Jump to content

The Race for 4th Is Over COYS

Guest Malcolm Tucker

By Guest Malcolm Tucker
in Sports Room Archive

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 323
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Flojo
Flojo

Debating with Chelsea fans is f*ck*ng ridiculous, they actually have zero sense of realism since they're living in a fantasy world.You've got upwards of 80 million sitting on your bench sometimes and

TF S4DK
TF S4DK

Why you still in this topic? Champions League only.

LS
LS

Swear you guys are going to finish 7th this year? You have no money and you are more closer to the mid table clubs (Everton/Fulham) than the likes of Chelsea and Utd. Not sending, just stating facts

What A CUNT. Newbie

What A CUNT.

Posted
Posted
Debating with Chelsea fans is f*ck*ng ridiculous, they actually have zero sense of realism since they're living in a fantasy world.You've got upwards of 80 million sitting on your bench sometimes and you're talking about over spending on transfers?£16 million on Obi Mikel or £18 million on Masch?You spent £30 million on Shevchenko and you're talking about Kronkamp (who we made a profit on)?Madness.The quicker Abramovich gets bored the better then you can come back down to earth.
Well we're talking about Rafa here, what does Chelsea have to do with anything that's being dicsussed in this topic?And Mikel wasn't £16m, documents were forged and Chelsea settled out of court with his previous club getting most of the money back. Do your research.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Flojo Newbie

Flojo

Posted
Posted
Debating with Chelsea fans is f*ck*ng ridiculous, they actually have zero sense of realism since they're living in a fantasy world.You've got upwards of 80 million sitting on your bench sometimes and you're talking about over spending on transfers?£16 million on Obi Mikel or £18 million on Masch?You spent £30 million on Shevchenko and you're talking about Kronkamp (who we made a profit on)?Madness.The quicker Abramovich gets bored the better then you can come back down to earth.
Well we're talking about Rafa here, what does Chelsea have to do with anything that's being dicsussed in this topic?And Mikel wasn't £16m, documents were forged and Chelsea settled out of court with his previous club getting most of the money back. Do your research.
We are talking about Rafa here but to get a sense of bias and perspective I have to mention who he's competing with. Everything he does is news, he waved his hand one time and the following week managers were up in arms. His transfers are put under more scrutiny than any other managers.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
What A CUNT. Newbie

What A CUNT.

Posted
Posted
Debating with Chelsea fans is f*ck*ng ridiculous, they actually have zero sense of realism since they're living in a fantasy world.You've got upwards of 80 million sitting on your bench sometimes and you're talking about over spending on transfers?£16 million on Obi Mikel or £18 million on Masch?You spent £30 million on Shevchenko and you're talking about Kronkamp (who we made a profit on)?Madness.The quicker Abramovich gets bored the better then you can come back down to earth.
Well we're talking about Rafa here, what does Chelsea have to do with anything that's being dicsussed in this topic?And Mikel wasn't £16m, documents were forged and Chelsea settled out of court with his previous club getting most of the money back. Do your research.
We are talking about Rafa here but to get a sense of bias and perspective I have to mention who he's competing with. Everything he does is news, he waved his hand one time and the following week managers were up in arms. His transfers are put under more scrutiny than any other managers.
Was only Ferguson and his boy Allardyce playing games, nobody else gave a f*ck.You say 'competing with' as if Benitez hasn't had a lot of money to play with.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Flojo Newbie

Flojo

Posted
Posted

About nobody gave a f*ck it was on the back page of half the newspapers, to the media Benitez is always good for some Benitez has not had a lot of money compared to Man United & Chelsea who are incidentally the two teams who've won the league while he's been here. Pay less attention to commos/journos/pundits chatting sh*t and actually think about things objectively.You're highlighting Kronkamp and Josemi who cost £2m collectively as evidence of him wasting money, you man bought Glen Johnson for £6 million sold him for £4 million and were willing to buy him back at £18 million 2 years later just to spite us. We're not in the same financial bracket, not even a debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
n/a Newbie

n/a

Posted
Posted
About nobody gave a f*ck it was on the back page of half the newspapers, to the media Benitez is always good for some Benitez has not had a lot of money compared to Man United & Chelsea who are incidentally the two teams who've won the league while he's been here. Pay less attention to commos/journos/pundits chatting sh*t and actually think about things objectively.You're highlighting Kronkamp and Josemi who cost £2m collectively as evidence of him wasting money, you man bought Glen Johnson for £6 million sold him for £4 million and were willing to buy him back at £18 million 2 years later just to spite us. We're not in the same financial bracket, not even a debate.
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=frontpage&Itemid=1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mame Biram Diouf Newbie

