Man Utd Premiership Champions 2008/09

[Flojo]

Attack and defend in equal quantities.

Basically

Equal is taking it too far. You can get away with being poor offensively as a full back but you can't get away with being poor defensively.

[Lenny]

***

[HangTheDJ]

Ashley Cole will regain his crown next season and wont have this argument anymore

[BATTY BOY BUM BANDIT]

Attack and defend in equal quantities.

Basically

Equal is taking it too far. You can get away with being poor offensively as a full back but you can't get away with being poor defensively.

Sorry, I meant quality wise.If your SICK at attacking, then youl be sick at defending if you do each eqally if you get me?And if your sh*t at defending your sh*t at attacking, if ya zimi?So be as good at defending as attackingam i making sense?need to go sleep man

[LS]

Bale will dead this thread next season NO f*ckIN HYPE

[Davicious X]

Attack and defend in equal quantities.

Basically

Equal is taking it too far. You can get away with being poor offensively as a full back but you can't get away with being poor defensively.

Sorry, I meant quality wise.If your SICK at attacking, then youl be sick at defending if you do each eqally if you get me?And if your sh*t at defending your sh*t at attacking, if ya zimi?So be as good at defending as attackingam i making sense?need to go sleep man

Your making sense to a point but that principle is still flawed sinceRiise- better defensivelyCafu- better offensivelyEboue- better offensively (or to put it another way) is just sh*tWes Brown- better defensivelyJust cos you can attack well doesnt mean you can defend well.

[Lenny]

Attack and defend in equal quantities.

Basically

Equal is taking it too far. You can get away with being poor offensively as a full back but you can't get away with being poor defensively.

Sorry, I meant quality wise.If your SICK at attacking, then youl be sick at defending if you do each eqally if you get me?And if your sh*t at defending your sh*t at attacking, if ya zimi?So be as good at defending as attackingam i making sense?need to go sleep man

Your making sense to a point but that principle is still flawed sinceRiise- better defensivelyCafu- better offensivelyEboue- better offensively (or to put it another way) is just sh*tWes Brown- better defensivelyJust cos you can attack well doesnt mean you can defend well.

I rectract my co sign from earlier on in these series of quotes, i thought he ment something else still

[BATTY BOY BUM BANDIT]

Nah I mean that you should be as good as attacking as you are at defending.A full back should be good at both, not better at one than the other.

[Guest Teddy Riley]

Evra can defend just as well as Ashley Cole...Cole can't attack as well as Evra...Now, put 2 + 2 together....

[Agony]

Evra can defend just as well as Ashley Cole...Cole can't attack as well as Evra...Now, put 2 + 2 together....

C/S[/Thread]

[n/a]

Just cos you can attack well doesnt mean you can defend well.

surely that was blatently obvious before the topic begunand lol at messi makin evra look like a conference playerevra done quite well against messi in comparison to what messi does week in week out

[darkman]

Zambrotta > anyone else (dnt care if he had a poor season)

Your living in 04

lol Zambrotta is different class

[anelka]

Ashley is a better defender than Evra, but Evra is better offensivelyHenry, Bergkamp & Pires made Cole look good in an attacking sense, hes not all that attack wiseA FB job is to defend 1st, thats why Cole>>>EvraEvra is sick th0e

[BATTY BOY BUM BANDIT]

I found a better way to put it.I mean that in the list of a full backs priorities, Defending should not come higher than Attacking.They should be the same priority.

[Davicious X]

I found a better way to put it.I mean that in the list of a full backs priorities, Defending should not come higher than Attacking.They should be the same priority.

Wakes up and has an epiphany.And I still dont agree.Guess we will just have to agree to disagree