9/11: 102 Minutes That Changed America - Channel 4

[Mr Q]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8797525979024486145#

[Vtec]

thats more of a building collapsing under its own weight, and imploding, as structural integrity fails. Crushing itself floor by floor, steel frame by steel frame, pulverising the reinforced concrete and windows into dust.

[VENOM]

Thun = that guy who's getting taken to america for hacking into their computers, Thun suffers from the same mental disease.

lmao

dont insult the genius that hacked into their computers by comparing him to this prick who gained his IT engineering degree on youtube

[Thun]

Thun = that guy who's getting taken to america for hacking into their computers, Thun suffers from the same mental disease.

lmao

dont insult the genius that hacked into their computers by comparing him to this prick who gained his IT engineering degree on youtube

Dont upset the joo hunting faggott now

[Thun]

thats more of a building collapsing under its own weight, and imploding, as structural integrity fails. Crushing itself floor by floor, steel frame by steel frame, pulverising the reinforced concrete and windows into dust.

Yeah thats what the government say that it collapsed floor by floor but dont see how it can come down at nearly freefall speeds without some type of explosive force being usedThese guys ask serious questions

As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to firehttp://www.ae911truth.org/

[Captain Planet]

/thread

[VENOM]

all you need to do to prove if its a controlled demoliton or not is to build another 105feet of a building and then blow it up and see how it falls down. all this chat about why it fell so fast is f*ck*ng speculation theories, cos this is the tallest building to ever fall, there is NOthing to compare it to. not even close..

[streets.]

all you need to do to prove if its a controlled demoliton or not is to build another 105feet of a building and then blow it up and see how it falls down. all this chat about why it fell so fast is f*ck*ng speculation theories, cos this is the tallest building to ever fall, there is NOthing to compare it to. not even close..

[VENOM]

http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htmIn every photo and every video, you can see columns far outpacing the collapse of the building. Not only are the columns falling faster than the building but they are also falling faster than the debris cloud which is ALSO falling faster than the building. This proves the buildings fell well below free fall speed. That is, unless the beams had a rocket pointed to the ground.Just look at any video you like and watch the perimeter columns.Deceptive videos stop the timer of the fall at 10:09 when only the perimeter column hits the ground and not the building itself. If you notice, the building just finishes disappearing behind the debris cloud which is still about 40 stories high.Below is a more accurate graphic using a paper written by Dr. Frank Greening which can be found at: http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdfThe paper takes the transfer of momentum into account. Like a billiard ball being hit by another on a pool table, each floor transferred its momentum to the next as represented below. The more weight, the less resistance each floor gave.

[Da Luv Doc]

LOL @ Thun with his dis-information.Yeah I agree Venom, I guess I shouldn't compare Thun to that guy as that breddah actually went out to get the right information from where it would actually be kept.LOL @ Thun.Reminds me of the film true lies, the fake spy who used to hype hes a spy and people are out to get him.You don't research sh*t.LOL @ your link too, a lot of junk and lies put into one and you see it all and are like "yes yes YES THIS MAKES SENSE!" SMHYour a blogger

[VENOM]

[streets.]

Reminds me of the film true lies, the fact spy who used to hype hes a spy and people are out to get him.You don't research sh*t.LOL @ your link too, a lot of junk and lies put into one and you see it all and are like "yes yes YES THIS MAKES SENSE!" SMHYour a blogger

But on a serious note, WTC7 was an inside job. Look at how it fell - the FBI was in the building at the time so they wanted to get rid of any information.

[Thun]

Ejection of Steel Beams and Debris-plumes from the TowersThe horizontal ejection of structural steel members for hundreds of feet and the pulverization of concrete to flour-like powder, observed clearly in the collapses of the WTC towers, provide further evidence for the use of explosives – as well-explained in http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/index.html. (See also, Griffin, 2004, chapter 2.) The observed plumes or "squibs" are far below the pulverization region and therefore deserving ofparticular attention. They appear much like the plumes observed in http://www.implosionworld.com/cinema.htm (e.g., the controlled demolition of the SouthwarkUnlike WTC7, the twin towers appear to have been exploded “top-down” rather than proceeding from the bottom – which is unusual for controlled demolition but clearly possible, depending on the order in which explosives are detonated. That is, explosives may have been placed on higher floors of the towers and exploded via radio signals so as to have early explosions near the region where the plane entered the tower. Certainly this hypothesis ought to be seriously considered in an independent investigation using all available data.http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/...elyCollapse.pdf

A great PDF full of informationLOL at venom, streets and justinVIP2 usual foolsLOL at you dumb cunts not wanting to discuss WTC 7 but say that was controlled demoltion but not WTC 1 and 2 when there is bare evidence

[Da Luv Doc]

Thun = Dunce version of Garry Mccinann

[VENOM]

There were a lot of firsts for the WTC. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been hit with a plane traveling 500 miles an hour and had its fire proofing removed from its trusses. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever had its steel columns which hold lateral load sheared off by a 767. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been a building which had its vertical load bearing columns in its core removed by an airliner. For Building 7, in all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been left for 6-7 hours with its bottom floors on fire with structural damage from another building collapse. Not the Madrid/Windsor tower did not have almost 40 stories of load on its supports after being hit by another building which left a 20 story gash. The Madrid tower lost portions of its steel frame from the fire. Windsor's central core was steel reinforced concrete. In all the history of high-rise fires, not once has ever been any high rise building fire without some fire fighters fighting the fires. except WTC7

[Da Luv Doc]

LOL Thun thinks that a 90+ floor building, wider than a wide bodied aircraft would just fall with no debris smoke.LOLAgain, if it's anti government, anti NWO, it must be right.

[Thun]

There were a lot of firsts for the WTC. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been hit with a plane traveling 500 miles an hour and had its fire proofing removed from its trusses. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever had its steel columns which hold lateral load sheared off by a 767. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been a building which had its vertical load bearing columns in its core removed by an airliner. For Building 7, in all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been left for 6-7 hours with its bottom floors on fire with structural damage from another building collapse. Not the Madrid/Windsor tower did not have almost 40 stories of load on its supports after being hit by another building which left a 20 story gash. The Madrid tower lost portions of its steel frame from the fire. Windsor's central core was steel reinforced concrete. In all the history of high-rise fires, not once has ever been any high rise building fire without some fire fighters fighting the fires. except WTC7

[Da Luv Doc]

I look at these sites and I just think wtf.Like say the planes were any Boeing 737s.Come on, these crafts are larger than the plane it was designed to withstand, though the 767 are slower, they fail to mention that it is slower at altitude not a few hundred/thousand feet of the ground.And they compare them, yet none never want to compare the bigger version that hit, the ER version but try their best with the normal one.LOL

[Thun]

I look at these sites and I just think wtf.

[carpedeum]

the same back and forth thing. one scientist says yes, another says no.

[Da Luv Doc]

SMH.Make up your mind, nano bites or bomb, COME ON THUN, WHICH ONE?!?!?!

[Thun]

nano bites or bomb, COME ON THUN, WHICH ONE?!?!?!

[Da Luv Doc]

That is what your saying, nano bots causing damage.But the jokes on you, anyother failure to discuss which, of your back and forth choices and failure to say why the towers would not fall after being weakened.

[Da Luv Doc]

Just for you thun:lol

[Lofa]

Cannot watch anything related to 9/11.Tears.