Fighting Weight Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 I think Carrick has a better brain, and is better tactically and technically than the other two (in which order I rate Lampard, then Gerrard) I also prefer Carrick for my stylistic preference Carricks best attributes are his ability to pick the right pass, two-footedness, tactical awareness and interception ability and responsibility Lampards best attributes were his engine, shot and ability to arrive late in and outside the box unmarked - he won't run the game but he'll get you goals that win you it I may think Carrick is a better footballer but I can't argue he does more for his team than Lampard did as at the end of the day goals win games 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fighting Weight Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 . 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Peng Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 I hardly ever post here but I HAD TO to say this Porchy yute chats SHIT. Goals win games. This guy must think the aim of football is to make 10 passes to score a point. Straight moron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O Fenomeno Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 We can see why you hardly post in here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOHN DOE Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Peng Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Some bullshit response and man laugh at that. I actually kick ball at a decent level your any guy who probably claims he plays like CR7, know yourself. There is no such thing as a blueprint for a CM and styles make fights. Lampard is a special thing a midfielder who scores goals, every team in the world wants one and he does it better than alot of players who are more talented than him the way your chatting is like man is some any League 1 player who scores pens to and this suddenly gasses people. And a man said "pot shots" like Lampard tekk when striking a ball aint top quality. Your a mug. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O Fenomeno Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 I am going to type something short Both CM's Xavi or Lampard? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horatio Caine Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 hmmmmm lampz does his ting,stil 2nd to gerrard tho... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Peng Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Xavi is clearly the better footballer however how does that somehow mean Lampard is not a quality midfielder? That would be akin to saying that Bale is not quality because he isn't better than CR7 so if that's your argument come better than that. NOONE in this thread said they would choose Lamps over Xavi. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O Fenomeno Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Gerrard doesn't need to score to have a good game nor does Carrick See the difference The guy gets over ran Hence why England's midfield was very weak in major tournaments Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stacksbranning Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Xavi is clearly the better footballer however how does that somehow mean Lampard is not a quality midfielder? That would be akin to saying that Bale is not quality because he isn't better than CR7 so if that's your argument come better than that. NOONE in this thread said they would choose Lamps over Xavi. toure or lampard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O Fenomeno Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 I am making the point you clearly think scoring goals from midfield is important than creating chances Nobody is going to convince me to rate a guy who plays as a CM that has goal scoring as his best asset No way Another thing The only reason why Lampard is mentioned in the same sentence as Gerrard because of his goal scoring imagine that Take that away Like I have always said I rather a CM who hardly score but creates and is very good in Possesion Bale is threat without his goal scoring prowress He is quick/strong and carry the ball That's the difference To clear things up once and for all I am not a fan of One dimensional players Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stacksbranning Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Hardly ever agree with porchy but hes right . Carrick and gerrard boss games . Lampard on the other hand scores tap ins against shit opposition and penalties and does not boss games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Peng Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 By the same token Carrick is also limited in other aspects of his game. Like Lampard, Gerrard was also at his best whilst part of a midfield trio. Blaming Lampard for Englands midfield weakness is silly because Gerrard was equally bad while playing for England and atleast Lampard still contributed through his strength. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horatio Caine Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 u guys are acting like lampard is "michu" or suttin.... lampards passing is top notch,his off the ball movement is good, hardly gets robbed, cant say the same for carrick,he has poor awareness. lampard over carrick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Peng Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 @Stacks - Toure, but I would take Toure over any CM in the league tbh he is the most complete @Porchy - I would agree that Lampards biggest asset is his goalscoring, however like somebody has already said, if you took away Pirlos ability to pass what does he realllly offer? If you took away Vieiras drive would he have been World Class? Its silly to argue that without their strength someone is shit, most players would be. If Messi and Ronaldo did not score so many goals would they be considered quality players? Yes. Would they be considered head and shoulders above everybody else? Probably not. Like