Percy Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 c/s smaddz statements i believe this was in hayes; place respawns bad youth on a regs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greens Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 erghh Hayes, what a horrible, horrible place, had to live a year in that shithole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kompressor Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 all three are victims, Children this age who are having these sorts of thoughts have obviously been exposed to this sort of thing one way or another. i hope when they say rape they mean "indecent assault" and there was no actuall penertration coz if so that lil girl is f*cked for life. I'm disgusted but actually feel sorry for the two youtes that did it. story actually made me sick 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Planet Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 C/s Smaddz, kids are being exploited these days n big companies know what they're doing even if there is an 18+ stamp on them they know swag parents will be pressurised into buying that sh*t for their kids and feeding them revenues Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeeeeeeeeeeen Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 sh*t like this is gettin more n more common, 1st u had them 2 youts who tortured that boy - now rape? and by 9-10 y o's wow. the future of britian is a a worrying thought imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLACK VICTIM Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 c/s smaddy one girl has a waste mum, taking crack, smoking weed all day, posting time for a zoot on facebook lol, scars indicate injecting her 13 year old just had another abortion, and i found out she told people black boys raped her when she got preg before when it was a scumbag white dude i got bare angry hearing that f*ck waste parents Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Q Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 She lied. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8680370.stm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TimeBomb Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 why is the trial continuing if shes admitted it was a lie? and would they of had to have sexual intercourse for it to be rape? surely theyre not capable of that at their age? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Ant Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 you see how females are devious from early shits disgusting 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Q Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 She was probably led into it through questioning.. Mum was like did this happen..and this and this. And she probably just nodded. sh*t is disgusting, feel it for those boys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grafter Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 she said she lied because she thought if she told her mum the truth, she would think she had been naughty an wouldnt give her any sweets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiKkoNen Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 you see how females are devious from early shits disgusting Exactlyy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquaman Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 girl says two boys raped her cos she was scared she wouldnt get any sweets. these eve's have been scandalous from day dot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corrigan Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 thing ive noticed with jas is that he seems to think he should be on the same sort of level as his parents...thts true of alot of white kids. hence they swear/cuss at their mums and think its ok etc every person is equal imo, has the same rights if anybody is chastising me for no reason i wnt have it, something they have taught me obviously if im in the wrong i wnt say sh*t, but if im getting boyd for something out of my control im not going to have it i wud only swear @ parents if they swear at me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Coquelin Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bardissimo Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Page last updated at 18:27 GMT, Thursday, 13 May 2010 19:27 UK E-mail this to a friend Printable version Girl, eight, says 10-year-old boys 'did not rape her' The girl gave evidence by videolink from another room in the court The girl gave evidence by videolink from another room in the court An eight-year-old girl alleged to have been sexually assaulted by two 10-year-olds has told the Old Bailey that the boys did not rape her. She said she had lied to her mother about what had happened because she had been "naughty" and was worried she would not get any sweets. The girl was allegedly attacked in a field in west London in October 2009. The boys, now aged 10 and 11, each deny two charges of rape and two charges of attempted rape of a child under 13. In cross-examination by defence counsel, the girl admitted that she had voluntarily been playing with the boys and had pulled her own underwear down while the boys exposed themselves to her. Linda Strudwick, defending, asked the girl whether she had told her mother it was one of the boys that did it. AT THE SCENE Andy McFarlane, BBC News, The Old Bailey As the young complainant finished giving evidence, Mr Justice Saunders acknowledged she had been through "an ordeal". During the course of the day, she had spent a total of about two hours and 20 minutes giving evidence - via videolink to spare her the courtroom's intimidating atmosphere. The court had been shown videos of police interviews during which she described - in simple terms - being raped. But, under cross-examination, she denied that first one boy - then the second - had forced her into anything. The barristers tried to ask simple questions, usually getting short replies of "yes", "no", or "I don't remember". Indeed, at one point, Mr Justice Saunders told her: "[Defence barrister] Miss Strudwick is a very nice lady but you don't have to say 'yes' to everything she asks." At the end, he told the girl plainly: "No-one's suggesting you've done anything wrong at all. I'm the judge and I know." She said: "You didn't want your mum to think you had been naughty?" The girl, giving evidence from behind a screen, replied: "Yeah." The judge, Mr Justice Saunders, asked what the girl had been worried about and she replied: "No sweets if it [sic] found out I had been naughty." The judge asked her if she had been naughty when she was with the boys and the girl replied: "Just a tiny bit." The court has been told that the boys tried taking the girl to the third floor of a block of flats, then a nearby bin shed and into some bushes in order to find a "sufficiently secluded spot". They ended up at the field, where both boys carried out the assault, prosecutors say. None of the children involved in the trial can be identified because of their age. When asked by the other boy's barrister, Chetna Patel, if she had played with him before, the girl replied that she had "sometimes". "My sister used to play with him and she kept wanting to kiss him, so my mum wanted me to watch over her," she told the court. Later, when she was asked whether the boy had pulled down her underwear, or carried out the sexual assault, she replied: "No." 'Scooter thrown' However, when Miss Patel asked whether the boy had picked her up at any time, the girl replied: "I can't remember." As she finished her evidence, the judge asked: "Can you now remember what went on in the field?" The girl replied: "I can't remember." The court had earlier seen two videos of police interviews with the girl. During the second, she told an officer that the boys had thrown her scooter in some bushes and told her she would not get it back unless she did what they said. When asked if she had told police during that second interview things that "didn't happen", the girl replied: "No." Earlier, the girl had directed a video operator around a virtual reality reconstruction of her estate to show where the prosecution says she was taken in the run-up to the assault. After identifying the flats, bin shed and bushes in question, she directed the operator to a gap in a fence leading to a field where the assault is alleged to have happened. The trial continues. starting earlier than ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubby Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 In cross-examination by defence counsel, the girl admitted that she had voluntarily been playing with the boys and had pulled her own underwear down while the boys exposed themselves to her. stopped reading there tbh what's wrong with this world? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E.A.S.E Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 This is the danger with teaching children about adult life too young. Especially when you get those little manipulative bitches, who know exactly what they are doing. Damaged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bardissimo Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 This is the danger with teaching children about adult life too young. Especially when you get those little manipulative bitches, who know exactly what they are doing. Damaged. truss it's actually despicable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E.A.S.E Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 You have to question what these parents are exposing/allowing there children to watch. Seems too many parents (and I use this term loosely) want to be there kids friends apposed to a parent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bardissimo Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 i remember in infants school some girl letting the man dem touch her p*ssy inside knickers i wish i could remember her name so i could face book it there was always 1 advanced girl in primary i swear one of the one's i remember had 2 yutes by 15; was pregnant when she was in year 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank. Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Slag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lisa Turtle Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Shocked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepz Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 i remember in infants school some girl letting the man dem touch her p*ssy inside knickers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
i remember in infants school some girl letting the man dem touch her p*ssy inside knickers
i wish i could remember her name so i could face book it
Link to comment
Share on other sites
E.A.S.E
You have to question what these parents are exposing/allowing there children to watch.
Seems too many parents (and I use this term loosely) want to be there kids friends apposed to a parent.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bardissimo
there was always 1 advanced girl in primary i swear
one of the one's i remember had 2 yutes by 15; was pregnant when she was in year 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frank.
Slag.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lisa Turtle
Shocked.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sleepz
Link to comment
Share on other sites