Letting your partner go places such as napa

[thinkingthuglife]

y so emotional? n kong hw many times u been cheated on coz u sound paranoid!

[Michel Kane]

Why do people get some sort of validation like their opinion is worth more because they're "in a relationship"I was in a relationship 5 weeks ago that lasted 7 months and I was in a relationship 1.5 years ago that lasted 2 years, it doesn't mean I thought my opinion was any more valid because I was attached.f*cks sake. This "UR JUS A NO GF LOSER N HAV TRUST ISSUEZ GROWIN UP N U R BARE IMMATURE" retort is played out."

the modern women,all those posting in this thread included,view there sexual career in the same way a human being views a curriculum vitae. to not be in a relationship is to be unemployed.to be linking random brehs as a staple is cash in hand work which is fine on the side to a solid income but otherwise unreliable.they feel that with each relationship they are learning new skills and reaching projected targets by staying for two years then moving on to gain more skills and be a more complete functional woman. (ironically all this promotes is dysfunction and an inflated sense of self worth similar to bankers that prompt stock market crashes through non existent wealth creation)this is why srs relationships do not occur with these ppl,as you the employer can not expect employee loyalty at a set wage rate given the world of career opportunities and various perks available with there next big assignment.to work at the same company for yr whole career mite suggest a lack of ambition or sense of adventure,despite the possibility to work yr way up the ladder to the board of directors

Brilliance.I'm tweeting excerpts from this piece.The bolded made my eyes widen.

[Uncle Man]

nothing wrong with going on holiday with yr partner but if yr going on holiday without yr partner its not a serious realationship imo

Idiot

i said there were exceptions,but for me a serious relationship consists of two ppl who will be looking to spend there time together with a view to settling down and starting a family etc,anything else = not ready to settle down yet which mite as well just be casual dating/experimenting with faithfulness in the hopes of receiving a badgebefore ppl say we do things backwards nowadays,my no nonsense approach is quietly refreshing and has given me an idea for a sitcom which will be a blend of goodnight sweetheart and california man

[Guest M12 Part 2]

LOOOL i was about to post the same thing angelo.You're not a higher being or some guru because youve been in a relationship thats lasted longer than 6 months. i fully cs all the talk from goliath and a couple others in here and i been in a relationship for 1.5 years.To SoCo your girl wen magaluf . there is nothing in magaluf except partying and sex. the sun and sand element is sh*t and so is the accomodation. Even if 50% of her friends are sore and wentand got banged. this doesnt bode well for you."Birds of a feather flock together"Plus the fact these slores will be rationalising to your girlfriend that what they are doing is ok, and if these are girls your wifey rates, they will have an influence on her actions#jus sayin

Again things change because some of your points a valid about the friends..there was 11 of them..but they didn't stick together they was in groups of 4/3 my girlfriends group being the group that only went out 2 nights..didn't like it..then stayed at the 5 star hotel (yes 5 star not a shittin partying hotel) in the evenings and just enjoyed the sun by the pool in the day..and i know this because nearly every night we spoke on facebook or she rang me from about 9 o clock onwards..but everyone explained there situation down to every detail every post would be stupidly long..which is why you shouldn't judge

theres 2 schools of thought 1 your wifey has gassed you2 she is truly in the minority of girls who go to these places and are goodeither way the point most man on here are tryna get across is.If it looks like chicken,smells like chicken and tastes like chicken. I aint gonna waste my time running forensic tests and tracing its ancestory. its a chicken.There is no point fighting hard to try and find anomalies. Its a harsh wayof looking at things but if you start trying to rationalise a lot of things that dont make sense, you turn into that d*ckhead who says."Her and Jermaine are just friends she just stays over at his and sleeps in the same bed because they are close, nothing would ever happen"Why waste your time on something like that. when there are plenty chicks out there who would not even entertain the idea of going napa in the first place

[Guest M12 Part 2]

Why do people get some sort of validation like their opinion is worth more because they're "in a relationship"I was in a relationship 5 weeks ago that lasted 7 months and I was in a relationship 1.5 years ago that lasted 2 years, it doesn't mean I thought my opinion was any more valid because I was attached.f*cks sake. This "UR JUS A NO GF LOSER N HAV TRUST ISSUEZ GROWIN UP N U R BARE IMMATURE" retort is played out."

