Jump to content

Controversial opinions that you have

Gunner

By Gunner
in Whatever

 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Ian Wright 8

Guest Ian Wright 8

Posted
Posted
You make a very good point O-GuyBut, being that sex is for the purpose of pro-creationIs it not down to the socialisation that we have received from society that we now can have sex freely, as only a form of pleasure with no thought of reproduction?Birth control pill, condoms etc etcPersonally I see it as being a man, you are naturally attracted to the opposite sex for the purpose of reproductionBeating a next man doesn't serve this purposeThe vagina becomes naturally lubricated to ease the entry of the penis, no such thing happens with the anusI'm pretty sure that having fecal matter enter your urethra will also give you some sort of infection..I'm not sure homosexuality can be supported by saying it is natures way or anything of the sortThe anus is meant to push things out, not take things inThe body doesnt support that type of activity in anyway whatsoever, infertility as population control maybe, I wouldnt say homosexualityIf you want to place your penis inside the place another mans sh*t comes out off, IMO you are a deviant (not you of course)As for society, watching crucifictions, gladiatorial combat, burnings and executions were all also considered hobbies in BC rome, not sure that makes it correctuntil early in our century the Siwans in Northern Africa expected all "normal" males to engage in homosexual intercourse, and they regarded those who refused to do so as peculiar or "queer". In contrast, the Rwala Bedouins, who lived on the Arabic peninsula, considered homosexual practices to be so "abnormal" and outrageous, that they put the participants to death.Society will always swing in either way, I dont really see societys way of seeing it as right, just what I thinkAlthough it probably doesnt seem like it because of however many paragraphs i've posted on it, as Jubez said, I actually dont have a problem with people being gay, the same as I dont have a problem with people drinking/smokingBut in the same way I dont think its morally right to sell alchohol or drugs, I dont think its morally right to promote homosexuality...
sorry for dragging this back up but i just wanted to say...the idea that sex is solely for the purpose of procreation is a religious conceptthere is no factual evidence to indicate that this was nature's intentyes, sex can lead to procreation when practiced by a male and female of the same specieshowever, there is no factual evidence that this is the only way in which sex can be usedsex is naturally used for pleasure, not just by humans but by other mammals as wellso when partaking in sex for the purpose of pleasure there is no logical reason why it cannot be with either a male or female
why did u post this?it's dumb and unnecessary
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 691
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Fresh Newbie

Fresh

Posted
Posted
You make a very good point O-GuyBut, being that sex is for the purpose of pro-creationIs it not down to the socialisation that we have received from society that we now can have sex freely, as only a form of pleasure with no thought of reproduction?Birth control pill, condoms etc etcPersonally I see it as being a man, you are naturally attracted to the opposite sex for the purpose of reproductionBeating a next man doesn't serve this purposeThe vagina becomes naturally lubricated to ease the entry of the penis, no such thing happens with the anusI'm pretty sure that having fecal matter enter your urethra will also give you some sort of infection..I'm not sure homosexuality can be supported by saying it is natures way or anything of the sortThe anus is meant to push things out, not take things inThe body doesnt support that type of activity in anyway whatsoever, infertility as population control maybe, I wouldnt say homosexualityIf you want to place your penis inside the place another mans sh*t comes out off, IMO you are a deviant (not you of course)As for society, watching crucifictions, gladiatorial combat, burnings and executions were all also considered hobbies in BC rome, not sure that makes it correctuntil early in our century the Siwans in Northern Africa expected all "normal" males to engage in homosexual intercourse, and they regarded those who refused to do so as peculiar or "queer". In contrast, the Rwala Bedouins, who lived on the Arabic peninsula, considered homosexual practices to be so "abnormal" and outrageous, that they put the participants to death.Society will always swing in either way, I dont really see societys way of seeing it as right, just what I thinkAlthough it probably doesnt seem like it because of however many paragraphs i've posted on it, as Jubez said, I actually dont have a problem with people being gay, the same as I dont have a problem with people drinking/smokingBut in the same way I dont think its morally right to sell alchohol or drugs, I dont think its morally right to promote homosexuality...
sorry for dragging this back up but i just wanted to say...the idea that sex is solely for the purpose of procreation is a religious concept
*Nature
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Em Dott Newbie

