Okay if he did it, where?
Cos the no DNA bit throws me off.
The blood I can't take as evidence and the sweat/additional DNA which programme left out, the deams made a point of Brandon saying and putting it there so to me thats still kinda suspect.
Recommended Posts
Anyone seen either of these?
/
meant to be a similar vibe to Making a Murderer
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grafter
no but thanks for posting, will watch
I watched something called the imposter the other day - the twist is wtf, its all wtf tbh
i just read the full synopsis on putlocker for the friedmans one and fucking ell that's a day time watch. i feel upset
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mizchif
Watched every single episode last Sunday on a fuckeries after Tobacco docks. Highly recommend
Link to comment
Share on other sites
local
They dragged it out a bit tho
Coulda been a few eps shorter
Last ep was an anti climax
N the part they left out about him touching up Brendan weren't on
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grafter
What?
Did he really tho?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
local
Check the links faze posted first page
I understand why they'd mislead the viewer, look how it's blown up
But I'm not sure this is the huge miscarriage people want it to be
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SLEAZE BALL
The arguments on the links posted aren't really definitive at all tbh
Link to comment
Share on other sites
local
Nope
It just paints a different picture of the bloke and why the jury may have swung a different way than the audience of the doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TF S4DK
My real question is, if he didn't do it, who did?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Posted