the modern women,all those posting in this thread included,view there sexual career in the same way a human being views a curriculum vitae. to not be in a relationship is to be unemployed.to be linking random brehs as a staple is cash in hand work which is fine on the side to a solid income but otherwise unreliable.they feel that with each relationship they are learning new skills and reaching projected targets by staying for two years then moving on to gain more skills and be a more complete functional woman. (ironically all this promotes is dysfunction and an inflated sense of self worth similar to bankers that prompt stock market crashes through non existent wealth creation)this is why srs relationships do not occur with these ppl,as you the employer can not expect employee loyalty at a set wage rate given the world of career opportunities and various perks available with there next big assignment.to work at the same company for yr whole career mite suggest a lack of ambition or sense of adventure,despite the possibility to work yr way up the ladder to the board of directors

Brilliance.I'm tweeting excerpts from this piece.The bolded made my eyes widen.

BARS UPON BARS

[Uncle Man]

thank you for the support michaelfeel free to appropriate excerpts but dont make them traceable to this accounti fight this war not for personal recognition,but so little by little something can be doneif one man reads my post and tells his friend to check his girl,that is a small victory for me,and for mankind in turn

[SoCo KinG]

But the only evidence people on here have is the fact they've beat girls in relationships but the girls that wernt interested in..they forgotten them, they don't realize that maybe the girls rejecting them were rejecting them because they were in relationships.... Example..ur in napa...you try 'chat up' 10 girls...all in relationships...5 of them you beat..5 of them air you..you're not going to even know or remember if the 5 that air'd you are in a relationship..all you're going to know about is the 5 that you did beat..so thats going to put into ur mind that all girls in relationships cheat..when actually it was 50/50get my point?

[Guest M12 Part 2]

But the only evidence people on here have is the fact they've beat girls in relationships but the girls that wernt interested in..they forgotten them, they don't realize that maybe the girls rejecting them were rejecting them were in relationships.... Example..ur in napa...you try 'chat up' 10 girls...all in relationships...5 of them you beat..5 of them air you..you're not going to even know or remember if the 5 that air'd you are in a relationship..all you're going to know about is the 5 that you did beat..so thats going to put into ur mind that all girls in relationships cheat..when actually it was 50/50get my point?

slightly but ur argument is flawed.How do i know the girl that parred me isnt going to get moved by the next guy who chats to her. Or the girl i just beat hasnt spent the whole holiday parring off guys and i caught her out with some nice game or was in the right place at the right time

[Uncle Man]

lol soco king thinks there is one guy out in napa vs 100,000 hungry witchesmite as well book yr next holiday to disneyland brew

[Michel Kane]

TBH, I think the bottom line is, why are you putting yourself in those kind of environments?Male or female, what does that say about you? Especially if you're in a relationship.It's also a question of priorities.I could be in a relationship. My boys could arrange a trip tp Napa, Miami, etc. I may want to go, but I know what MAY go down there & I'll be aware of how my GF may think of it. In an ideal world, I'll take into account her feelings & prioritise her. No Miami/Napa for me.That's in an ideal world. We don't live in one.Most would go put themselves in this environment regardless.If my GF did go, I'd question the essence of our relationship TBH. It isn't just restricted to holidays either.

[Guest Awesome Kong]

But the only evidence people on here have is the fact they've beat girls in relationships but the girls that wernt interested in..they forgotten them, they don't realize that maybe the girls rejecting them were rejecting them because they were in relationships.... Example..ur in napa...you try 'chat up' 10 girls...all in relationships...5 of them you beat..5 of them air you..you're not going to even know or remember if the 5 that air'd you are in a relationship..all you're going to know about is the 5 that you did beat..so thats going to put into ur mind that all girls in relationships cheat..when actually it was 50/50get my point?