Em Dott

Posted
Posted
You make a very good point O-GuyBut, being that sex is for the purpose of pro-creationIs it not down to the socialisation that we have received from society that we now can have sex freely, as only a form of pleasure with no thought of reproduction?Birth control pill, condoms etc etcPersonally I see it as being a man, you are naturally attracted to the opposite sex for the purpose of reproductionBeating a next man doesn't serve this purposeThe vagina becomes naturally lubricated to ease the entry of the penis, no such thing happens with the anusI'm pretty sure that having fecal matter enter your urethra will also give you some sort of infection..I'm not sure homosexuality can be supported by saying it is natures way or anything of the sortThe anus is meant to push things out, not take things inThe body doesnt support that type of activity in anyway whatsoever, infertility as population control maybe, I wouldnt say homosexualityIf you want to place your penis inside the place another mans sh*t comes out off, IMO you are a deviant (not you of course)As for society, watching crucifictions, gladiatorial combat, burnings and executions were all also considered hobbies in BC rome, not sure that makes it correctuntil early in our century the Siwans in Northern Africa expected all "normal" males to engage in homosexual intercourse, and they regarded those who refused to do so as peculiar or "queer". In contrast, the Rwala Bedouins, who lived on the Arabic peninsula, considered homosexual practices to be so "abnormal" and outrageous, that they put the participants to death.Society will always swing in either way, I dont really see societys way of seeing it as right, just what I thinkAlthough it probably doesnt seem like it because of however many paragraphs i've posted on it, as Jubez said, I actually dont have a problem with people being gay, the same as I dont have a problem with people drinking/smokingBut in the same way I dont think its morally right to sell alchohol or drugs, I dont think its morally right to promote homosexuality...
sorry for dragging this back up but i just wanted to say...the idea that sex is solely for the purpose of procreation is a religious conceptthere is no factual evidence to indicate that this was nature's intentyes, sex can lead to procreation when practiced by a male and female of the same specieshowever, there is no factual evidence that this is the only way in which sex can be usedsex is naturally used for pleasure, not just by humans but by other mammals as wellso when partaking in sex for the purpose of pleasure there is no logical reason why it cannot be with either a male or female
The biggest end result though however is procreation. It just so happens pleasure occurs during sex, but the pleasure occurs during an act which leads to procreation. And logically, the lubrication of the vagina allows easier access for the penis which in turn produces precum. It logically works with one another to produce a child unless of course infertility is present in either partner. I have no idea if a battyhole gets lubricated but I don't think it does, which in turns makes me agree with Cipher in that it is for the purpose of procreation. I think homsexuality is wrong, but them guys can do what they want as long as I don't have to know about it or be involved with it.Just my 2 pence.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MARLO STANSFIELD Newbie

MARLO STANSFIELD

Posted
Posted
I try my hardest to have faith, but I really do not like most black people. So lost, confused and ignorant when evidence that go against what they believe is clear as day.
Co-motherf*cking-sign to the power of infinity.
smh
shaking even harderas if 'black' people want u to be 'liking' them in the first place numerooo
people like 001 are so good at making essays to justify his own self hate and say people that say they are british and prould are lost yet he dont see that him saying this
I try my hardest to have faith, but I really do not like most black people.
makes him as lost as any black person could ever be.i used to hold his opinion to SOME value on race issues but now ive read this ill just do a smiley like this :lol: :lol: rather ever disagree with him.mans only jamaican when bashment artists are charting in the british charts and shouts it the loudest to vip users other than that he has the most imaginary knowledge to the uk music scene. :rolleyes: IRONICALLY you would be forgiven for thinking he knows more than ANYONE that is british, go figure.
I shouldnt have written that nor left it like that but hey thats what happens when you post inbetween doing your job. Read the post that followed that postAnd I dont call someone a bounty for silly issues like "Oh he has a white girlfriend, hes a bounty" or "He speaks properly so he's a bounty" never that. I'm talking about them self-hate dudes who ONLY have white girlfriends because they "know" black girls are ugly and have bad attitude, hold all the negative stereotypes as gospel and solely surround themselves with white people because they dont like blacks.
fair enough i just saw what i saw and therefore gave a responsehowever if you are gonna type and take it back dont type fam tbh im just granting you the benefit of the doubt cos you humbled yourself but to be honest you shouldnt even type them things by accident.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MARLO STANSFIELD Newbie

MARLO STANSFIELD

Posted
Posted

women above 21 that have HIGH GROWING number ratios of sexual partners in comparison to how many relationships they have had and should except that they are damaged goods and have NO RIGHT to complain about there being a lack of men for them.wifeying you would be like asking the royal bank of scotland to recruit a known felon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Heero Yuy Newbie

