Thun Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Mods, delete all their posts and bang em in jailI would but with man like Tipper around (liberal grandads) you can't do sh*t without a song and dance being created.This forum is getting way too serious.Wanting to throw people in jail because some joke is going on in the thread.Doing sh*t like that will only kill the forums.Oh put a d*ck in it (nohomo). You two are killing the thread with none sense that has nothing to do with the thread. If there wasnt any potential, I would say carry on, but 'llow it. This can be a discussionThis is VIP2 not some grandad forum were we stick to topics or get banned.f*ck off elsewere if you want all the topics to be about serious issues.What the f*ck are you talking about you imbecile? "If there wasnt any potential, I would say carry on, but 'llow it. This can be a discussion"Did you not see that? Where does it say all I want is serious topics?Shut up now VIP2 aint as serious as you make it out to be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numero001 Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I love it. You always get stumped coz you dont take the time out to read. IdiotRennaisance man, wouldnt you class that as a flaw in the law tho? Was it proven that it was the other girls knife or something substantial like that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thun Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I love it. You always get stumped coz you dont take the time out to read. IdiotGo do one of your feminine topics as this topic maybe a bit too masculine for you prick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Coquelin Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Feelings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest28 Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 murderervictimno wonder why Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thun Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 FeelingsI think its that time of the month for 001. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Coquelin Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 was referring to you, tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thun Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 was referring to you, tbhGood for you prick whoever you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That's That Kid Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I love it. You always get stumped coz you dont take the time out to read. IdiotRennaisance man, wouldnt you class that as a flaw in the law tho? Was it proven that it was the other girls knife or something substantial like that?It was probably put forward by the girl's defence (Chelsea) that the knife wasn't hers, and that she felt she would be stabbed herself because the two girls were having a scuffle that was so volatile, anything could have happened, in other words it was either her or the other girl. They probably backed this argument based on the dead girl's propensity to do such a thing (her nickname was "pitbull" for instance, which doesn't indicate an angel) and perhaps other things she's done/said etc. All this lead the jury to believe that it actually was an act of survival. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thun Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I love it. You always get stumped coz you dont take the time out to read. IdiotRennaisance man, wouldnt you class that as a flaw in the law tho? Was it proven that it was the other girls knife or something substantial like that? All this lead the jury to believe that it actually was an act of survival.Thats the way I see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flojo Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 FeelingsI think its that time of the month for 001. was referring to you, tbh :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numero001 Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I love it. You always get stumped coz you dont take the time out to read. IdiotRennaisance man, wouldnt you class that as a flaw in the law tho? Was it proven that it was the other girls knife or something substantial like that?It was probably put forward by the girl's defence (Chelsea) that the knife wasn't hers, and that she felt she would be stabbed herself because the two girls were having a scuffle that was so volatile, anything could have happened, in other words it was either her or the other girl. They probably backed this argument based on the dead girl's propensity to do such a thing (her nickname was "pitbull" for instance, which doesn't indicate an angel) and perhaps other things she's done/said etc. All this lead the jury to believe that it actually was an act of survival.To me that is ridiculous. Unless they come to me and say, "Boom, this kitchen knife set from Sian's yard usually holds 5 knives. As you can see, this knife is the missing knife" I aint having that.Boy, something really wrong has happened there. I dont want to call it racism, but this seems like a miscarriage to me. Man got life and he never took someones life, proven. Thats badmind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badman Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 thats the very reason why i dont carry weapons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tronics Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I love it. You always get stumped coz you dont take the time out to read. IdiotRennaisance man, wouldnt you class that as a flaw in the law tho? Was it proven that it was the other girls knife or something substantial like that?It was probably put forward by the girl's defence (Chelsea) that the knife wasn't hers, and that she felt she would be stabbed herself because the two girls were having a scuffle that was so volatile, anything could have happened, in other words it was either her or the other girl. They probably backed this argument based on the dead girl's propensity to do such a thing (her nickname was "pitbull" for instance, which doesn't indicate an angel) and perhaps other things she's done/said etc. All this lead the jury to believe that it actually was an act of survival.To me that is ridiculous. Unless they come to me and say, "Boom, this kitchen knife set from Sian's yard usually holds 5 knives. As you can see, this knife is the missing knife" I aint having that.Boy, something really wrong has happened there. I dont want to call it racism, but this seems like a miscarriage to me. Man got life and he never took someones life, proven. Thats badmindc/sWhether or not the knife was hers is