Jump to content

Syria


SLEAZE BALL

Recommended Posts


 

Quote

 

President Donald Trump, speaking at a news conference on Wednesday, said the chemical attack against Syrian civilians "crossed a lot of lines for me" and changed the way he views Syria and leader Bashar al-Assad.

"I now have responsibility, and I will have that responsibility and carry it very proudly," Trump said responding to a question about a White House statement Tuesday that blamed the attack in part on President Barack Obama.
"It is now my responsibility. It was a great opportunity missed," Trump said.
Syrian describes losing 25 relatives in attack


Trump: 'I now have responsibility'


Trump did maintain that Obama's failure to respond to his red line threat "was a blank threat (that) set us back a long ways, not only in Syria but in many other parts of the world."
The President condemned the attack as "heinous."


"Yesterday's chemical attack, a chemical attack that was so horrific in Syria against innocent people, including women, small children and even beautiful little babies, their deaths were an affront to humanity," Trump said from the Rose Garden. "These heinous actions by the Assad regime cannot be tolerated. The United States stands with our allies across the globe to condemn this horrific attack and all other horrific attacks, for that matter."


 

 

from 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is what need to happen with complainers and shit chatters

they need to be put in the position to solve what theyre complaining out and left to crumble

guy has done nothing but embarass himself, if he didnt win he could prob still chat shit and claim to have all the answers

yet all he can do now is blame Obama for everything, Steve Bannon was basically fired yesterday and even that managed to be down to Obama

a Russian spy working for a bank with Trump links just got expelled but im sure that'll be down to Obama too

Obama must have the biggest grin on his face watching this shit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, dub said:

could be someone who wants to make it look like Assad, but it doesn't mean it wasn't

 

 

isis and some of the rebels groups have used chemical weapons and it barely gets reported.

Turkey are confirming it was Assad, same turkey that wants him dead lol.

Swear Assad is clearly winning the war with Russia's help aswell, makes no sense for him to use chemical weapons at this point. Something just seems really off about this situation.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty clear its not him, but powers that be need to sell you justification and moral support for them to go in and deliver "democracy".

Military industrial complex needs to keep share holders happy on profits. Dead stock pile of munitions need to be cleared and keep people employed to manufacturer new upgraded weapons to stock for future wars (profits)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/04/2017 at 8:52 PM, Mr. Martinez said:

When I saw this last night I wondered how long it would be before Trump said he was ready to intervene

Don Gambeezy, what's going on bro?

Trump bout to start WW3?

 

He is happy, this the fight back against "White Genocide", gotta stop the muslamics and brown folks.

Modern day crusades battles. Red (blood) and White (skin) flags call to arms. Gotta slay the dragon St.George would be proud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/5/2017 at 8:52 PM, Mr. Martinez said:

When I saw this last night I wondered how long it would be before Trump said he was ready to intervene

Don Gambeezy, what's going on bro?

Trump bout to start WW3?

 

Do you need my opinion lol. I seldom post on here now, forums a laughing stock with resident guys like VTec salivating with their Anti White fantasies.

I don't support these air strikes. In fact from what I am seeing Trumps hard core supporters are pretty pissed off at him for doing them. The people who are seemingly happy about it from the Twitter reactions are the 'Liberals' and Democrats - not surprising really is it. Only way they are willing to get behind Trump is when they get to witness murdering of more people in the middle east. He's gone against everything he said previously about getting involved in Syria. Only thing he can take credit for is that he's actually shown if you cross that red line Obama set he will punish you for it, something which Obama apparently never had the balls to do.

Oh and I sat here for days watching the Trump topic, not a single mention of the Susan Rice story lol. Proper neutral these forums aye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh.. the old Pin on Obama tactic... Yawnage.

Bush Senior - Gave you the Gulf War and beginning of middle east destabilise program. and maintained alot of Regans' policy towards its own US citizens and international war policy

Clinton - orders a bombing attack against Iraq after Saddam Hussein refuses to cooperate with United Nations weapons inspectors. There is concern that he is hiding weapons of mass destruction. And setup the current private corp prison system locking up mainly latinos and black men

Bush Junior - Gave you 9/11, Enron Scandal which plunged world into Recession, Started an illegal War in Iraq to destabilise it.. and ISIS rises from its ashes.

Obama - Sold hope and change. yet more deaths of Black folks died under his watch from state police rivalling pre civil rights era. Maintained the middle east destabilise program from 9/11 (but is blamed for starting ISIS). Kills Gaddaffi

Trump – so far Russian infiltration links, far right supremacist adviser to Trump Breitbart Steve Bannon taken of national security council for suspect links to Russia, various over top officials falling left right and centre. Blames everything on Obama and has convinced his sheep this is only truth. Everything is fake news, except for fox news. (possible WW3? but blamed opposition being the ones to drag into another war.