Mame Biram Diouf

Posted
Posted
About nobody gave a f*ck it was on the back page of half the newspapers, to the media Benitez is always good for some Benitez has not had a lot of money compared to Man United & Chelsea who are incidentally the two teams who've won the league while he's been here. Pay less attention to commos/journos/pundits chatting sh*t and actually think about things objectively.You're highlighting Kronkamp and Josemi who cost £2m collectively as evidence of him wasting money, you man bought Glen Johnson for £6 million sold him for £4 million and were willing to buy him back at £18 million 2 years later just to spite us. We're not in the same financial bracket, not even a debate.
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=frontpage&Itemid=1
PMSLLL[FLOJO]DUN HIS DISCOTEQUE[FLOJO]LIVERPOOL = 249MILLMAN UTD = 193MILL2004(WHEN RAFA TOOK OVER)-2009
Link to comment
Share on other sites
n/a Newbie

n/a

Posted
Posted
ARE YOU f*ckERS RETARDED. WE SELL PLAYERS AND BUY THEM WITH THE P WE SELL THEM WITH. THIIIIIIIIIIIIS IS MEASURED BY f*ck*ng EXPENDITURE WE HAVE ONE OF THE LOWEST IN THE COUNTRY. ONLY ARSENAL SPEND LESS EVEN f*ck*ng VILLA SPENT MORE
if ur manager is given £250 million over 5 years to spendwould you a) invest in a quality team/squad and win the leagueor b ) invest in average players, having a high turnover, but have a relatively low net spendlet me no
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Flojo Newbie

Flojo

Posted
Posted
ARE YOU f*ckERS RETARDED. WE SELL PLAYERS AND BUY THEM WITH THE P WE SELL THEM WITH. THIIIIIIIIIIIIS IS MEASURED BY f*ck*ng EXPENDITURE WE HAVE ONE OF THE LOWEST IN THE COUNTRY. ONLY ARSENAL SPEND LESS EVEN f*ck*ng VILLA SPENT MORE
lol I've explained this in every way imaginable over the past few years but some man refuse to believe that what they read in the Sun is wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Infamous Newbie

The Infamous

Posted
Posted
ARE YOU f*ckERS RETARDED. WE SELL PLAYERS AND BUY THEM WITH THE P WE SELL THEM WITH. THIIIIIIIIIIIIS IS MEASURED BY f*ck*ng EXPENDITURE WE HAVE ONE OF THE LOWEST IN THE COUNTRY. ONLY ARSENAL SPEND LESS EVEN f*ck*ng VILLA SPENT MORE
if ur manager is given £250 million over 5 years to spendwould you a) invest in a quality team/squad and win the leagueor b ) invest in average players, having a high turnover, but have a relatively low net spendlet me no
ERRRRRRRRRRRMseeing as this is the squad he got when he came in and only the highlighted remained for little while1 Poland GK Jerzy Dudek2 Switzerland DF Stéphane Henchoz3 Republic of Ireland DF Steve Finnan4 Finland DF Sami Hyypiä5 Czech Republic FW Milan Baroš6 Germany DF Markus Babbel7 Australia MF Harry Kewell8 England FW Emile Heskey9 Senegal FW El Hadji Diouf10 England FW Michael Owen11 Czech Republic MF Vladimír Šmicer12 Wales GK Paul Jones (to January)13 England MF Danny Murphy15 Senegal MF Salif Diao16 Germany MF Dietmar Hamann17 England MF Steven Gerrard18 Norway DF John Arne Riise20 France MF Anthony Le Tallec21 Mali DF Djimi Traoré22 England GK Chris Kirkland23 England DF Jamie Carragher24 France FW Florent Sinama-Pongolle25 Croatia MF Igor Bišćan26 Republic of Ireland MF Richie Partridge27 France DF Grégory Vignal28 France DF Bruno Cheyrou29 France GK Patrice Luzi32 England MF John Welsh33 England FW Neil Mellor34 Republic of Ireland MF Darren Potter36 England DF Jon Otsemobor40 England GK Paul HarrisonDon't think £250million could make a whole squad of 18 (plus fringe players)I don't know about you BUT realistically in this current climate this aint possibleWe sold/released all those f*ckers off our wage bill and signed guys like Torres and Aquilani. That isn't SPENDING that is selling before you buy and that is measured by EXPENDITURE
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captain Planet Newbie

Captain Planet

Posted
Posted
ARE YOU f*ckERS RETARDED. WE SELL PLAYERS AND BUY THEM WITH THE P WE SELL THEM WITH. THIIIIIIIIIIIIS IS MEASURED BY f*ck*ng EXPENDITURE WE HAVE ONE OF THE LOWEST IN THE COUNTRY. ONLY ARSENAL SPEND LESS EVEN f*ck*ng VILLA SPENT MORE
if ur manager is given £250 million over 5 years to spendwould you a) invest in a quality team/squad and win the leagueor b ) invest in average players, having a high turnover, but have a relatively low net spendlet me no
I would choose b, because one of the top 7 selected managers in the world swears by it
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...