Heero Yuy

Posted
Posted

If you get too drunk on a night and need hospital assistance you should be billed for itIf your too drunk and end up fighting and proven to be the aggressor, you should be fined and charged for any hospital injuries you occur or have dealt to the other personand if you abuse your liver throughtout your life time, you should be charged for the cots of the operation of a transplant should that time ever come Peados should never be released back in society, they can't be cured, rehabilitated nuffin... should be sent to live on some island somewereThe legal age of prosecution needs to be lower or atleats every case is looked into througholy when it comes to serious crimes.......^^^ when you hear about 14 and 12 year old kids, killing , beating and torturing other, they should be giving proper sentances or alot less leinient sentances. At a young age you have a morale sense of whats right and wrong.. i prime example were the kids who killed jaime bulger, im sorry but at 10 years old what kind of kids think that is okay to do that, and more to the point what kind of kids think of doing things like that in the first place

Link to comment
Share on other sites
violet Newbie

violet

Posted
Posted
You make a very good point O-GuyBut, being that sex is for the purpose of pro-creationIs it not down to the socialisation that we have received from society that we now can have sex freely, as only a form of pleasure with no thought of reproduction?Birth control pill, condoms etc etcPersonally I see it as being a man, you are naturally attracted to the opposite sex for the purpose of reproductionBeating a next man doesn't serve this purposeThe vagina becomes naturally lubricated to ease the entry of the penis, no such thing happens with the anusI'm pretty sure that having fecal matter enter your urethra will also give you some sort of infection..I'm not sure homosexuality can be supported by saying it is natures way or anything of the sortThe anus is meant to push things out, not take things inThe body doesnt support that type of activity in anyway whatsoever, infertility as population control maybe, I wouldnt say homosexualityIf you want to place your penis inside the place another mans sh*t comes out off, IMO you are a deviant (not you of course)As for society, watching crucifictions, gladiatorial combat, burnings and executions were all also considered hobbies in BC rome, not sure that makes it correctuntil early in our century the Siwans in Northern Africa expected all "normal" males to engage in homosexual intercourse, and they regarded those who refused to do so as peculiar or "queer". In contrast, the Rwala Bedouins, who lived on the Arabic peninsula, considered homosexual practices to be so "abnormal" and outrageous, that they put the participants to death.Society will always swing in either way, I dont really see societys way of seeing it as right, just what I thinkAlthough it probably doesnt seem like it because of however many paragraphs i've posted on it, as Jubez said, I actually dont have a problem with people being gay, the same as I dont have a problem with people drinking/smokingBut in the same way I dont think its morally right to sell alchohol or drugs, I dont think its morally right to promote homosexuality...
sorry for dragging this back up but i just wanted to say...the idea that sex is solely for the purpose of procreation is a religious conceptthere is no factual evidence to indicate that this was nature's intentyes, sex can lead to procreation when practiced by a male and female of the same specieshowever, there is no factual evidence that this is the only way in which sex can be usedsex is naturally used for pleasure, not just by humans but by other mammals as wellso when partaking in sex for the purpose of pleasure there is no logical reason why it cannot be with either a male or female
The biggest end result though however is procreation. It just so happens pleasure occurs during sex, but the pleasure occurs during an act which leads to procreation. And logically, the lubrication of the vagina allows easier access for the penis which in turn produces precum. It logically works with one another to produce a child unless of course infertility is present in either partner. I have no idea if a battyhole gets lubricated but I don't think it does, which in turns makes me agree with Cipher in that it is for the purpose of procreation. I think homsexuality is wrong, but them guys can do what they want as long as I don't have to know about it or be involved with it.Just my 2 pence.
I'm not denying that sex between males and females can lead to procreationall i said was that it is only religious texts that say this is its ONLY purposeas we all know sex is also practiced for pleasure, and it is not just humans that do thisother mammals also practice sex for pleasure, and we can identify this by them engaging in homosexual intercourse (which obvioiusly does not lead to procreation)whether or not you still want to think it is wrong is not the issuei was refering to when wu-tang was saying that sex is for the purpose of procreation as an argument against homosexualityand i was merely pointing out that sex is also naturally performed for pleasure, without procreation as the objective, and in such cases there is no logical reason why it cannot be with a male or female
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...