Lampard > Scholes > Gerrard

[Dat Boy B]

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11668_5867711,00.html

Yet another accolade to hes name.

Frank lampard >>>

[Guest R9]

This is the football you man are gona be kickin in the new years.

OLOOLOL

[Guest Lens]

Alex>>Lens>>Ice

Been saying it since 05 and its trueeeeee

Baffed, where do I come in to it?

But yeah, Lampard' and Scholes are way better than Gerrard. Crap 1-footed diver.

[kerser]

 

[Thizz]

On 24/12/2009 at 4:43 PM, HangTheDJ said:

A victim of poor management at international level and unfortunate to have spent his career at one of the most disliked clubs in the world.Had he moved to Man Utd/Liverpool/Arsenal in 2001 and had similar success he'd be considered a true great.His form this season has been immense, probably some of his best stuff. Season on season he gets better and better.Quality player.

Facts. 

 

His 2009/10 season >>>>> anything Scholes or Gerrard even came close to producing 

[JOHN DOE]

silly boy 

[dayomesaydayo]

Id pick scholes but bias aside theres not much between the three atall.

[i5_PRODUCER]

Scholes will always be the MVP of this debate.

 

 

[Benicio del Toney]

Lamps was probably the least technically gifted but his football brain was better than both imo.

I seen Scholes lose possession in some silly places that led to important goals against his team ie: Rivaldo at World Cup.

+ give away silly fouls for no reason all the time.

Of course he was a top player though.

Gerrard positionally naive, too gung ho and it cost Liverpool and England tbh.

Was like Bryan Robson, without the intelligence.