LOL There are some who will not, but the majority of the "with someone" girls will give out. If they do not communicate with any male then they probably wont cheat, but be true to yourself, if she gonna go them places on a regular basis then you'll fail in life, with women, with your kids etc etc

[Guest Yilmaz]

Why do people get some sort of validation like their opinion is worth more because they're "in a relationship"I was in a relationship 5 weeks ago that lasted 7 months and I was in a relationship 1.5 years ago that lasted 2 years, it doesn't mean I thought my opinion was any more valid because I was attached.f*cks sake. This "UR JUS A NO GF LOSER N HAV TRUST ISSUEZ GROWIN UP N U R BARE IMMATURE" retort is played out."

the modern women,all those posting in this thread included,view there sexual career in the same way a human being views a curriculum vitae. to not be in a relationship is to be unemployed.to be linking random brehs as a staple is cash in hand work which is fine on the side to a solid income but otherwise unreliable.they feel that with each relationship they are learning new skills and reaching projected targets by staying for two years then moving on to gain more skills and be a more complete functional woman. (ironically all this promotes is dysfunction and an inflated sense of self worth similar to bankers that prompt stock market crashes through non existent wealth creation)this is why srs relationships do not occur with these ppl,as you the employer can not expect employee loyalty at a set wage rate given the world of career opportunities and various perks available with there next big assignment.to work at the same company for yr whole career mite suggest a lack of ambition or sense of adventure,despite the possibility to work yr way up the ladder to the board of directors

I get what you're saying and it's a nice analogy, but it's silly to paint an entire demographic (the modern woman) in this way. I just have to ask: What, in your eyes, is the best way for a female to conduct themselves with regards to men? What people do relationships occur with?I'm not criticising, I'd just like to follow your assertions to their logical conclusion, as I see this sort of opinion often on VIP2.Very often, it's men who lead women up the garden path then dump them like old boots. I sincerely believe, and certainly in my experience, that a lot of women get into a "linkage" ting with a secret hope that it will end up as a relationship. A lot of women are there for the taking once intercourse has taken place, particularly if you're good to them and can offer them that long term security.

[SoCo KinG]

But the only evidence people on here have is the fact they've beat girls in relationships but the girls that wernt interested in..they forgotten them, they don't realize that maybe the girls rejecting them were rejecting them were in relationships.... Example..ur in napa...you try 'chat up' 10 girls...all in relationships...5 of them you beat..5 of them air you..you're not going to even know or remember if the 5 that air'd you are in a relationship..all you're going to know about is the 5 that you did beat..so thats going to put into ur mind that all girls in relationships cheat..when actually it was 50/50get my point?

slightly but ur argument is flawed.How do i know the girl that parred me isnt going to get moved by the next guy who chats to her. Or the girl i just beat hasnt spent the whole holiday parring off guys and i caught her out with some nice game or was in the right place at the right time

exactly..so you can't say all the girls cheat and as your evidence only have the fact people have banged alot of girls in a relationship... because you don't know what the other half of the girls in a relationship were doing,if they were doing anything at all that isunless you have an accurate percentage of "girls in relationships" that cheated and that didn't....you have no arguement to back up the talk.

[Michel Kane]

Why do people get some sort of validation like their opinion is worth more because they're "in a relationship"I was in a relationship 5 weeks ago that lasted 7 months and I was in a relationship 1.5 years ago that lasted 2 years, it doesn't mean I thought my opinion was any more valid because I was attached.f*cks sake. This "UR JUS A NO GF LOSER N HAV TRUST ISSUEZ GROWIN UP N U R BARE IMMATURE" retort is played out."

the modern women,all those posting in this thread included,view there sexual career in the same way a human being views a curriculum vitae. to not be in a relationship is to be unemployed.to be linking random brehs as a staple is cash in hand work which is fine on the side to a solid income but otherwise unreliable.they feel that with each relationship they are learning new skills and reaching projected targets by staying for two years then moving on to gain more skills and be a more complete functional woman. (ironically all this promotes is dysfunction and an inflated sense of self worth similar to bankers that prompt stock market crashes through non existent wealth creation)this is why srs relationships do not occur with these ppl,as you the employer can not expect employee loyalty at a set wage rate given the world of career opportunities and various perks available with there next big assignment.to work at the same company for yr whole career mite suggest a lack of ambition or sense of adventure,despite the possibility to work yr way up the ladder to the board of directors

I get what you're saying and it's a nice analogy, but it's silly to paint an entire demographic (the modern woman) in this way. I just have to ask: What, in your eyes, is the best way for a female to conduct themselves with regards to men? What people do relationships occur with?I'm not criticising, I'd just like to follow your assertions to their logical conclusion, as I see this sort of opinion often on VIP2.Very often, it's men who lead women up the garden path then dump them like old boots. I sincerely believe, and certainly in my experience, that a lot of women get into a "linkage" ting with a secret hope that it will end up as a relationship. A lot of women are there for the taking once intercourse has taken place, particularly if you're good to them and can offer them that long term security.