Think you need to wake up lad.

Liberal or Republican, you're being had.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Heero Yuy said:

 

 

isis and some of the rebels groups have used chemical weapons and it barely gets reported.

Turkey are confirming it was Assad, same turkey that wants him dead lol.

Swear Assad is clearly winning the war with Russia's help aswell, makes no sense for him to use chemical weapons at this point. Something just seems really off about this situation.

Isis and the rebels havent used chemical weapons and dont have the recources and it is very very far from everything they have been doing in this war.

False flags are Turkeys manouver but they have achieved their (albiet restructured) goal in syria in stopping the kurds from taking arab and turkmen territory and connecting up to make a state on the border, they have moved on to iraq in recent weeks. Losing key generals in the coup has left them weak and set them back decades in tactical warfare. They have also lost lots of allies in this war and if it was indeed them then wow well played because they just split up the russia/usa link up that was happening and made themselves a key player in terms of whos side they will join again... (a move too smart for the current inexperienced army generals).

Assad is a madman, the only reason he is winning the war is because of russia and technically he is not he has lost huge amounts of land to new factions that are not isis or the original groups of rebels.

He is just putins bitch and was witnessing syria about to become 3 different states.

It might not be him, there are so many active players in that refion its a madness, USA actually has 3 hands in Syria and 2 of them are fighting each other imagine that.

All for some gas pipes/military bases.

 

/

People should be more worried about not who did it but what happens now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wake up to what?

You sit around telling the forum what I think. When that turns out to be bollocks and I tell you I don't support the bombings, you are still sat there acting like I do PMSL. What is wrong with that head of yours?

You can talk Trump and Russia all day but had Clinton got in you would of had zero to say about her links to Russia and her foundation. And I never pinned any air strike on Obama, I simply mentioned his name in a statement and triggered a Snowflake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Iceberg said:

Isis and the rebels havent used chemical weapons and dont have the recources and it is very very far from everything they have been doing in this war.

 

That is a bold statement Ice. Haven't there already been previous reports on them using chemical weapons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Iceberg said:

Isis and the rebels havent used chemical weapons and dont have the recources and it is very very far from everything they have been doing in this war.

False flags are Turkeys manouver but they have achieved their (albiet restructured) goal in syria in stopping the kurds from taking arab and turkmen territory and connecting up to make a state on the border, they have moved on to iraq in recent weeks. Losing key generals in the coup has left them weak and set them back decades in tactical warfare. They have also lost lots of allies in this war and if it was indeed them then wow well played because they just split up the russia/usa link up that was happening and made themselves a key player in terms of whos side they will join again... (a move too smart for the current inexperienced army generals).

Assad is a madman, the only reason he is winning the war is because of russia and technically he is not he has lost huge amounts of land to new factions that are not isis or the original groups of rebels.

He is just putins bitch and was witnessing syria about to become 3 different states.

It might not be him, there are so many active players in that refion its a madness, USA actually has 3 hands in Syria and 2 of them are fighting each other imagine that.

All for some gas pipes/military bases.

 

/

People should be more worried about not who did it but what happens now.

 

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.newsweek.com/isis-used-chemical-weapons-least-52-times-iraq-and-syria-new-analysis-shows-523845%3Famp%3D1

assad has been gaining ever since Russia joined in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ the gambot Nah, you do that on your own. The forum knows where you stand and your own neg count speaks for itself, scan back through your own posts. (this isn't fake facts)

I see through you, and you can't see that others read through you too. Better hop back to sub reddit troll pages and twitter where angry entitled folks sit and bash keyboards all day along with stormfront and any other whiteknight type websites.

FYI the history of the States along with its invasion of that land and European Minions in its ass crack have been in perpetual state of war with the world since Roman leader Alexander the Greek stole shit from Kemet Egypt lol.

  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gambino said:

That is a bold statement Ice. Haven't there already been previous reports on them using chemical weapons?

Yeah think it was Al-Qaeda but when people say the rebels there not talking about them... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Heero Yuy said:

Read that and not just the headline

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IHS_Markit

they did the research yh ??

maybe you guys are right it wasnt assad it was uk/us based agencies 

/

assad regaining territories in name but also compared to 2011 has lost huge amounts of land to kurds and a few other groups who are also russian/us allies and will never see that land ever again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those Tomahawk Missiles launched...

