Ravel Morrison's relationship with West Ham has plumbed new depths in a row over wages, writes Tom Hopkinson in the Sunday People .
Â
The 21-year-old has called in the PFA over a complaint that he did not receive his full salary – understood to be around £60,000 – for December and now the players’ union is trying to mediate between the two parties.
Â
The Hammers say that any money deducted is due to an accumulation of fines and club sources insist Morrison was informed through the proper channels.
Â
The club are trying to offload the former Manchester United youngster this month – however, they are struggling to find a taker with his £15,000-a-week wages and reputation major obstacles.
Â
As Sunday People Sport revealed last month, West Ham are looking at every option that is open to them to cancel his contract.
Recommended Posts
Thought cardiff let him go on compassionate leave tho?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thizz
Guy is finished.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mame Biram Diouf
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Heero Yuy
Skysports saying lazio in talks with west ham to sign him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mame Biram Diouf
Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mame Biram Diouf
Â
Would love to know what Pogba thinks about his current situationÂ
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mame Biram Diouf
NFA
Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SLEAZE BALL
My nigga
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SLEAZE BALL
And he got found not guilty for the record
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JOHN DOE
wasnt that explained by banes 'NFA'
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mame Biram Diouf
Â
He is probably going to explain the difference facing chargers or getting NFA and being found not guilty in court after being charged most likely
Â
Al miniscule difference to a law abiding citizen like myself who is just happy to see a player able to carry on playing ball
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thizz
Difference between NFA and not guilty.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SLEAZE BALL
This is the thing
When you make a statement that is incorrect and someone corrects you, you should actually appreciate that someone took the time out to do it
Nothing worse than a smug c*nt that doesn't know what they're talking about
Know what I mean?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thizz
And it's actually a massive difference.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SLEAZE BALL
/ JD the difference is that his legal team have effectively proven he didn't do what he was accused of
NFA just means there is insufficient evidence to prosecute
Link to comment
Share on other sites