Men do this, because they find it 'necessary'. It's a difficult skill, to be able to tell a woman outright, ''I'm just here for the sex, what are you waiting for?'', depending on your social 'value'.

[SoCo KinG]

But the only evidence people on here have is the fact they've beat girls in relationships but the girls that wernt interested in..they forgotten them, they don't realize that maybe the girls rejecting them were rejecting them because they were in relationships.... Example..ur in napa...you try 'chat up' 10 girls...all in relationships...5 of them you beat..5 of them air you..you're not going to even know or remember if the 5 that air'd you are in a relationship..all you're going to know about is the 5 that you did beat..so thats going to put into ur mind that all girls in relationships cheat..when actually it was 50/50get my point?

LOL There are some who will not, but the majority of the "with someone" girls will give out. If they do not communicate with any male then they probably wont cheat, but be true to yourself, if she gonna go them places on a regular basis then you'll fail in life, with women, with your kids etc etc

Fair enough on a "REGULAR BASIS"... First smart thing you've said

[SoCo KinG]

TBH, I think the bottom line is, why are you putting yourself in those kind of environments?Male or female, what does that say about you? Especially if you're in a relationship.It's also a question of priorities.I could be in a relationship. My boys could arrange a trip tp Napa, Miami, etc. I may want to go, but I know what MAY go down there & I'll be aware of how my GF may think of it. In an ideal world, I'll take into account her feelings & prioritise her. No Miami/Napa for me.That's in an ideal world. We don't live in one.Most would go put themselves in this environment regardless.If my GF did go, I'd question the essence of our relationship TBH. It isn't just restricted to holidays either.

Yeh BUT if you DID decide to go because of any amount of different reasons...it doesn't mean you couldn;t go have a good time WITHOUT being unfaithful...is what i'm saying

[Angelo]

Very often, it's men who lead women up the garden path then dump them like old boots.

Argh if I could neg you 1000 times for this I would.Men and Women are EQUALLY guilty of getting bored in a relationship and orchestrating it's demise.Men are, MORE OR LESS, upfront.Women play all sorts of f*ck*ng mind games, in the hope that it will die or that the guy will "get the hint" when in reality most guys wonder why certain things are happening and try HARDER to make it work.Women are the most retarded creatures when it comes to ending a relationship they are unhappy in.

[Guest Awesome Kong]

But the only evidence people on here have is the fact they've beat girls in relationships but the girls that wernt interested in..they forgotten them, they don't realize that maybe the girls rejecting them were rejecting them because they were in relationships.... Example..ur in napa...you try 'chat up' 10 girls...all in relationships...5 of them you beat..5 of them air you..you're not going to even know or remember if the 5 that air'd you are in a relationship..all you're going to know about is the 5 that you did beat..so thats going to put into ur mind that all girls in relationships cheat..when actually it was 50/50get my point?

LOL There are some who will not, but the majority of the "with someone" girls will give out. If they do not communicate with any male then they probably wont cheat, but be true to yourself, if she gonna go them places on a regular basis then you'll fail in life, with women, with your kids etc etc

Fair enough on a "REGULAR BASIS"... First smart thing you've said

You think they have to go there on a regular? Ask Lulu, she'll tell you about her friend who had a boyfriend who got loose.

[Uncle Man]

TBH, I think the bottom line is, why are you putting yourself in those kind of environments?Male or female, what does that say about you? Especially if you're in a relationship.It's also a question of priorities.I could be in a relationship. My boys could arrange a trip tp Napa, Miami, etc. I may want to go, but I know what MAY go down there & I'll be aware of how my GF may think of it. In an ideal world, I'll take into account her feelings & prioritise her. No Miami/Napa for me.That's in an ideal world. We don't live in one.Most would go put themselves in this environment regardless.If my GF did go, I'd question the essence of our relationship TBH. It isn't just restricted to holidays either.

c/swe are noticing symptoms of an underlying disease,not 'being immature lol' 'being insecure/having trust issues' 'doesnt have current gf lol' etc

[SoCo KinG]

But the only evidence people on here have is the fact they've beat girls in relationships but the girls that wernt interested in..they forgotten them, they don't realize that maybe the girls rejecting them were rejecting them because they were in relationships.... Example..ur in napa...you try 'chat up' 10 girls...all in relationships...5 of them you beat..5 of them air you..you're not going to even know or remember if the 5 that air'd you are in a relationship..all you're going to know about is the 5 that you did beat..so thats going to put into ur mind that all girls in relationships cheat..when actually it was 50/50get my point?