Produced by - Raytheon

The Raytheon Company is a major U.S. defense contractor and industrial corporation with core manufacturing concentrations in weapons and military and commercial electronics. It was previously involved in corporate and special-mission aircraft until early 2007. Raytheon is the world's largest producer of guided missiles.

Established in 1922, the company reincorporated in 1928 and adopted its present name in 1959. The company has around 63,000 employees worldwide and annual revenues of approximately US$25 billion. More than 90% of Raytheon's revenues were obtained from military contracts and, as of 2012, it was the fifth-largest military contractor in the world. As of 2015, it is the third largest defense contractor in the United States by defense revenue.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raytheon#Government_relationship

http://www.raytheon.co.uk/capabilities/products/tomahawk/ - MURICA! (insert 80's style rock guitar riff jam)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8400079/Libya-Navy-running-short-of-Tomahawk-missiles.html INGURLAND!

Government relationship

As the vast majority of Raytheon's revenues have been obtained from defense contracts, there has been a tight relationship of cooperation between itself and the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. government departments and agencies (e.g. in the Fiscal Year 2007 the National Science Foundation awarded Raytheon $152 million in grants, more than to any other institution and organization in the country, for managing NSF South Pole Station). This, along with heavy lobbying, has led to perennial charges of influence peddling. Raytheon, for instance, contributed nearly a million dollars to various defense-related political campaigns in the presidential election year of 2004, spending much more than that on lobbying expenses. And there are many tight ties between the company and all levels of government. For example, Richard Armitage, a former United States Deputy Secretary of State, is linked to the company through consultancy work. John M. Deutch, a former U.S. Director of Central Intelligence, sits on the board of directors, along with Warren Rudman, a former Senator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These wars can never be won, from when they said nations calling themselves the civilised ones are the producers and supplying the supposed troubled countries with the guns, rockects and ammo.

Between US UK https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/27/weapons-flowing-eastern-europe-middle-east-revealed-arms-trade-syria

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22906965

Syria, has no weapons production industry...

Saudi Arabia the home of isis and Al Qeada, import billions of weapons from US and UK

Russia is a producer of weapons and sells to Syria too...or arming the supposed rebels against Isis.

But the US president and current admin are in bed with Russia at the same.

Only one answer to all of this.

video-226618.jpg

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Vtec said:

Pretty clear its not him, but powers that be need to sell you justification and moral support for them to go in and deliver "democracy".

Military industrial complex needs to keep share holders happy on profits. Dead stock pile of munitions need to be cleared and keep people employed to manufacturer new upgraded weapons to stock for future wars (profits)

its a joke

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vtec said:

Those Tomahawk Missiles launched...

Produced by - Raytheon

The Raytheon Company is a major U.S. defense contractor and industrial corporation with core manufacturing concentrations in weapons and military and commercial electronics. It was previously involved in corporate and special-mission aircraft until early 2007. Raytheon is the world's largest producer of guided missiles.

Established in 1922, the company reincorporated in 1928 and adopted its present name in 1959. The company has around 63,000 employees worldwide and annual revenues of approximately US$25 billion. More than 90% of Raytheon's revenues were obtained from military contracts and, as of 2012, it was the fifth-largest military contractor in the world. As of 2015, it is the third largest defense contractor in the United States by defense revenue.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raytheon#Government_relationship

http://www.raytheon.co.uk/capabilities/products/tomahawk/ - MURICA! (insert 80's style rock guitar riff jam)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8400079/Libya-Navy-running-short-of-Tomahawk-missiles.html INGURLAND!

Government relationship

As the vast majority of Raytheon's revenues have been obtained from defense contracts, there has been a tight relationship of cooperation between itself and the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. government departments and agencies (e.g. in the Fiscal Year 2007 the National Science Foundation awarded Raytheon $152 million in grants, more than to any other institution and organization in the country, for managing NSF South Pole Station). This, along with heavy lobbying, has led to perennial charges of influence peddling. Raytheon, for instance, contributed nearly a million dollars to various defense-related political campaigns in the presidential election year of 2004, spending much more than that on lobbying expenses. And there are many tight ties between the company and all levels of government. For example, Richard Armitage, a former United States Deputy Secretary of State, is linked to the company through consultancy work. John M. Deutch, a former U.S. Director of Central Intelligence, sits on the board of directors, along with Warren Rudman, a former Senator.

Biggest joke is that less then half of the missiles landed and of those a lot malfunctioned and didnt go off

$2m each  

$120m spent and the damage was minimal (according to russia)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...