Jump to content

Signing of the season?

BATTY BOY BUM BANDIT

By BATTY BOY BUM BANDIT
in Sports Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Agony Newbie

Agony

Posted
Posted
lol at Man Utd fans adopting that £8 million plus add ons sh*t after cussing Arsenal fans for the same thing.
They was getting cussed because they would say something like Anderson costs £17mill instead of saying £8mill plus add ons but then turn around and say something like Walcott costs £6mill plus add ons instead saying he costs £12mill.
I am yet to see anyone on here say Torres cost £17 million plus Garcia so it still stands.
Didn't realise Garcia was included in that deal
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Agony Newbie

Agony

Posted
Posted
Atlético MadridWhen Liverpool began negotiations to sign Fernando Torres from Atlético Madrid, the scale of the fee at £20 million (€30 million) started to raise media speculation that Garcia would become a "makeweight" in the deal. Benitez didn't want to allow Garcia to leave, and Liverpool reportedly told Atlético that Garcia was valued at £19m. Garcia later revealed that he wanted to return to Spain at some point and play for Atlético, and on July 2 his agent revealed that a deal was being put in place for a permanent transfer. Garcia signed for Atlético on 3rd July, separate to the eventual Torres deal, on a three year deal for a fee of £4million.[5]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Javier_Garc%C3%ADa_Sanz
seen, so thats why no one here says Torres cost £17 million plus Garcia
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BATTY BOY BUM BANDIT Newbie

BATTY BOY BUM BANDIT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
lol at Man Utd fans adopting that £8 million plus add ons sh*t after cussing Arsenal fans for the same thing.
Thats the reason we started doing it.Arsenal fans used to come with, Walcott £5m BRAP BRAP Sicktings etc etc.But in the next sentence they woudl say, f*ck paying £30m for Rooney, evn though it was something liek £24 + add ons.And also say, f*ck £18m for Carrick, even though it was £14m, and we onyl eneded up paying 16m.So..........RELAX
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rsonist Newbie

Rsonist

Posted
Posted
Garcia was a seperate transfer.Thats like me saying the shite hart lane club paid £13m for Bent.Because they sold Boro Mido for £5m.SMH
You clown of all clowns. Do you honestly think we paid £18m up front for Bent.It was £11m+add on's to reach the full sum of £16.5m, if you really wanna go down that route Mr. "Wally for £12m" was a sick buy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Flojo Newbie

Flojo

Posted
Posted
Atlético MadridWhen Liverpool began negotiations to sign Fernando Torres from Atlético Madrid, the scale of the fee at £20 million (€30 million) started to raise media speculation that Garcia would become a "makeweight" in the deal. Benitez didn't want to allow Garcia to leave, and Liverpool reportedly told Atlético that Garcia was valued at £19m. Garcia later revealed that he wanted to return to Spain at some point and play for Atlético, and on July 2 his agent revealed that a deal was being put in place for a permanent transfer. Garcia signed for Atlético on 3rd July, separate to the eventual Torres deal, on a three year deal for a fee of £4million.[5]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Javier_Garc%C3%ADa_Sanz
seen, so thats why no one here says Torres cost £17 million plus Garcia
So we valued Garcia at £19 million and then proceeded to sell him for £4 million?You also conveniently left out
When Liverpool began negotiations to sign Fernando Torres from Atlético Madrid, the scale of the fee at £20 million (€30 million) started to raise media speculation that Garcia would become a "makeweight" in the deal. Benitez didn't want to allow Garcia to leave.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Agony Newbie