LOL There are some who will not, but the majority of the "with someone" girls will give out. If they do not communicate with any male then they probably wont cheat, but be true to yourself, if she gonna go them places on a regular basis then you'll fail in life, with women, with your kids etc etc

Fair enough on a "REGULAR BASIS"... First smart thing you've said

You think they have to go there on a regular? Ask Lulu, she'll tell you about her friend who had a boyfriend who got loose.

If some of your friends planned to go somewhere for 1 of there birthdays and you didn't want to be the only 1 to miss out, why are you going to care where they are going..the important thing is just that you're there because your friends are.

[Michel Kane]

You're assuming I'm dismissing the possibility of being faithful. Of course you can be faithful.Anyone can cheat, anywhere. It's simply outside your control. However, the places mentioned are INFAMOUS for loose behaviour. It says something about me or my girl if we decide to put ourselves in that sort of situation, regardless.

[Guest Awesome Kong]

But the only evidence people on here have is the fact they've beat girls in relationships but the girls that wernt interested in..they forgotten them, they don't realize that maybe the girls rejecting them were rejecting them because they were in relationships.... Example..ur in napa...you try 'chat up' 10 girls...all in relationships...5 of them you beat..5 of them air you..you're not going to even know or remember if the 5 that air'd you are in a relationship..all you're going to know about is the 5 that you did beat..so thats going to put into ur mind that all girls in relationships cheat..when actually it was 50/50get my point?

LOL There are some who will not, but the majority of the "with someone" girls will give out. If they do not communicate with any male then they probably wont cheat, but be true to yourself, if she gonna go them places on a regular basis then you'll fail in life, with women, with your kids etc etc

Fair enough on a "REGULAR BASIS"... First smart thing you've said

You think they have to go there on a regular? Ask Lulu, she'll tell you about her friend who had a boyfriend who got loose.

If some of your friends planned to go somewhere for 1 of there birthdays and you didn't want to be the only 1 to miss out, why are you going to care where they are going..the important thing is just that you're there because your friends are.

Stupid thing to write. You've said this over & over again. Going to a birthday is different than going to a sex fueled party island where everything is upfront SEX SEX SEX!!! She has her own brain, if she knows it's sex sex sex fueled, then if she respected you, she would never have booked it. You can draw most girls in relationships there because it is a small place and you will see people all the time and get the chance to talk all the time (be it napa, ibiza etc etc), so what you say is rubbish.

[SoCo KinG]

But everyone in here is talking about the girls who go to these places ALREADY planning on cheating... any girl that's not planning on cheating is more likely to cheat while being wined and dined by some french brudda in paris then they are to cheat while getting cheesy chat up lines throw at them in napa etc

[Guest Awesome Kong]

But everyone in here is talking about the girls who go to these places ALREADY planning on cheating... any girl that's not planning on cheating is more likely to cheat while being wined and dined by some french brudda in paris then they are to cheat while getting cheesy chat up lines throw at them in napa etc

Not all girls who cheat go there with the intension to. There will be guys with rubbish game, guys with game and guys who will have some next level game. OR there maybe certain guys who are that guy to break her (no pun intended) and this will be the downfall. Keep kidding yourself & let your mrs keep going these places, putting herself in needless attention seeking

[Heero Yuy]

TBH, I think the bottom line is, why are you putting yourself in those kind of environments?Male or female, what does that say about you? Especially if you're in a relationship.It's also a question of priorities.I could be in a relationship. My boys could arrange a trip tp Napa, Miami, etc. I may want to go, but I know what MAY go down there & I'll be aware of how my GF may think of it. In an ideal world, I'll take into account her feelings & prioritise her. No Miami/Napa for me.That's in an ideal world. We don't live in one.Most would go put themselves in this environment regardless and you can apply to real life.If my GF did go, I'd question the essence of our relationship TBH. It isn't just restricted to holidays either.

Only post in this thread that harbours any bit of common sense.This is one of those subjects where you cannot get a feasible answer on VIP.