it or not football is about putting the ball in the back of the net and this is the reason why Lampard was an integral part of such a successful side for so long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O Fenomeno Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Carrick has better vision and passing range than Lampard Apart from goal scoring what does Lampard have over Gerrard and Carrick (I cannot believe I am talking like this about a CM not a poacher) Lampard never been good in England a shirt not has Gerrard but Gerrard stepped it up in SA 2010 before they ran into the Germans Lampard contributed when? Euro 2004? Three goals Germany 06? Nothing but shots off target SA 2010? Never realised he was there until he Had his arms up in the air for the ball crossing the line. Like I said if he ain't scoring then the guy offers nothing I have more talented players to post about so my View on Lampard is finished Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O Fenomeno Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 I know what they said about Pirlo but he is a midfielder not a striker that's my point I have been screaming this from day one It's like Ronald Koeman his biggest strength was set pieces but he was a CB imagine that not tackling It's like David Luiz biggest asset is his technique/passing range that's why he shouldn't be a CB but deployed more as a CM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horatio Caine Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 I know what they said about Pirlo but he is a midfielder not a striker that's my point I have been screaming this from day one It's like Ronald Koeman his biggest strength was set pieces but he was a CB imagine that not tackling It's like David Luiz biggest asset is his technique/passing range that's why he shouldn't be a CB but deployed more as a CM it took u a while to catch on steeeel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Peng Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 As someone who seems to study the game I am suprised that you rate Gerrard so highly compared to Lampard. Although overall I would rate Gerrard higher to me theres an intelligence about Lampards game that Gerrard has never really had to have until now because he knew his legs would carry him. Come on man Lampard is a solid player, sound technically, intelligent, can pass and excels at scoring goals.The guy is like 2nd or 3rd in assists in the Premier League era (don't quote me), he does the simple things and plays to his strengths and is secure in possession, you can't really ask for more and the only players who really offer more are the really top tier players i.e, the Zidanes, Xavis of this world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marly Mar Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Frank Lampard been a BEAST Goals - Assists 2012/13 Season Totals Starts: 34 • Sub: 9 18 4 2011/12 Season Totals Starts: 44 • Sub: 13 19 10 2010/11 Season Totals Starts: 38 • Sub: 1 13 5 2009/10 Season Totals Starts: 59 • Sub: 3 33 17 2008/09 Season Totals Starts: 70 • Sub: 3 21 20 2007/08 Season Totals Starts: 40 • Sub: 2 22 11 2006/07 Season Totals Starts: 77 • Sub: 4 28 16 2005/06 Season Totals Starts: 51 • Sub: 2 20 10 2004/05 Season Totals Starts: 65 • Sub: 6 23 16 Alot of man on here waffle I realise will post moar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O Fenomeno Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 He has better stats than Iniesta Stats are a myth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoshie Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 I agree in a way, I hate it when guys use stats to say player x is better than player y. But for a player to be so consistent in this league, there's no argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heero Yuy Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Stats don't prove the whole story but when you have a CL medal, Two Championships, second all time top scorer of your club + 2005 FIFA World Player of the Year: Silver Award 2005 Ballon d'Or: Silver Award FWA Footballer of the Year (1): 2005 UEFA Club Midfielder of the Year (1): 2008 World XI (1): 2005 PFA Fans' Player of the Year (1): 2005 Premier League : Player of the Decade, (2000–2009) according to official statistics[18] Premier League Player of the Season (2): 2004–05, 2005–06 Premier League 20 Seasons Awards : Premier League 500 Club England Player of the Year (2): 2004, 2005 UEFA Euro 2004 Team of the Tournament 2006 FIFA World Cup : Man of the match vs Paraguay Premier League Player of the Month (4): September 2003, April 2005, October 2005, October 2008 Chelsea Player of the Year (3): 2004, 2005, 2009 PFA Premier League Team of the Year (3): 2004, 2005, 2006 Premier League : 2004–05 Barclays Merit Award (for 164 consecutive appearances) ESM Team of the Year (3): 2004–05, 2005–06, 2009–10 FWA Tribute Award : 2010 Premier League : leader in assists – 2004–05 : 16 assists, 2009–10 : 17 assists FA Cup Final Man of the Match (1): 2007 FA Cup: Best player – 2006–07, 2008–09, 2009–10 Premier League : Midfielder with the most goals in the Premier League history – 160 goals Goal of the Month – April 2010 Only player to score at least 10 goals in ten Allow it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agony Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Always find it funny when a Regista gets criticised for not scoring enough goals. The game has moved on from every CM playing in a 4-4-2 and running around trying to be a DM, CM and CAM at the same damn time. / Stats shouldn't be used solely to base an opinion on a player but should be used to back up an argument against someone that watches the same games as you but comes up with a bunch of nonsense about a player because their judgement is clouded by a bandwagon or just biased views. E.g. when someone says a player only passes sideways but a stat shows he's played more forward passes than anyone in his league this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.