Ghosting & Bannaged?

[Uncle Larry]

What in your Opinion should constituteto to a Ghosting or Banning?

[Guest Flat Eric]

Chatting out of line to Flat Eric.Making exposure threads...Waiting 40 pages..Then dropping a swag picture which isn't even the correct person.

[Shawn_Carter]

Having "young boss" as ur usernametbh

[Action Dan]

Being Flat Eric.

[DRC]

consistent spamming of the forum after they have received prior warning to llow it

[Uncle Larry]

Chatting out of line to Flat Eric.Making exposure threads...Waiting 40 pages..Then dropping a swag picture which isn't even the correct person.

Yeah i hate sh*t topics that claim to expose and there f*ck*ng sh*t. This only happens when someone is trying to gain fame and trying too hard!

[JLovely]

Constantly uppin inapproriate pictures.

[Simply D]

im not gonna lie failed exposures should carry the ultimate death sentence, just for the cheek of tryin to dead somones e-life n failing should be a straight ISP ban still (yeah i knw its usually an ip ting, but ive taken it to the isp level ok)Also threads that BLATENTLY need pictures to make it valid/worthwhile bandwith should carry some sort of a ban still (48hrs or suttin)

[Uncle Larry]

im not gonna lie failed exposures should carry the ultimate death sentence, just for the cheek of tryin to dead somones e-life n failing should be a straight ISP ban still (yeah i knw its usually an ip ting, but ive taken it to the isp level ok)Also threads that BLATENTLY need pictures to make it valid/worthwhile bandwith should carry some sort of a ban still (48hrs or suttin)

Im liking that

[Shawn_Carter]

Starting threads going"_____ is peng alie?"and failing to provide pictorial evidence in teh first post

[mR ReZiW]

Having "young boss" as ur usernametbh

c/s he shudda been ghosted time ago

Constantly uppin inapproriate pictures.

llow me, thats my domain.

[Action Dan]

Starting threads going"_____ is peng alie?"and failing to provide pictorial evidence in teh first post

My pet hate on the e-kerb tbh.

[mR ReZiW]

im not gonna lie failed exposures should carry the ultimate death sentence, just for the cheek of tryin to dead somones e-life n failing should be a straight ISP ban still (yeah i knw its usually an ip ting, but ive taken it to the isp level ok)Also threads that BLATENTLY need pictures to make it valid/worthwhile bandwith should carry some sort of a ban still (48hrs or suttin)

Im liking that

so what about when STAMINA MAN try hot up STEFFIDGE and it flopped wud that of been a ghost ting??

[Guest Remy Lebeau]

this is foolishnessthings like failing to provide pics or sh*t exposure can be dealt with by locking the threadthe problem is when theres not a mod around to lock these threads early to avoid 20 pages of fraff

[Simply D]

Starting threads going"_____ is peng alie?"and failing to provide pictorial evidence in teh first post

KMT suttin else that should hold a ban is people who cant be bothered to read what other people have posted before, or people that have the DYAM f*ck*ng CHEEK to teef a next mans idea n then try n palm it off as their ownWWOOOOSSSAAARRRR!!!! WWOOOOOOOOOO-f*ck*ng-SSSAAARRRRR

[FACE OFF]

i dont even know if the topic is swag i dont read it to tuff.MAKING race topics should be a ban i say this cos all too many times they start and then for some reason they are allowed to go on and then when someone like me says something controversial but TRUE im getting the stick for speaking my mind when really and truly i would never of made a topic like that to begin with ( i find that a moderators error imo they should lock it on SITE)so basically race topics should not be allowed to go any further than 3 posts and the author should be BANNEDsimple.

[Francis Coquelin]

Starting an exposure topic with no pics/video

[Jubez II]

im not gonna lie failed exposures should carry the ultimate death sentence, just for the cheek of tryin to dead somones e-life n failing should be a straight ISP ban still (yeah i knw its usually an ip ting, but ive taken it to the isp level ok)Also threads that BLATENTLY need pictures to make it valid/worthwhile bandwith should carry some sort of a ban still (48hrs or suttin)

Starting threads going"_____ is peng alie?"and failing to provide pictorial evidence in teh first post

These threads are swag but banning isn't something that could be done lightly atm, there's simply not enough people for it.

[FreeMason]

We need that Hide code ASAP.

[Numero001]

this is foolishnessthings like failing to provide pics or sh*t exposure can be dealt with by locking the threadthe problem is when theres not a mod around to lock these threads early to avoid 20 pages of fraff

c/s

[Shawn_Carter]

tbh i dont even care about banning peoplejust take away certain peoples topic making powers

[I.B.Blackman]

Bannage obviously constitutes things like posting inappropriate pics (you know what I mean) and generally doing stuff that could cause trouble for the forum in general.Ghosting should be for minor things like spamming, waste exposures and general d*ckhead behavior.

[FACE OFF]

fraff is fraff ya never gonna stop it cos people can hi jack topics too so to be fair may as well just leave it as it when i think about it how many topics have been about one topic and then deviate to something else.

[Numero001]

Only reason for banning should be spam. Anything other than that should be a lock of the topic. Simple