irrelevant imo because she then used it knowing it would cause serious injury.What makes it worse is that the other girl didn't have a weapon so her case that she did it as an 'act of survival' is debatable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That's That Kid Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I love it. You always get stumped coz you dont take the time out to read. IdiotRennaisance man, wouldnt you class that as a flaw in the law tho? Was it proven that it was the other girls knife or something substantial like that?It was probably put forward by the girl's defence (Chelsea) that the knife wasn't hers, and that she felt she would be stabbed herself because the two girls were having a scuffle that was so volatile, anything could have happened, in other words it was either her or the other girl. They probably backed this argument based on the dead girl's propensity to do such a thing (her nickname was "pitbull" for instance, which doesn't indicate an angel) and perhaps other things she's done/said etc. All this lead the jury to believe that it actually was an act of survival.To me that is ridiculous. Unless they come to me and say, "Boom, this kitchen knife set from Sian's yard usually holds 5 knives. As you can see, this knife is the missing knife" I aint having that.Boy, something really wrong has happened there. I dont want to call it racism, but this seems like a miscarriage to me. Man got life and he never took someones life, proven. Thats badmindThat's for the jury to decide. And yes, there are numerous instabilities with jury trials, but that's how the criminal justice system has worked for centuries. Also, don't take what I said as gospel. The defence would have been ten times more sophisticated and rational than the way I put it. I just tried to bring it low because I couldn't be bothered to type longness. Go and see a trial if you want to see how it works.Self defence is an absolute defence that if proven beyond reasonable doubt, will result in acquittal.Incidentally, I urge any doubter of the criminal justice system to actually go and watch a serious murder trial if possible. I guarantee you you will leave having more faith in the system. It's not about being ignorant of the democratic structures that keep the law in place. Believe you me, the judiciary and judicial system is FAR more open than the system of parliamentary democracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hhhhhhh8 Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 FeelingsI think its that time of the month for 001. was referring to you, tbh :lol:LMAO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djbmc Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 wot a load of sh*t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drifterman Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 good lawyers are a valuable commodity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djbmc Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I love it. You always get stumped coz you dont take the time out to read. IdiotRennaisance man, wouldnt you class that as a flaw in the law tho? Was it proven that it was the other girls knife or something substantial like that?It was probably put forward by the girl's defence (Chelsea) that the knife wasn't hers, and that she felt she would be stabbed herself because the two girls were having a scuffle that was so volatile, anything could have happened, in other words it was either her or the other girl. They probably backed this argument based on the dead girl's propensity to do such a thing (her nickname was "pitbull" for instance, which doesn't indicate an angel) and perhaps other things she's done/said etc. All this lead the jury to believe that it actually was an act of survival.To me that is ridiculous. Unless they come to me and say, "Boom, this kitchen knife set from Sian's yard usually holds 5 knives. As you can see, this knife is the missing knife" I aint having that.Boy, something really wrong has happened there. I dont want to call it racism, but this seems like a miscarriage to me. Man got life and he never took someones life, proven. Thats badmind who got life for wot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ankle Murda Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Oh dear, I remember this.This is going to have serious consequences... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tulse Hill Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Frank Sinatra " Thats Lifeeeeeeeeeeee " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ankle Murda Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I love it. You always get stumped coz you dont take the time out to read. IdiotRennaisance man, wouldnt you class that as a flaw in the law tho? Was it proven that it was the other girls knife or something substantial like that?It was probably put forward by the girl's defence (Chelsea) that the knife wasn't hers, and that she felt she would be stabbed herself because the two girls were having a scuffle that was so volatile, anything could have happened, in other words it was either her or the other girl. They probably backed this argument based on the dead girl's propensity to do such a thing (her nickname was "pitbull" for instance, which doesn't indicate an angel) and perhaps other things she's done/said etc. All this lead the jury to believe that it actually was an act of survival.To me that is ridiculous. Unless they come to me and say, "Boom, this kitchen knife set from Sian's yard usually holds 5 knives. As you can see, this knife is the missing knife" I aint having that.Boy, something really wrong has happened there. I dont want to call it racism, but this seems like a miscarriage to me. Man got life and he never took someones life, proven. Thats badmind who got life for wot?I think he's talking about that West African yout who was involved in that gunfight that killed that Polish lady in New Cross. He didn't fire the fatal bullet, the judge even said it.And apparently it was the same for Crazy Titch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djbmc Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 f*ck off!!!!! They got done for murder when they didn't do sh*t?!?!?! That is f*ck*ng bollocks mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Cos she was white bait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ankle Murda Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 f*ck off!!!!! They got done for murder when they didn't do sh*t?!?!?! That is f*ck*ng bollocks mate.For real.That's life man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.