other variables such as being qualified to work. Getting people to this standard costs money. Probably more than it would to pay them the ten quid difference per week.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its a disgracetaxing those who have worked hard 2 assume high paid jobs with responsibilityys to prop up the lazy sub working class toads who have nothing to offersome robin hood politics whihc show how pathetic and low labour have sunk...getting rid of the personal allowance if u earn over 100k is a f*ck*ng disgrace as welll...lets hope the next conservative government redress these shameful measures2 p more on fuel... the cunts
Haha, no chance. If the Tories want the centre ground, they're gonna have to make centre ground concessions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top rate tax should of been coupled with reduction in basic rate tax increasing real income for the masses or exemption entirely for households earning under say £12000.Scrap the Olympics cannot justify £12bn for 2 weeks of sport in this climate, create jobs arguments is rubbish - temporary, low paid etc will not make much difference.Reduce unemployment benefit for the long-term unemployed who are able to work - there is correlation between the generosity of unemployment benefit and long term unemployment rates no surprise why.Reduce child benefits to the first child only.
1. Is the Olympics guaranteed to make a loss when it's all said and done? I've not looked at the figures at all. Of course, scrapping it simply isn't possible now. It would damage the country's rep politically.2. Not possible politically with a labour govt. Tories won't touch it either. Making people poorer doesn't necessarily equate to an increase in motivation to find work. There are also other variables such as being qualified to work. Getting people to this standard costs money. Probably more than it would to pay them the ten quid difference per week.
Initial cost of the olympics was £4bn - at that price it was profitable, at £12bn i have my reservations now. But yes its not feasible to cancel now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lemons
This government is sh*t. Gives me no reasons to try and earn more. Bunch of useless cunts.
So you don't want to earn loads of money anymore becuase the government are going to tax you now?Putting it clearer: Earning £22k p/y beats £100k +?
Yes.I have my reasons.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's still loadsa holes though.If you're clever enough to earn £100k + then you must be clever enough to hide it.e.g. One guy at my work set up a fake business.The company then pays him as a consultant through his company.So he dont directly earn the money.This fake company pays him minimum wage and he claims the rest as dividends as a shareholder.So he pays minimum tax and claims the rest anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...