Jump to content

Russian Hammer Murder Video


Jm0nEy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I posted the video already, they aint russian they're from Ukraine. they had their own little team and terrorised some town. they all got nabbed too

watch dis, till this day I aint never seen nuttin like dis on the internet.http://theync.com/media.php?name=6826-shoc...man-is-murderedThey are from Ukraine, Dnepropetrovsk all aged 19. They are known as Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs. They killed 21 people, they started with small animals and moved to humans. 2 murders were filmed, over 300 photos were presented in court. First victim was killed with metal rods, but it took some time, so they used hammers as well (this is where they fit in) and continued the murder spree killings with a hammer. They said in court that 'they just wanted to have someting to remember when they were old'. All photos and videos were found on their computer, videos were filmed with cellphone (as this video). Later on, one of the suspect quit, and 2 guys continued to murder. They also attended funerals of their victims, and took pics. The videos were shown in court just recently. So these 3 are good candidates for this video. This is a short court vid http://www.kp.kiev.ua/daily/291008/60468/
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

they got sentenced yesterday

SentencingOn February 11, 2009, Igor Suprunyuck and Viktor Sayenko were found guilty of premeditated murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. They were also found guilty of robbery and sentenced to fifteen years in prison. Alexander Hanzha, who was not directly involved in the killings, was found guilty of robbery and sentenced to nine years in prison. Hanzha said of Suprunyuck and Sayenko: "If I had known the atrocities that they were capable of committing, I would have gone nowhere near them at gunpoint."[33]The court's verdict was several hundred pages long and was read out over a period of two days. The lawyers for Suprunyuck and Sayenko announced their intention to appeal, saying that the authenticity of the photographic and video evidence had not been established beyond reasonable doubt. The claim was dismissed by Edmund Saakian, a lawyer for one of the victims' families, who commented: "In theory a photo can be faked, but to fake a forty minute video would require a studio and a whole year." The parents of Igor Suprunyuck repeated their belief in his innocence, while Larissa Dovgal, a representative of the victims' families, claimed that other perpetrators involved in the crimes could still be at large.[34]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...