Agony

Posted
Posted
Atlético MadridWhen Liverpool began negotiations to sign Fernando Torres from Atlético Madrid, the scale of the fee at £20 million (€30 million) started to raise media speculation that Garcia would become a "makeweight" in the deal. Benitez didn't want to allow Garcia to leave, and Liverpool reportedly told Atlético that Garcia was valued at £19m. Garcia later revealed that he wanted to return to Spain at some point and play for Atlético, and on July 2 his agent revealed that a deal was being put in place for a permanent transfer. Garcia signed for Atlético on 3rd July, separate to the eventual Torres deal, on a three year deal for a fee of £4million.[5]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Javier_Garc%C3%ADa_Sanz
seen, so thats why no one here says Torres cost £17 million plus Garcia
So we valued Garcia at £19 million and then proceeded to sell him for £4 million?You also conveniently left out
When Liverpool began negotiations to sign Fernando Torres from Atlético Madrid, the scale of the fee at £20 million (€30 million) started to raise media speculation that Garcia would become a "makeweight" in the deal. Benitez didn't want to allow Garcia to leave.
I didn't leave anything out...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Flojo Newbie

Flojo

Posted
Posted
Atlético MadridWhen Liverpool began negotiations to sign Fernando Torres from Atlético Madrid, the scale of the fee at £20 million (€30 million) started to raise media speculation that Garcia would become a "makeweight" in the deal. Benitez didn't want to allow Garcia to leave, and Liverpool reportedly told Atlético that Garcia was valued at £19m. Garcia later revealed that he wanted to return to Spain at some point and play for Atlético, and on July 2 his agent revealed that a deal was being put in place for a permanent transfer. Garcia signed for Atlético on 3rd July, separate to the eventual Torres deal, on a three year deal for a fee of £4million.[5]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Javier_Garc%C3%ADa_Sanz
seen, so thats why no one here says Torres cost £17 million plus Garcia
So we valued Garcia at £19 million and then proceeded to sell him for £4 million?You also conveniently left out
When Liverpool began negotiations to sign Fernando Torres from Atlético Madrid, the scale of the fee at £20 million (€30 million) started to raise media speculation that Garcia would become a "makeweight" in the deal. Benitez didn't want to allow Garcia to leave.
I didn't leave anything out...
unsure.gif Point taken.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TF S4DK Newbie

TF S4DK

Posted
Posted
Garcia was a seperate transfer.Thats like me saying the shite hart lane club paid £13m for Bent.Because they sold Boro Mido for £5m.SMH
You clown of all clowns. Do you honestly think we paid £18m up front for Bent.It was £11m+add on's to reach the full sum of £16.5m, if you really wanna go down that route Mr. "Wally for £12m" was a sick buy.
Your deal for bent is worth 18m, same way ours for Theo is worth 12m.f*ck all this add on business bit. Man should only be bringing that up when the transfer hasnt worked... Oh wait...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Tronics

Guest Tronics

Posted
Posted

1. Santa Cruz - Looks a tottally different player from when he was Bayern, a real goal threat that hasn't found the transition to the Prem hard at all.2. Torres - One of the best strikers in Europe let alone the league.3. Christopher Samba - Top, top, top defender that has everything, he can even score pretty good goals, lol.4. Petrov - A throwback winger that's added a dimension to Cithe's attack.5. Andy Reid - It's a bit of a curve ball this one but i still think he's done enough to ensure Sunderlands survival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Posted

Nani 4 goals 11 assists

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rsonist Newbie

Rsonist

Posted
Posted
Spurs fans ruining the thread with bale/woodgate comments and saying santa cruz aint a good signing.
Who said Santa Cruz isnt a good signing?Allow twisting words.And Bale and Woodgate are very good shouts. Woodgate won a trophy for us.And for the 14 games Bale played in, he was MOTM in 7 of them.Impressive.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LS Newbie

LS

Posted
Posted
Torres the top one but others sagna, santa cruz.Spurs fans ruining the thread with bale/woodgate comments and saying santa cruz aint a good signing.
So bale ain't one of the best signings this season? If he never got his bone broken by some c*nt in birmingham everyone would be on his nuts right now.Woodgate ain't one of the best signings either yea? Yet he helped us win a cup.Smh @ what this forum has become.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...